NatalieMusicX

I knew therd be something about the sales of the paper. it just goes to show. In september they are releasing a 14 track edition of this album, which they will sell normally. i wonder how that turns out :P xxxxxx

Dude. They write ALL of their own songs. Equally. The only one who doesn't really ever get involved is the drummer....but why should he need to. Theres no dominant song writer. Don't speak about something that you clearly have no idea about.

Also matt. Noticed Regina Spektor in your albums.....is it good? I've heard the song she did for Narnia...loveeddddd it!!! :)

But no offence, they HAVEN'T. Yes, on paper they've had loads of #1s. But most of them sold very little. "Baby's Got Back" for instance. A #1 in 2007. Impressive? Well no actually. It ended up the 168th "biggest" selling single of the year. Behind Mika's "Lollipop" which never peaked higher than #59. Behind The Killers "Mr Brightside", behind Survivor's "Eye Of The Tiger", behind Queen "Don't Stop Me Now"; none of which even had a release in 2007. By most people's standards, a FLOP. The kind of sales which would usually get a pop act axed. ^^ by success i meant they have earned enough money to live off for the rest of their lives. Which by now to most celebs would stop them from working, but they carry on. :)

Nevertheless, it is the fourteenth straight top ten hit for the band who seem to be one of the only acts left who can guarantee a top ten hit with every release. from the news thingy please tell me im not the only one that just read that!!!!

Whats the GH im so confused lmao! I have the album on again!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxnePAqDdvE...feature=related tbh!

haha! im niceeeee :| this topic just brings out the hulk in me mannnnnnnnnnnnn!!!

Ok this ones going to be long. I got that deal 3 for £4 and got this dvd with it. And in watching i earnt a hell of alot of respect for them. Because they are so talented and you really see it in this dvd. Tom said that they wrote 'One For The Radio' when they were making their first album, but got the feeling the other lads didn't like it..... which is probably why it sounds like the rest of their stuff. I have their new album on at the moment, and i have to say im impressed. They also say on the dvd that they think its their best work which is why they wanted to release it in the paper....so it reached a wider audience. (oh i wasn't saying they were better then the beatles. Pschhhh) Bu the thing is, Think about it, mcfly have made such a mark on the industry, just look at this post. Like every other band in the industry not everyone is going to like them. But they are VERY popular. Weather you like it or not they've had the greatest success people of their ages should get. They've spent a year in AUS independently recording this album, at their own speed there was no deadlines....and it shows. Its the best album in my opinion. And i think if your ever going to give them an ounce of a chance now is the time to do it. They're slowly shaking away the image, i doubt they'll ever get rid of the fanbase.....but its not like it matters. People should cut them some slack, they're four guys making music the way they love to do it. The reason people that like them get so angry is because the way the haters portray them is so wrong its unbelievable. I know a hell of alot of your are going to disagree with me....but the thing is, they wern't a one hit wonder. And that sometimes makes me wonder if thats the reason some hate them......pschhhh as for the busted thing.....they're friends with James Bourne....who technically got them started....so the more you insult Mcfly the more you insult him. Busted were great as a threesome but the second they split, when Matt went solo, Charlie made Fightstar and Jmaes made SOD none of them took off. So at least Mcfly have stayed true to themselves and not given up just because of a little negativity. Fair enough if they arn't your cup of tea.....i just think its unfair to say they're untalented. *breathes* Over and Out :)

Im surprised no-ones discussed this yet

surprising i guess but i wouldn't buy it

Good answer! Wow i've sparked something here haha The thing i like about Mcfly is that they arn't fake....they play their own instruments and always perform live ( i know that because i used to be obsessed :o ) I think they've been given the short straw where image is concerned because they do sometimes only appeal to one set audience. However i have been to see them twice (and will be going again this year) and you really have to have been to one of these performances to see the range of fans they do have, they always have sell out tours and no-body leaves the shows un happy....so i think people should just button up sometimes about how BAD they are. Because if they were THAT bad they wouldn't be where they are today. Criticise that answer if you will, but i feel it's unfair to disregard the fact that they have to be good to make the mark that they have in the music industry. I also agree with the beatles comment, they beat one of the beatles records in fact :)

The irony is her album is released the same day as Myley Cyrus I detect a little competition? what do you think?

Pleasently surprised but i REALLY liked that :o

I think this is possibly the worst follow up single in pop history. Nothing like the first one!