There's nothing wrong with the MF format. :angry:

I'm not talking about the MF format tho.

Bre uve even confused me the format here is fine and in correlation to mf no?

Yeah it is the MF format. The winners of duels 1 & 2 and 3 & 4 will then be put against each other respectively and we'll have our qualifiers!

 

winner duel 1 vs winner duel 2 -> finalen

winner duel 3 vs winner duel 4 -> finalen

 

bye

Yeah it is the MF format. The winners of duels 1 & 2 and 3 & 4 will then be put against each other respectively and we'll have our qualifiers!

 

winner duel 1 vs winner duel 2 -> finalen

winner duel 3 vs winner duel 4 -> finalen

 

bye

 

The difference being MF actually has another voting round whereas this doesn't. Either of the duel winners could still win the second duel in MF, whereas in this only the winner of the group of 4 has a chance as the 2nd duel is worked out immediately. So it seems misleading to present it in a way that makes it seem winning a duel means anything.

 

The format is perfectly fine, but it's functionally 2 groups of 4, so why present it as if it isn't?

Because it's more FUN this way god

How is it though. It literally makes no difference other than making it misleading.

 

(investing too much time arguing about this do carry on)