I ❤ JustinBieber

Absolutely they are and that is certainly something I do not for one moment support or condone, I have never said such things and were anyone to say them in my company they would get a dressing down from me, I state for the record that I would never endorse such comments I admire the hard working immigrants who come here, get a job, make an effort, they could teach our homegrown people a lot when it comes to work ethic, my "corner shop" stays open till 11pm, it opens at 5.30am, they work incredibly long hours and the lads chip in when they get back from college, such people deserve my admiration. I think Britain needs some immigration but the time has come where only those that fit a certain criteria (skilled in fixed professions/wealthy enough to start businesses in UK) should be allowed to come into this country to live.

Italians were like us originally, white skinned, blonde/brown/dark hair, blue/brown/green eyes etc and thanks to inter breeding with the Moors they became dark skinned with dark hair and in general brown eyes, now that is not to say that there is anything wrong with having dark skin but the moors completely changed the Italian indigenous DNA to the point where it is now and they are dark skinned With uncontrolled immigration and less and less indigenous white stock there is a serious chance if we were transported into 2510AD-3000AD that we will see the genetic make up has changed thanks to immigration and the subsequent inter breeding to the point where every Briton has dark skin like has happened in Italy now, uncontrolled immigration could lead to that, the literal destruction of the white anglo saxon DNA/bloodline centuries down the line It is not racist to have concerns about that and to want Britain to maintain its genetic make up and anglo saxon identity.

it is not racist at all it is just a realistic assessment of what could happen if immigration gets out of control and the predicted 20% non indigenous thing is reached. You are seeing racism that isn't there Like it or not Britain has been white anglo saxon indigenous for thousands of years and it is not racist to want Britain to maintain that for thousands more years while at the same time encouraging law abiding hard working ethnic stock But the more immigration grows and the more the non indigenous population grows the more there will simply be inter breeding and over time that will completely erode thousands of years of indigenous white population, we really could have a situation centuries along the line like we had with the moors that almost all Italians are part moor, do you really have no problem with Britain losing thosands of years of ethnicity ? It is not racist to have concerns

If I had my way we would not allow any more EU immigrants either unless they meet a very strict criteria, I am not into all this "British jobs for British workers" crap, it is up to British workers to apply harder and sell themselves better to employers as opposed to blaming immigrants but it is not good for this country's identity to allow the floodgates to immigrants from wherever they may be. In some ways immigration is a good thing, without immigration we would not have curry houses, we would not have pizza parlours, we would not have the wonderful chinatown in Soho, we would not have stuff like the Notting Hill carnival, all those kind of things are positives to come out of multi culturalism and the rise of ethnic stock in this country. We have seen a lot of bad sides too, such as arranged marriages, Eastern European criminal gangs, a rise in voodoo and in African preachers abusing and "exorcism" of "possessed" kids, those kind of things are the bad side of immigration as are growing islamic radicalism, inner city gang culture, knife crime and gun crime etc, multi culturalism is a failed concept as there are too many down sides to it Britain must retain its cultural identity and put the indigenous population and its centuries of culture first, it has been a white anglo saxon culture for centuries upon centuries, as long as immigrants first and second generation stay within their own cultures in terms of breeding then that is great but with immigration ever increasing and immigrant stock increasing at vast levels immigration and the multi cultural experiment a few generations down the line could change the indigenous white British bloodline forever thanks to inter-breeding of races whereas Britain needs to maintain and retain its identity (see the Moors in Italy for an example of that, the same could happen here in a couple of centuries if immigration is allowed to grow uncontrolled, inter breeding caused a complete genetic shift and the same could happen here) I don't think that immigration and multi culturalism is a bad thing in essence as long as Britain retains its identity and with 20% of citizens in the future forecast to be immigrant or from immigrant stock there is a serious danger of Britain losing its identity

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11419937 The IMF has given resounding support to Cameron

I think that most of the concerns about immigration are about non EU migrants particularly muslims and africans, I do not get the impression that there is a great dislike of EU migrants but there is in society a lot of islamophobia and similarly a considerable dislike of black immigrants. I believe in equality hence why I would like to clamp down heavily on EU and non EU immigrants entering the country equally but sadly it is not possible with the EU immigrants so it must be done with the non EU ones

Of course the death of her uncle is sad but she should be judged entirely on how she performs in the live finals as opposed to her personal life but the way the media are reporting every aspect of her life while at the same time ignoring the other contestants shows to me that this years winner has been decided before she has even sung a note in the live finals thanks to media manipulation Already the media have reported she had sex with 2 male contestants (Aiden and that blonde haired boy who's name I can't remember) to give her a "cool" image They have reported about her weight They have reported about her sore throat (there are a lot of colds going about it would be a miracle of nature if at least 1 other contestant doesn't have an illness atm) They have reported about her uncle dying, sad though it is it all adds to the "heroic Cher" image that they are trying to build up about her I just know in the live finals when she is maybe in a bit of trouble she will go "And this song is dedicated to my beloved uncle Edward who will be watching over me tonight" with tears streaming down her face :rolleyes:

