Because like i have said, CHC does not glean ANY info from Buzzjack, SIMPLE AS.

Your mistaken or uninformed about that.

There have been weeks when we get midweeks from our own source, not haven or any other place, but in a few minutes they appear in chc warts and all without BJ source.

 

I've alreadly told you where we souce our info from. You fail to understand that it is particulalry your attitude which rubs people up the wrong way - being patronising and attempting to sound superior because of your position is not the way to go.

Well I will let others comment on that. What they tell me is completely the reverse that it's chc attitude that rubs them up.

 

I cannot make this any clearer - CHC does not seek to compete with buzzjack, nor does it seek to damage Buzzjack in any way.

So why was Jester suspended today? :unsure:

 

And JESTER was not banned today, an Admin chose to suspend his account until the duration of the chart announcements, for reasons Jester I'm sure understands (whether he agrees with them or not) - he was not banned (unlike other CHC members in such a derogatory and spiteful way).

What chc member is banned from BJ? I can count the number of banned BJ members on one hand, and to my knowledge none of them are or have been chc members.

Do you mean Dubs? :unsure: Although is she not banned from chc also? :unsure:

 

Jester does not understand why he was suspended, nor do other mods and members here. To say some are annoyed is an understatement. Why if you are sharing would you ban a BJ mod from visiting chc?

I would urgue you to not suspend members without at least given then a reason.

 

That's not helping harmony at all.

This has soooooooooo deviated from the main topic in hand :rofl:

Your mistaken or uninformed about that.

There have been weeks when we get midweeks from our own source, not haven or any other place, but in a few minutes they appear in chc warts and all without BJ source.

 

Well I will let ours comment on that. What they tell me is completely the reverse that it's chc attitude that rubs them up.

 

So why was Jester suspended today? :unsure:

 

What chc member is banned from BJ? I can count the number of banned BJ members on one hand, and to my knowledge none of them are or have been chc members.

Do you mean Dubs? :unsure: Although is she not banned from chc also? :unsure:

 

Jester does not understand why he was suspended, nor do other mods and members here. To say some are annoyed is an understatement. Why if you are sharing would you ban a BJ mod from visiting chc?

I would urgue you to not suspend members without at least given then a reason.

 

That's not helping harmony at all.

 

 

1) I have never seen a midweeks thread on CHC that was copied from BJ. Always sourced from other places.

 

2) People on CHC do not talk to their posters the way you personally do. You are very rude, patronising and intimidating. That's my impression, I can't speak for others. Posters on CHC do not treat posters who post both there and on BJ with the same disrespect. There's no doubt about that.

 

3) Jester knows why.

 

4) Did you not ban any CHC members today? I was fairly certain that you did.

 

5) I have explained our position - we have good relations with all other music forums, EXCEPT Buzzjack, and that is not our choice. If you are seriously saying it is a huge issue on Buzzjack, then you need to put things in perspective. Our Sunday chart info in the past has been taken at a moments notice, but that is no longer permitted. It should not be reproduced until after the Sunday xcharts are revealed (ie. 7pm). And i would argue with you that you not be so condescending and self-righteuous when you address other people. It puts you in a very bad light. You are attempting to make it appear that CHC has an issue with Bj, when the situation is in fact the total reverse. Stop the rivalry and stop the complete disrespect, and you'll find that all sites can exist in harmony.

Edited July 10, 200619 yr by J Man

This has soooooooooo deviated from the main topic in hand :rofl:

 

 

I know, my apologies - but e-motion seems to be pressing the issue.

Before either of you think i'm stirring this, i'm not.

 

Can I ask which CHC member was banned today? :unsure: We have a list of banned people and why they're banned and no one has appeared on it today. :unsure:

 

Also, Johnny, I have no idea what you're talking about when you say Ricky is intimidating, put it this way, he even argues in the case to KEEP people like Dubs, Charis etc, when everyone else wants them banned at a moments notice.

 

Not being funny, but could you perhaps find an example of him being intimidating, if I am proved wrong then I will be the first to admit it, but I just don't see it anywhere... :unsure:

Before either of you think i'm stirring this, i'm not.

