Graham understands what i'm on about. :lol:

I think I understand, unless you haven't said :unsure: It's just difficult to discuss with someone who doesn't want to budge :rofl:

:lol: I kinda understand what your on about, in a way with the whole Dubs thing, thats all really :P

Im off now anyway but i'll be back later

I'm going to try and make this post as nice as possible without getting annoyed. :P

 

I won't budge on this subject, because i'm right, if i'm wrong i'll admit it and apologise, but i'm not wrong. It's not just me who's realised it, everyone knows that we're ignored, despite us doing best part of the dirty work around here. It does get frustrating because you put so much into a site and you hope that the work you've done will earn you some respect and get people to listen to you and your opinions, but all of this proves it doesn't. At the end of the day, they're the Gods and we're the workers, a barrier which I detest.

I'm going to try and make this post as nice as possible without getting annoyed. :P

 

I won't budge on this subject, because i'm right, if i'm wrong i'll admit it and apologise, but i'm not wrong. It's not just me who's realised it, everyone knows that we're ignored, despite us doing best part of the dirty work around here. It does get frustrating because you put so much into a site and you hope that the work you've done will earn you some respect and get people to listen to you and your opinions, but all of this proves it doesn't. At the end of the day, they're the Gods and we're the workers, a barrier which I detest.

You did it :cheer: :lol: That didn't sound unreasonable at all that time ^_^

 

I agree 100%. We do work hard for the site and you would think that as well as becoming a part of the community it would also earn you the opportunity to air your views and have them taken on board. Though I know the admin DO do this, it's plainly clear that a lot of the time they don't -_-

 

At the same time, I agree with the admin that someone can't be banned until they're warned etc. because that's the way the site is run and the ideas Phil first put in place. They're a bit too rigid on this at times, but then Ricky is right when he says that apart from our views, there are 5 people who need to agree and not everyone can get their way.

 

So basically, I think I should stay out of this because I clearly am quite neutral :unsure:

You did it :cheer: :lol: That didn't sound unreasonable at all that time ^_^

 

I agree 100%. We do work hard for the site and you would think that as well as becoming a part of the community it would also earn you the opportunity to air your views and have them taken on board. Though I know the admin DO do this, it's plainly clear that a lot of the time they don't -_-

 

At the same time, I agree with the admin that someone can't be banned until they're warned etc. because that's the way the site is run and the ideas Phil first put in place. They're a bit too rigid on this at times, but then Ricky is right when he says that apart from our views, there are 5 people who need to agree and not everyone can get their way.

 

So basically, I think I should stay out of this because I clearly am quite neutral :unsure:

But that's the problem, they only do listen to us when we make a fuss (i.e Dubs) which wasn't productive for anyone, Ricky banned Dubs against his will, not only because we pushed for it, but because Mikey and Mark pushed as well. I just think it's pathetic that we have to split the Management in half and cause such a huge fuss just to right a wrong that should have been righted from day 1. To be quite honest I think we need Phil back and quickly, he has experience from both here and CC which is unbelieveably valuable on this.

Hello. :arrr:

Hello. :arrr:

Hiya John, don't worry about the topic it's not worth the fuss anymore. -_-

 

How was your holiday? :D

But that's the problem, they only do listen to us when we make a fuss (i.e Dubs) which wasn't productive for anyone, Ricky banned Dubs against his will, not only because we pushed for it, but because Mikey and Mark pushed as well. I just think it's pathetic that we have to split the Management in half and cause such a huge fuss just to right a wrong that should have been righted from day 1. To be quite honest I think we need Phil back and quickly, he has experience from both here and CC which is unbelieveably valuable on this.

Well yes, I agree again, though Dubs is the only issue I really felt I needed to get involved in to make them listen tbh. And as for Phil, he may do things slightly differently but I don't think bringing him back will have that much effect in all honesty.

 

Then again, he does sometimes have this anti-"airy fairy" attitude so maybe he WOULD do something. Sometimes you just need to do something there and then, and forget about it - banning a certain member from the site isn't going to start World War 3 after all is it? -_-

The holiday was great. :cheer: I managed to visit Canterbury Cathedral which I've been meaning to do for some time. :D Both my grandparents visited there at different points in their lives. My grandfather was there during the Second World War and my grandmother paid a visit there nearly 10 years ago as a special stop on her way to France via the Tunnel. :)

 

Hello Andre. :D

Well yes, I agree again, though Dubs is the only issue I really felt I needed to get involved in to make them listen tbh. And as for Phil, he may do things slightly differently but I don't think bringing him back will have that much effect in all honesty.