"Meanwhile Simon, right, has warned the contestants that he is BANNING "sob stories". Acts in previous years have, he claimed, droned on with tales of heartache to win public sympathy. He said: "What we're trying to avoid is 17-year-olds coming up with pathetic sob stories and singing songs that are too old for them in the hope that they're going to be popular. I don't want this to be a popularity contest.I think it is important that it remains a talent competition." And yet the headline next to it on The Sun website reads..... Agony for Cher as uncle dies age 34 X FACTOR favourite Cher Lloyd is grief-stricken over the sudden death of her beloved uncle Edward at the age of just 34. Singer Cher, 17 - already plagued by sore throats and feeling the pressure of the ITV1 show - is being comforted at home with her family http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showb...-hat-trick.html http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showb...actor-Cher.html So it's ok for 16 year olds to do it ? -_- -_-

Outstanding editorial by Max Hastings one of Britain's most respected and experienced journalists, echoed in far better terms exactly what I think, nail on the fukkin head award goes to him http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13...ailing-lid.html

X Factor this year is so rigged for Cher to win that they are making it blatant now, might as well call off the contest Day after day sob story after sob story is being leaked about her, first her frailness then her throat and now the death of her uncle, all planted out there by Cowell/Clifford in order to get the public to feel sympathetic towards her, chances of her being voted out by the judges in a bottom 2 shootout are zero, X Factor = karaoke WWF

They should change the rules to the best 12 acts regardless of who or what they are and scrap the catergories, if no groups are good enough then tough $h!t none of them get in the finals, if 11 girls and 1 boy or vice versa are the best 12 then so be it, it's ridiculous that some amazing talents fall bybthe wayside to accommodate a quota system

Not so sure, look at last year a rock week and a Queen week, neither ever happened before and both were without doubt bought in because Simon was mentoring Jamie Archer who was in his mid 30's, think he was 37 or something plus Simon bent the rules to let him sing a U2 song in big band week, he seemed to be taking Jamie very seriously last year

Wonder if she will have a relapse at Rock Week if there is one this year ;) Think the voice is the last thing she needs to worry about, she needs a good few meals inside her, Victoria Beckham is Vanessa Feltz compared with her :o

This Katie girl can't half sing :o

Cher will monopolise the Cheryl Cole fan, chav and youth vote for the early rounds but she is very much like marmite and I think that will harm her in the long run in X Factor

Last night was bizarre though, that stuff about Oprah Winfrey/Michael Jordan/Tiger Woods, it was almost a parody of hip hop hard to take her seriously, it was almost Jade Goody-esque seeing her trying to name 3 famous black people to include in a rework of an indie rock song :mellow: :huh:

What happens with someone who is a member of the union and pays this levy and is also a member of the Labour party does he get TWO votes ?

In terms of Tories the only one I can remember in the last 20 years that is as good at speech making as Cameron is Heseltine, I admit Heseltine is a bit better than Cameron but Cameron is a great speech maker

For about 3 days yes, Cameron is the greatest UK political orator of his generation so his speech will be far better than Miliband's so when Cameron makes his speech we will regain the lead again

Just because I got one thing wrong doesn't mean I get everything wrong ;) The election result was unfortunate but I remember the stick I got in the run up to 1992 when I said Major would win the election when every pundit and workmate said Kinnock had it in the bag, I was right :)

I like Storm tbh, he is a way better singer than Jamie Archer, Archer screaming his way through Get it On last year was dire beyond belief, Storm is very good albeit a bit too polished I like underdogs tbh which is why I would love to have a winner of X Factor who both has talent but is also not a professional/highly experienced singer

Cameron will 100% get in again, this time without the need for the Lib Dems, come the next election the economy will be growing again, tax cuts will be given to the middle classes, the debt will be almost non existent, the tabloids will destroy Ed I think Cameron will get in with a majority of about 70

But a lot of those were union members who are not members of the Labour party, union members are probably a mixture of all 3 parties so why should a tory or a lib dem get a vote in deciding who becomes Labour leader ? If 30,000 more MEMBERS had voted for Ed then that is fine I am delighted at the result, best possible result for the tories bar Diane Abbott winning the leadership so I have no complaints about the result but the system labour have is retarded

Storm is a professional singer, has done backing vocals for the likes of Meatloaf and several other artists so he is already a polished performer, not really the type of singing into a hairbrush in the bedroom/singing in the shower sort of thing which X Factor should really be about, someone who has performed on stage infront of 50,000 people is not really what X Factor should be about

Unthinkable Avatar Will add more later