vidcapper

Posting the same thing twice does not make your argument stronger. :P

How about Donald Trump?

The operative word here is *historical* - like all parties, they have had to evolve over time into a form more acceptable to a mass electorate. Your error is to believe that more than a tiny minority still follow their historical pattern.

If they are delaying the report's release, how on earth can *you* claim to know what is in it? :rolleyes:

Despite getting to the final, Ronnie still needs some more points to be certain of making the Coral series of tournaments. :o I believe he is now 20-something on the one year list. :unsure:

I can't speak for anyone else, but the question I was asked was simply 'Who do intend to vote for in the GE?'. Nothing ambiguous in that.

I wasn't actually requesting *another* example of your obsession. :teresa:

You do realise that this obsession you have about the Tories merely provides us with much amusement, and no-one takes your seriously any more? :rolleyes:

You beat me to that comment. :heehee:

What is the source for Kantar's claimed age weighting - as I simply don't believe they would use such flawed estimates? Also, even if that is the weighting they've been using, to assume other companies must be using similarly flawed assumptions is just... nuts!

Most *everyone* uses mobiles now - it's almost the 2020's. :rolleyes: I wasn't daft enough to give them either my mobile no. or my email address! Well, one out of 7 is pretty pathetic as a guess! :lol: You didn't pick Mariah, which I do like, and you got the name of the Boney M song wrong *again* - it's 'Mary's Boy Child'! I guess with that sort of success rate, you ought to work for a polling company! :rofl:

How is Fantasy Football fake? :huh:

You just f*cked yourself - it wasn't a phone call at all, it was a doorstep interview! :lol:

Are you for real? :wacko:

Err... how on earth could they know what someone's political affiliations were *before* interviewing them? :wacko:

I ask this, because I just have! Specifically, IPSOS/MORI

FFS, GIVE IT A REST! :nono: The polling companies do not care who wins, just in who produces the most accurate result! Political polls are just a fraction of their business - they make their main money from wider market research, and accuracy is what counts.

I've gone through polls for each company 2017-2019, calculating an average result and Tory lead/deficit, and this is what I've come up with... (-ve is Lab lead) Survation -0.71 ComRes 0.70 BMG 0.79 ICM 0.91 Ipsos Mori 1.85 Opinium 2.13 Panelbase 2.50 YouGov 3.97 Kantar TNS 4.06 Deltapoll 4.21 As you can see, Survation is most favourable to Labour over the period, while Deltapoll are the least. Presumably this is mainly due to differing methodologies. :unsure:

So, slightly to the right of Corbyn then... :teresa:

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/n...ata-on-leaflets Yet people claim here that only the Tories lie and manipulate...

Yet another fringe site you had to search for, to find one that says what you're wanting to say...

Probably #82

Imagine the leftist meltdown if he *was*... :rofl:

Because, unless it is proven otherwise, I think the rumours about Trump have been exaggerated.

Why do you even care so much - you don't live in America...