 

Then again, he does sometimes have this anti-"airy fairy" attitude so maybe he WOULD do something. Sometimes you just need to do something there and then, and forget about it - banning a certain member from the site isn't going to start World War 3 after all is it? -_-

Phil does have this anti airy fairy policy, and even though i'm airy fairy at heart all of this is beating it out of me, which is why I am becoming more aggressive and more arguementative, I don't think Phil will approve of my attitude as of late, but I would discuss it with him, if he was here. But in all fairness he has internet problems so he's forgiven for that.

 

I agree Andre, and banning that certain member will cause the site to rejoice, not have a mass war. Fair enough if you ban someone like Paul, or you, or Matt, or Nicky or something, then yes we would have a war on our hands, but members that are a nuisance (sorry can't spell!) to the site will only cause the atmosphere to improve.

 

We're always talking about keeping good topics in the Lounge etc, but we can't if every other topic is about Ghetto's and what not. There has to be a balance, they can't expect the Lounge to have amazing topics with certain members with a below minus IQ floating around.

 

The holiday was great. :cheer: I managed to visit Canterbury Cathedral which I've been meaning to do for some time. :D Both my grandparents visited there at different points in their lives. My grandfather was there during the Second World War and my grandmother paid a visit there nearly 10 years ago as a special stop on her way to France via the Tunnel. :)

 

Hello Andre. :D

Glad you had a great time darl!

 

I had told Tim you were away like you asked. :P I told him in the Daydream Survivor thread, but he deleted my post for some reason... :unsure:

I also had a sandwich in Sandwich. Had to be done. :P :lol:

The holiday was great. :cheer: I managed to visit Canterbury Cathedral which I've been meaning to do for some time. :D Both my grandparents visited there at different points in their lives. My grandfather was there during the Second World War and my grandmother paid a visit there nearly 10 years ago as a special stop on her way to France via the Tunnel. :)

 

Hello Andre. :D

Hello John :D Ignore me, I was deep in discussion :lol:

 

Where did you go again? :unsure:

I also had a sandwich in Sandwich. Had to be done. :P :lol:

Is there a place called Sandwich? :o

Phil does have this anti airy fairy policy, and even though i'm airy fairy at heart all of this is beating it out of me, which is why I am becoming more aggressive and more arguementative, I don't think Phil will approve of my attitude as of late, but I would discuss it with him, if he was here. But in all fairness he has internet problems so he's forgiven for that.

 

I agree Andre, and banning that certain member will cause the site to rejoice, not have a mass war. Fair enough if you ban someone like Paul, or you, or Matt, or Nicky or something, then yes we would have a war on our hands, but members that are a nuisance (sorry can't spell!) to the site will only cause the atmosphere to improve.

 

We're always talking about keeping good topics in the Lounge etc, but we can't if every other topic is about Ghetto's and what not. There has to be a balance, they can't expect the Lounge to have amazing topics with certain members with a below minus IQ floating around.

Yes I know. Well that sounds like a nice conclusion for now :lol: Maybe we should stop talking about it on the boards, we don't want to be reprimanded for that too do we? <_<

Yes I know. Well that sounds like a nice conclusion for now :lol: Maybe we should stop talking about it on the boards, we don't want to be reprimanded for that too do we? <_<

I couldn't really care less if we were, it would only make my attitude towards this place worse, which is currently difficult to do.

 

But yeah OK. ;)

I stayed in a place near Folkestone, Kent Andre. :D

 

There is a place called Sandwich Kelly. It's on the coast south of Broadstairs and Ramsgate. :) Fabulous little place with loads of historical buildings. I am looking forward to going back there. :)

I've heard of Sandwich actually ^_^ And I think I've been to Folkestone briefly too :unsure:

 

Glad you had fun :D

Thanks Andre. :D

 

Loving the new signature Kelly. :D

Thanks Andre. :D

 

Loving the new signature Kelly. :D

Thanks darl. :D

 

How strange there's a place called sandwich. :o :lol:

:lol: Im back from my little break, one of my mates grandad has just died :(