I ❤ JustinBieber

Depends on how "high value" the target is, if it is someone right up on the wanted list and the chance to take them out may well be a one off then yes, whatever it takes

A lot of the ones used in Iraq by government ministers were, most were owned by Ba'ath people, that situation kinda happened, it wasn't Chemical Ali it was a senior figure and the Americans bombed a restaurant with 47 deaths but I was giving that scenario as an example of what Israeli commanders have to face to take out top Hamas people

Suppose you were an American helicopter gunship commander in Iraq war, you get intelligence that Chemical Ali is in a restaurant having a meal and you get confirmed sightings, the restaurant is packed with say 70 diners, the glass is bullet proof and the only way to take out Chemical Ali is by wiping out the entire restaurant with a missile from the gunship, would you give the order to fire ? I know I would in a heartbeat and sensibly Israeli commanders have done the same thing with the top Hamas people

If there is direct intelligence that a dangerous terrorist is in a particular building then it is irresponsible not to take him out regardless of if he is the only one in the building or not, Palestinian terrorist leaders used to also hole out in hospitals, baby milk factories etc, other deaths to take out a terrorist leader are unfortunate but a necessary evil

Shells go astray and hit the wrong target, missiles can hit wrong targets, it happens, we have done it many a time, the yanks have done it more times than can care to remember, its one of those things If Israel had an agenda of genocide they could wipe out the entire population of Gaza and West Bank in a day

I had never heard of that incident and was/am not in a position to comment on it, I suspect again that the death toll is exaggerated by the left wing media

Death totals that are put about by left wing media organisations, pressure groups, anti Israel organisations with an agenda and other groups never bear any resemblance to the actual total, I remember once the Guardian put up a death total after fighting in a Palestinian camp and the total that was put about was 3 times that of the final total confirmed by the UN, if a media organisation says 500 dead assume it to be about 150 Even the BBC the other day reported 18 dead on that ship and the final total was 9

Constant tension with Israel, West Bank being used to fire rockets into Israeli cities, strong links with Iran (Iran today offering to escort aid ships for example), Hamas links with Iran and Al Qaeda etc I regard Palestine as a rogue terrorist state and until all people are moved out of the West Bank and Gaza Israeli citizens won't be able to live in safety

They could easily go to Egypt and Jordan for example Unfair to compare with those men, no one need die, 7 days is quite sufficient time As for the US no chance, jewish money was pulled out of America and jewish run/owned businesses shut down Hollywood would die overnight, the movie industry would cease to exist virtually as would the media as would most of the banking system and much more, jews have America in its pocket $ wise

What I would do if I was Netanyahu is bring things to a head, I would launch a full scale invasion of Gaza and West Bank and give every Palestinian and leftie activist 7 days to leave Gaza and West Bank and guarantee the safety of those that do so, anyone who does not leave after 7 days would be assumed to be an enemy combatant and arrested or shot. The Palestinian problem needs addressing once and for all

No citizens who are not terrorists are TARGETED by Israeli forces, Palestinian terrorists are notorious for using human shields so 20 can get killed along with the terrorist or some civilians can get caught in crossfire or some twats can find it funny to throw rocks at soldiers so inevitably there is civilian casualties but they are not the target, terrorists are If a terrorist holes up in a building with 30 hostages/human shields does it make sense to just let him live and leave him alone to kill Israelis ? course not, it is necessary to still blow up the building

They were on a mission to commit mass murder though, I don't see anything wrong in celebrating the failure of their mission, live by the sword die by the sword

Only this morning 6 Palestinian terrorists tried to launch an attack on Israel creeping in what they thought would be un-noticed to kill Israelis but Israel were too smart for them and killed the lot

Do Led Zeppelin count ? Probably the greatest rock group ever, influenced an entire genre and never had a Top 20 hit and even never had a hit at all until a decade after splitting

I think at his age he is more looking forward to tending to his garden on Sandbanks and saw the end of his contract at the end of the 2011/12 season as time to retire I still think he feels that way

I think there is only 1 job he would leave Everton for and that is Utd

ROFL true :lol: :lol:

I have to agree with that editorial tbh particularly the type of people on board and the description of Hamas, both of them were spot on tbh Plus they are spot on with the bit about the aid, Israel deliver 15m tons a WEEK to Gaza, this was just thugs and savages after a ruck with Israel and they got it Part of me wishes they had done what the French did with Rainbow warrior and sunk the ship, international outrage yes but would have sent a clear signal to other lefties that fancied a ruck in the future

I can't think of a single positive for Harry in taking the job Liverpool with their financial crisis would leave Harry with little to spend, we are in the Top 10 cash rich clubs in Europe, we have a stable board whereas Liverpool is run by 2 spivs who's heart is not in the club The Liverpool now is not the Liverpool of the Shankly/Paisley days it is a big name only, bit like Williams F1 lives on name only these days Harry would be mad to take the job he is onto a good thing at Spurs, can't see why he would take a backwards step

Liverpool forums reckon that Harry is heavily in the flame, utterly ridiculous claim 1) Spurs are cash rich Liverpool are up to their eyeballs in debt 2) Spurs are in the CL and Liverpool ain't 3) Overall Spurs have a much better squad bar Torres, Gerrard and a couple of others 4) Harry lives on south coast and refuses to move, he would have to leave his house at 3am to get to training 5) Harry is employed by The Sun, Liverpool fans would love that :mellow:

Even when Ariel Sharon was demolishing settlements on the West Bank etc the Palestinians were still blowing up buses and firing rockets, Sharon was a party to the Roadmap To Peace, when Sharon was incapacitated Olmert took a much tougher line with the Palestinians and Lebanon but Palestinian actions have been anthing but peaceful even when Israel was prepared to talk peace, you can't reason with terrorist scum

And firing rockets into a nation's towns and cities isn't against international law ? and blowing up commuter buses in Tel Aviv is not against international law like the Palestinians have done many times ?. Palestine's actions were a declaration of war and war is a dirty business so until Palestine start obeying international law I don't see why Israel should

I can assure you I have far better things to do with my time tbh especially as I have no desire to get a ban again, I back up everything I say and my reasoning for it even if you find my reasoning flawed, I am hardly Crazy Chris

How on earth is it racist ? Is referring to a Scotsman as a jock or a sweaty racist ? Terms I use regularly even with scots friends, is referring to an American as a yank racist ? are Americans who refer to us as limey's racist ? The idea that calling an Irishman a Mick is racist I'd beyond absurd, it's s term I have been using for 30 years, not remotely racist

Israel said that it will allow essential supplies, it allowed 15m tons of aid through a week prior to last weekend, all it wants to do Is inspect the cargos for weapons and so on, totally fair IMHO when the Palestinians are in armed conflict with Israel