 

Can I ask which CHC member was banned today? :unsure: We have a list of banned people and why they're banned and no one has appeared on it today. :unsure:

 

Also, Johnny, I have no idea what you're talking about when you say Ricky is intimidating, put it this way, he even argues in the case to KEEP people like Dubs, Charis etc, when everyone else wants them banned at a moments notice.

 

Not being funny, but could you perhaps find an example of him being intimidating, if I am proved wrong then I will be the first to admit it, but I just don't see it anywhere... :unsure:

 

 

Last Sunday's chart thread which he moved to the admin forum for "evaluation by independeyt parties" simply because a poster disagreed with him (then returned soon after). That's an example.

 

But regardless, I don't want to get into petty arguments - my one request is that this rivalry bull$h!t stop NOW. It's tiresome and counterproductive.

Edited July 10, 200619 yr by J Man

Last Sunday's chart thread which he moved to the admin forum for "evaluation by independeyt parties" simply because a poster disagreed with him (then returned soon after). That's an example.

 

But regardless, I don't want to get into petty arguments - my one request is that this rivalry bull$h!t stop NOW. It's tiresome and counterproductive.

Oh OK, more chart stuff, well he's always been nice to me anyway, and I haven't spoke to one person yet that has been remotely offended by what Ricky has said, oh well your entitled to your opinion. ^_^

Simply put, I'd like an end to the derogatory attitude and the accusatons of pilfering from BJ when CHC are guilty of no such thing. Plus an end to this imagined rivalry would be nice too.

 

 

Simply put, I'd like an end to the derogatory attitude and the accusatons of pilfering from BJ when CHC are guilty of no such thing. Plus an end to this imagined rivalry would be nice too.

Not everyone feels the same way about CHC you know Johnny, it's a very small minority of us that have a problem, and the few that DO have a problem, have already been banned from CHC, and those who do have a problem and have been banned I would not consider one of our forum respresentatives. ;)

and those who do have a problem and have been banned I would not consider one of our forum respresentatives. ;)

 

But you are neglecting the fact that e-motion has accused CHC of that very thing in this very thread. Never mind, though. I don't think anything I will say will change anything. I'll say no more.

Edited July 10, 200619 yr by J Man

But you are neglecting the fact that e-motion has accused CHC of that very thing in this very thread. Never mind, though. I don't think anything I will say will change anything. I'll say no more.

I don't think it will either.

1) I have never seen a midweeks thread on CHC that was copied from BJ. Always sourced from other places.

Okay, you have never seen it, but it happens.

The whole point in not that it happens, but the underlying feeling that makes it happen.

If people where friends this would not happen and if it did(by mistake maybe), it wouldn't even be an issue.

 

2) People on CHC do not talk to their posters the way you personally do. You are very rude, patronising and intimidating. That's my impression, I can't speak for others. Posters on CHC do not treat posters who post both there and on BJ with the same disrespect. There's no doubt about that.

Again, I can't answer that, let others.

 

 

3) Jester knows why.

When I spoke to him on msn 2 hours ago as he was leaving he did not. However he did want to know and the other mods here want to know.

I suggest you post it here, what he has been told. Clearly he didn't get the Pm or whatever it was.

 

 

4) Did you not ban any CHC members today? I was fairly certain that you did.

Interesting you use the word 'ban' when you say Jester wasn't 'banned' but 'suspended'. A chc member was temporaily suspended today. The member is informed of why. The member has posted on BJ since the suspension I'm glad to say :)

 

5) I have explained our position - we have good relations with all other music forums, EXCEPT Buzzjack, and that is not our choice. If you are seriously saying it is a huge issue on Buzzjack, then you need to put things in perspective. Our Sunday chart info in the past has been taken at a moments notice, but that is no longer permitted. It should not be reproduced until after the Sunday xcharts are revealed (ie. 7pm). And i would argue with you that you not be so condescending and self-righteuous when you address other people. It puts you in a very bad light. You are attempting to make it appear that CHC has an issue with Bj, when the situation is in fact the total reverse. Stop the rivalry and stop the complete disrespect, and you'll find that all sites can exist in harmony.

