Jump to content

Featured Replies

Thanks vidcapper! Could you do this also for 2009 vs 2010?
  • Replies 30
  • Views 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Author
Interesting figures, the top 10 as far as singles go in the UK has definitley changed drastically, i'd be even more curious to know the increase in sales % from 2004/05 vs 2010, seeing as how recentley some acts have had to sell over 30k just to peak at #10 when back in 04/05 thats how much the average #10 single sold in its entire chart life.

 

Unfortunately I have far too little sales info for 2004/05 to do that calculation.

  • Author
Thanks vidcapper! Could you do this also for 2009 vs 2010?

 

Here you go :

 

Pos % Incr.

1 43.99

2 74.89

3 77.21

4 76.31

5 76.47

6 73.16

7 72.42

8 73.17

9 72.13

10 74.40

 

15 67.56

 

20 66.32

 

30 73.77

 

40 63.21

 

50 59.59

 

75 47.32

 

100 45.78

 

125 43.21

 

150 43.78

 

175 44.28

 

200 45.34

 

Without.

Thanks, that's what I was looking for.

 

So using your figures:-

 

Bleeding Love would have sold 430,000 in its first week and be well on its way to 2 million in total, and

Run would have sold approx 250,000 first week and be over a million already.

Here you go :

 

Pos % Incr.

1 43.99

2 74.89

3 77.21

4 76.31

5 76.47

6 73.16

7 72.42

8 73.17

9 72.13

10 74.40

 

15 67.56

 

20 66.32

 

30 73.77

 

40 63.21

 

50 59.59

 

75 47.32

 

100 45.78

 

125 43.21

 

150 43.78

 

175 44.28

 

200 45.34

 

:unsure:

 

2008->current average for #150 has a 11.58% increase, yet 2009->2010 for the same position (#150) has a 43.78% increase, how has that happened? Did average sales @ #150 drop from 2008->2009 and then increase from 2009->2010?

  • Author
:unsure:

 

2008->current average for #150 has a 11.58% increase, yet 2009->2010 for the same position (#150) has a 43.78% increase, how has that happened? Did average sales @ #150 drop from 2008->2009 and then increase from 2009->2010?

 

My 2008 figures are less reliable, especially lower down the chart, so this is unlikely to be a real anomaly.

My 2008 figures are less reliable, especially lower down the chart, so this is unlikely to be a real anomaly.

Thanks. Thought it looked odd!

 

Could your data do a "sales curve" for Bleeding Love and Run, assuming they had been released in Q4 2009 (say 19 October 2009) and give the total sales to date?

  • Author
Thanks. Thought it looked odd!

 

Could your data do a "sales curve" for Bleeding Love and Run, assuming they had been released in Q4 2009 (say 19 October 2009) and give the total sales to date?

 

I'm not really sure what you mean, here.

Sorry, I wasn’t clear :unsure:

 

What I meant was:-

 

Bleeding Love had the following sales pattern:-

 

Week	Chart Date	Position	Sales

1 28-Oct-07 1 218,805

2 04-Nov-07 1 158,370

3 11-Nov-07 1 111,978

4 18-Nov-07 1 74,549

5 25-Nov-07 1 57,954

6 02-Dec-07 1 40,530

7 09-Dec-07 1 29,616

8 16-Dec-07 2 27,744

9 23-Dec-07 3 30,897

10 30-Dec-07 2 37,170

11 06-Jan-08 3 17,883

12 13-Jan-08 12 11,268

13 20-Jan-08 17 8,741

14 27-Jan-08 16 7,343

15 03-Feb-08 28 5,668

16 10-Feb-08 33 4,810

 

And then went:- 37

33 -33 -41 -40 -43 -38 -45 -53 -54 -69 -68 -76 -92 -88 -92 -108 -109 -103 -87 -92 before bobbing around the 100-150 mark ad infinitum.

 

If it had been released on say, 19 October 2009 (i.e. 2 years after its original release date), and using the above sales, chart run, and your sales % uplifts, what would it have sold?

 

  • Author
Sorry, I wasn’t clear :unsure:

 

What I meant was:-

 

Bleeding Love had the following sales pattern:-

 

Week	Chart Date	Position	Sales

1 28-Oct-07 1 218,805

2 04-Nov-07 1 158,370

3 11-Nov-07 1 111,978

4 18-Nov-07 1 74,549

5 25-Nov-07 1 57,954

6 02-Dec-07 1 40,530

7 09-Dec-07 1 29,616

8 16-Dec-07 2 27,744

9 23-Dec-07 3 30,897

10 30-Dec-07 2 37,170

11 06-Jan-08 3 17,883

12 13-Jan-08 12 11,268

13 20-Jan-08 17 8,741

14 27-Jan-08 16 7,343

15 03-Feb-08 28 5,668

16 10-Feb-08 33 4,810

 

And then went:- 37

33 -33 -41 -40 -43 -38 -45 -53 -54 -69 -68 -76 -92 -88 -92 -108 -109 -103 -87 -92 before bobbing around the 100-150 mark ad infinitum.

 

If it had been released on say, 19 October 2009 (i.e. 2 years after its original release date), and using the above sales, chart run, and your sales % uplifts, what would it have sold?

 

Sorry - I'm afraid my spreadsheet can't do that.

Sorry - I'm afraid my spreadsheet can't do that.

Ah ok, no worries, I'll have a go myself, try and work it out :blush:

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.