Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author

I am utterly speechless at Nicola's behaviour to Kim. I agree that if she was aware of Kim's past then that has to be the most horrible thing I've heard said on Big Brother. Either way she is a vile woman. I agree with Jack in the other thread - what a difference an episode makes! I was warming to her again but good god :/

 

Stacy's time really has to be up too, but I think Nicola will at the expense of Stacy, Jamie or Jessica (obv two ofthem) because she is so prominent in all the drama.

  • Replies 820
  • Views 26.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The thing is for Nicola to even say "you don't have kids" must have meant that the conversation of whether Kim had children or not must have come up at some point in order for her to be so sure that she didn't have children. That obviously doesn't mean by any means Kim has said anything but it does make it more likely that she may have opened up about it as its certain the conversation was raised. Big Brother probably wouldn't air such a conversation anyway due to its personal nature and the fact that it would obviously have taken away from the fun mood of the highlights show.

 

Either way it was a disgustingly vile comment to make, if she did not know it is completely below the belt to try and attack a 75 year old woman for being childless to win your argument.

 

Truly horrid stuff. I would have liked to have seen her removed for it but I doubt it will even be mentioned again.

  • Author
Yeah I think the look on her face and the way she specified she could "go lower" means she knew. But yeah even if not, a truly vile remark to make. Apparently on BOTS they just glossed over it and pretending the trending thing on social media for the night was Jamie and Bianca :/
Yeah I think the look on her face and the way she specified she could "go lower" means she knew. But yeah even if not, a truly vile remark to make. Apparently on BOTS they just glossed over it and pretending the trending thing on social media for the night was Jamie and Bianca :/

 

The BOTS lot are awful though, they seemed more upset that Kim had called Nicole a "liar", which apparently is a horrid thing to say. The stupid bunch of ADULTERERS.

  • Author
The BOTS lot are awful though, they seemed more upset that Kim had called Nicole a "liar", which apparently is a horrid thing to say. The stupid bunch of ADULTERERS.

I haven't watched said shit show in a good few years now :drama:

I haven't watched said shit show in a good few years now :drama:

 

You're probably better off, I watch it on or off, but usually have to turn it off because of impressionists or daft vicars.

Channel 5 are so, so embarrassing. Do they REALLY think anybody actually gives one iota of a f*** about Jamie and Bonca?
  • Author
Also lol at James nominating Kim for not bothering with people, honey you sit on your arse in that grey cardie all day acting above dressing up for tasks :lol:

Can we appreciate the return of the Kim one liners again this evening.

 

"You'd make a wonderful town crier"

"As they say in America, you're two tomatoes short of a salad girl"

 

Cementing herself as an absolute Big Brother legend again :lol:

I think it is definitely Stacy vs Jamie tonight. I suppose Jessica has an outside chance of going but I really really hope not.

 

Can we do a double and get rid of them both? They are both bringing the show down, along with Mean McLean.

I don't know how but I completely missed the childless comment.. I am going to have to go back and watch it. If she said it knowing Kim's history, there's no argument that that is disgusting.

 

However, I do think people are not seeing Kim's game. This is a separate point and in no way justifies anything that low being said to Kim. But I do think she is playing dirty tactics. Her only response when Nicola asked for examples were 'I don't have to tell you, you should take the nomination on the chin like I do, shut up'.... I genuinely don't believe Nicola has a problem with the nomination, she didn't with Speidi's and she would have to be the most deluded housemate of all time not to expect it from Kim.. she had a problem with the fact Kim had gone in there and made up a complete untruth. That's a dirty tactic and Kim quite clearly had no examples to give. Nicola - if anything - is more honest than she needs to be. You could see on the other housemates faces that they were confused, Kim hasn't said to anyone that Nicola has lied about her until that moment.. I know I would want an explanation too as trying to deceive the public with an untruth is not cool. Not a problem with taking the nomination on the chin, but a lie as a reason is going to rile you.

 

That all said, obviously Nicola didn't come across well yesterday and neither did Stacy.

I think people are assuming the worst because they already dislike Nicola. If (and that's honestly a big if given there's no evidence to back this up) Nicola knew about Kim's past, then of course it's no question that it was way below the belt and says a lot about her.

 

But, I think people are overreacting big time if that's not the case. When someone is criticizing you as a parent and saying you shouldn't act a certain way because you're a parent I think it's a very valid response to say "and you're not a parent" as in - what do you know about how I should or should not behave when you don't even have children of your own.

 

I really don't get this witch hunt for Nicola. The Big Brother fan community always confuses me so much because some of the comments made towards Nicola have been wayyyy worse than what she said.

I haven't watched said shit show in a good few years now :drama:

You're probably better off, I watch it on or off, but usually have to turn it off because of impressionists or daft vicars.

I've stopped watching BOTS now apart from on eviction nights so I can watch the interviews with Emma and the evicted housemate but I normally switch off after that. I know it wasn't the most amazing show to start off with but its just turned into garbage. It has the same old 15 or so audience members who always get picked for their opinion (and you can always guarantee that those two sisters will disagree with each other) and its just attracting the most dullest '''celebrity''' panel, who all appear once a week and a random person from TOWIE is guaranteed to be a member of the panel every day.

 

They've got rid of all the actual interesting bits, so there's zero extra insight into the program (e.g. a look at tasks, plans for live shows) that they used to have and also no actual insight into the actual housemates. They've stripped back the psychology elements completely to like one night a week and would rather have Dr Dance, the Vicar and newspaper headlines which all contribute nothing. Dr Dance was funny the first time but its a bit tired after 20 times of doing it. Its just a whole load of filler now, there's no need for a musical entrance from Rylan each episode and there's no need for a weekend recap either.

 

It needs a massive overhaul because, at the moment, the makers of the show just seem to be asking themselves 'how can we waste an hour of TV'.

  • Author

I'm pretty sure tonight will be a double,they need one to get on track with numbers. There are 10 days left and 11 housemates left, so to be left with 6 housemates we'd need two doubles and a single. Although I guess they could do a single today, and doubles on Friday and next Tuesday just before the final. I think this will be the double though given they've made the decision to have everyone with one nomination up. That feels to me like they're trying to get rid of a couple of the deadwood housemates or ones that have run their course, given Jamie and Stacy are the two most likely candidates. I think Jessica might be ok because she's coming across really well, Jamie might get the Love Island sort of vote that's he's "fit" and the young female viewers may like the romance though so she might fall below him :/

 

I think people are assuming the worst because they already dislike Nicola. If (and that's honestly a big if given there's no evidence to back this up) Nicola knew about Kim's past, then of course it's no question that it was way below the belt and says a lot about her.

 

But, I think people are overreacting big time if that's not the case. When someone is criticizing you as a parent and saying you shouldn't act a certain way because you're a parent I think it's a very valid response to say "and you're not a parent" as in - what do you know about how I should or should not behave when you don't even have children of your own.

 

I really don't get this witch hunt for Nicola. The Big Brother fan community always confuses me so much because some of the comments made towards Nicola have been wayyyy worse than what she said.

Perhaps, but I think regardless using childlessness against a 75 year old woman just to win an argument is still pretty low.

BOTS is great and Rylan is very good at what he does. The panelists are quite good! I love all of the exclusives we get on tasks/twists and nominations

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.