Mushymanrob

agreed, they seem to have lost their way with her. pity, when on form shes hilarious...

ill listen to the vid later, dont want to wake my g/f. ok let me put it this way, if the bnp officially condones violence then they would be banned under uk law. severin is spot on, they know just how far to go to keep within the law. im not arguing my viewpoint on them, im telling you where legally the situation stands.

really?... sounds like bollox to me. i prefer the heart attack explaination, its far more likely.

scott maslan?... best actor? :lol: he isnt even the best actor on eastenders let alone in soap.

huge sympathy for danny miller on other forums, even eastenders fans reckon he should have got best actor over scott the plank.

what a pile of pooh.

a pretty decent episode, abit daft in places but then again thats normal for dr who. 7/10

oh... and ive made my point, thats it, over, please dont anyone respond as im not looking for a mass debate over the subject... ok? :)

one rule for one, one rule for another then is it? just because someone is seen as a trouble maker just because he WANTS to like it but is constantly let down... m8! :P .... and just for the record, i HAVE praised it when imho it deserves it.

shhhhh you arnt allowed to call eastenders $h!t, youll get a warning. <_<

its going to be a very delicate situation if they do work together... there may be some areas of agreement but theres other areas they are totally opposed to. it wouldnt surprise me if any coalition was brought down with disenting tories or lib-dems siding with labour.

...indeed , the lib-dems will pick up alot of votes, the country wants change but they dont want the tories who should have won by a landslide.

yep ..... thats about the size of it. im not saying thats right but LEGALLY thats how it is.

:lol: ive heard that one before....

now youre being daft... nope you dont, the minute you stoop to their level you are no better. you become the very type of person you are supposed to be against. like i said, i didnt hear exactly what was said so ill not pass judgement. as i see it either party could be guilty of provocation. i dont know what he said to get spat at, but the notion that its ok to spit at him simply because hes a bnp member is wrong. im NOT saying that he didnt 'ask for it', he might have, i dont KNOW though what was said. i wonder who the camera person was.... could be a set up. YES! ...... thats exactly where it has to be, in their manifesto or constitution... to be OFFICIALLY a party that supports violence. im not saying that unofficially many of the members dont support violence, im sure they do. however LEGALLY they dont support violence, LEGALLY they are a legitimate political party so you cannot legally 'hate' them just because they are the bnp... legally you have no right to support violence against them, YOU would be the one in the wrong. legally yes they DO have the right to exist alongside the other legitimate parties whether you like it or not. factually thats how it is, i fully accept that many here dont like it, but as long as THE LAW accepts them as a legitimate, legal party then thats how it is. im not defending a party built on hate, im defending the right of a legally recognised party to exist.

im in broad agreement with richard on this, especially the emboldend part. please refrain from personal attacks in this thread, your last line is way out of line m8. i often disagree with richard but respects his views as he always supports them with thought. good idea....

... i think its more about quantity?... i mean, i think political tracks certainly have a place in music but not perhaps all the time.. the manics never really grabbed me tbh.

someone sounds bitter that he is proven wrong! :lol: (craig)

like i said, ill not pass judgement until i know exactly what was said... i agree that the bnp probably shouldnt be legitimate, but they are.... and until they are banned we have to put up with them. by all means campaign against them, but dont stoop to their level otherwise you lose the moral high ground... and youll be no better then them.

as long as they are a legal, legitimate party then i will defend their right to exist as much as any other party.... hating them 'just because' is moronic, and you are stooping to the level of the very people you hate! hyp-o-fukin-crit! hate is hate and is wrong, period.

thats as maybe richard, but i simply dont like him! he comes across as a slimey sound bite boy ... very much like harry enfields 'tory boy'.. i might be proven wrong, he might just be good, but atm in not convinced.

agreed about nikhil and maisie agreed to some extent about terry... he does seem rather surplus to requirements disagree about viv, who has for ages been the most funny character in soaps although recently shes been below par.

yeah, but somehow they pull off looking younger better then the boys... why dont they use real kids like grange hill or byker grove did?

heading for hung.... no landslide that craig and chris confidently predicted. :lol:

1 candidate behaves inappropriately so the WHOLE of the bnp is violent..... <_< pratt. show me the evidence where the PARTY is openly violent or shut up. id like to see the transcript of this, to determine exactly who said what to whom before i pass any judgement .... the notion that 'hes a bnp man so deserves it whatever' is the belief of a moron.