The same here, we have good (excellent relations) with all sites except chc, o and tumbleweed.

Why should the charts not be reproduced? They are credited to chc? You made out higher up the thread that you wished to share and have no rivalry, now you change your mind and wish to not to share. Doesn't that seem strange to you?

If you want to only take and never give do you see that as an agreeable situation? Is that likely to be a harmonious situation going forward?

 

Whether my comments are in good light or now, I will leave others to decide.

Simply put, I'd like an end to the derogatory attitude and the accusatons of pilfering from BJ when CHC are guilty of no such thing. Plus an end to this imagined rivalry would be nice too.

This IMHO will only end when you want to share. To give and take.

The balls in your court on that.

Okay, you have never seen it, but it happens.

The whole point in not that it happens, but the underlying deeling that makes it happen.

If people where friends this would not happen.

Again, I can't answer that, let others.

When I spoke to him on msn 2 hours ago as he was leaving he did not. However he did want to know and the other mods here want to know.

I suggest you post it here, what he has been told. Clearly he didn't get the Pm or whatever it was.

Interesting you use the word 'ban' when you say Jester wasn't 'banned' but 'suspended'. A chc member was temporaily suspended today. The member is inform of why. The member has posted on BJ since the suspension I'm gald to day :)

The same here, we have good (excellent relations) with all sites except chc, o and tumbleweed.

Why should the charts not be reproduced? They are credited to chc? You made out higher up the thread that you wished to share and have no rivalry, now you change your mind and wish to not to share. Doesn't that seem strange to you?

If you want to only take and never give do you see that as an agreeable situation? Is that likely to be a harmonious situation going forward?

 

Whether my comments are in good light or now, I will leave others to decide.

 

1) The rivalry has and always will be (it seems) instigated by Buzzjack and their obsession with being the biggest and busiest site. CHC dioes not take info from Buzzjack, FACT! Whether you believe that or not, I can't do anything about that. But you are WRONG, so STOP insinuating it.

 

2) Reasons for bannings or suspension are not posted for all and sundry to see, that is not courteous.

 

3) I saw your reasons for their suspension, and they were petty, as I've said already.

 

4) You have excellent relations with all sites BUT CHC and two other random sites? Why is that? It's not because of anything CHC has done AGAINST Buzzjack in the last few months. All of the pettiness has been directed at US (ie. Midweeks, Multicharts etc)

 

5) We have been (up til now) happy to share our info with everyone, but Buzzjack abused that. And you know it's true.

Edited July 10, 200619 yr by J Man

This IMHO will only end when you want to share. To give and take.

The balls in your court on that.

 

 

Oh please stop it. You sound so patronising.

Edited July 10, 200619 yr by J Man

 

 

I don't think it will either.

 

A shame. :( And does this e-motion guy like to have the last word EVERY time?

 

A shame. :( And does this e-motion guy like to have the last word EVERY time?

Well seemingly so, but to be fair Johnny so do you. ;)

Well seemingly so, but to be fair Johnny so do you. ;)

 

 

Well my weakness is that i have to talk things out til there's an understanding, even if someone else is just trying to tiewst or complicate matters, I agree. :lol:

 

But I am in the right here, I'm certain of it. I wish i didn't have to press home my point, but e-motion seems to have willed it.

Edited July 10, 200619 yr by J Man

Well my weakness is that i have to talk things out til there's an understanding, even if someone else is just trying to tiewst or complicate matters, I agree. :lol:

 

But I am in the right here, I'm certain of it. I wish i didn't have to press home my point, but e-motion seems to have willed it.

Oh I was about to say, you're both guilty of the same thing. :lol:

 

I'm the same too, I don't see this ending amicably unfortunately, so you could be here a while. :lol:

 

I'm the same too, I don't see this ending amicably unfortunately, so you could be here a while. :lol:

 

 

Nah, I've said enough. I just find it really frustrating when peole are so petty. Cest la vie.