Odaisul

well ABBA next year, so Eurovision did everything they could that would happen and be so convenient.

she didnt deserved higher im afraid, sorry to break the bubble, her vocals were atrocious and the song wasnt unique not stand out, im surprised polish song got so many points.

oFuowIZQDoY

Eurovision has gone from being a constest to a commercial show when during the competition we see songs participating in the streaming charts that influence the vote, and with rehearsals being accessed to the public when all this should only be seen live on the day of the program, and the top streaming only available after the show.

i dont agree, they shouldnt even be in the semis to begin with.

Eurovision songs shouldnt be commercialized is a contest not Top of the Pops, the entries shouldnt even be the streams/charts during the competition, only after.

im surprised why Sweeden isnt part of the big 5 it should replace spain or uk

Eurovision became too commercial instead of a contest, and the jury is part of that commercial process, instead of a song the jury votes for a commercial hit.

sweeden didnt won the televoting so all this was done on purpose by the jury so that ABBA and Eurovision could celebrate 50 years next year so convenient a jury pushing something to happen to please a music group instead of doing their job in the most neutral possible way The rest of the world gave only 7 points to Sweeden

the jury agree the votes between themselves in different countries (not all) thats why most of them voted the same way, this isnt a jury but a group to push the commercial music companies that hold the artits they voted for.

everyone had better vocals, what tricks they made??

speak about yourself not about others

i think Portugal oversahed Austria performance, Americans loved Portuguese entry more.

what?? this is not BBC issue that a artist cant sing live

i think i have heard this song before in the radio :kink: :rolleyes:

what they did for Blanka was almost a playback with back vocals almost being the main vocal, so she didnt had any effort because her live is awfull.

its sad that in a song competition, people prefer supporting the use of tricks to pretend to sound better than supporting the ones who dont need such tricks and can sing live perfectly

voted

just discovered the sound of some acts didnt sounded good on tv but on youtube sounds lot better

it was me or did some of you noticed differences of the sound quality of some acts?? I thought it was the microphones, Switzerland, Ireland, Israel, Sweeden, Finland and Chechia had their sound better while singing, while the others had some kind of "echo" or "emptiness" on their vocal sound.

what?? Croatia were always to qualify?? i would preferred Ireland or Netherlands over nonsence Croatia, Happy for Portugal was it was obvious qualifiers, if with low budget staged they qualified imagine with a high budget.

uP5LH_k-7DE WOW just WOW speechless :o :w00t: :o the best vocal of Eurovision this year

hAkHCTGl834 Acustic version

COErIMq3AFo One of the best vocal this year.

im not alone on this, so you stop coming for me, get real is a competition not Top of the Pops. :rolleyes: