Is that an actual suggestion or are you taking the p*ss?

probably taking the urine :coffee:.

I personally think it's disgusting to suggest the parents murdered her and it would take such people from the Sun/Mirror forums to suggest such a thing imo. Some of the suggestions I've read are so unbelievably far fetched and if you ask me people are watching too many hollywood films. I can't imagine what it must be like to be the parents and have to hear such sick accusations made. I am sure if someone said it to one of their faces they would'nt be able to contain themselfs from losing it altogether.

 

Don't be ridiculous... It would hardly be the first time a parent has killed one of their kids, there are a fair few infamous cases, such as the one in America where a woman killed her own children and then put the blame onto a random "black male", because she assumed that if she said a black guy did it, people would just automatically believe her.... <_< Pre-Meditated murder if ever there was a case, with a nasty side-order of racism as well... Hope they sent that b**ch to the Gas Chamber... <_<

 

And, I dont think it is at all disgusting to at least be highly critical of these peoples' parenting skills... A baby-sitting service ON SITE and those idiots leave their three kids in a room on their own...?? Come on..... It's all a bit suss if you ask me....

Is that an actual suggestion or are you taking the p*ss?

 

 

Yes it was suggested in several papers at the weekend.

Edited May 24, 200718 yr by coolchris

Don't be ridiculous... It would hardly be the first time a parent has killed one of their kids, there are a fair few infamous cases, such as the one in America where a woman killed her own children and then put the blame onto a random "black male", because she assumed that if she said a black guy did it, people would just automatically believe her.... <_< Premeditated murder if ever there was a case.... And a nasty side-order of racism as well.... Hope they sent that b**ch to the Gas Chamber.... <_<

 

And, I dont think it is at all disgusting to at least be highly critical of these peoples' parenting skills... A baby-sitting service ON SITE and those idiots leave their three kids in a room on their own...?? Come on..... It's all a bit suss if you ask me....

 

yup, thank you. i agree.

after reading some of these comments, im with the person who said about the parents killig the girl than they hid the body in that 45 mins, than called the police

Indeed. It seems like the obvious 'solution' to the question of what happened. I just wish they would go on tv and explain something about why they left the kids alone in an unlocked room, instead of taking them to the baby sitting service. But of course that wont happen, because the public are all so sad about the situation, to ask a probing question would give half of them a heart attack.

LMAO. I think some people in here need to stop watching so many soaps.

 

The official police theory that she was abducted from her bed is the official police theory for a reason you know: because it is the theory that is most likely and has the most proof behind it. The suggestion that one of the parents killed her in one of the 5-10 minute gaps where they went to check on her is ridiculous to say the least... do you really think in that short amount of time, they'd have chance to: kill the girl; plan out what to do to cover themselves; go somewhere sufficiently far away from the resort; dispose of the body; get back to the resort; compose themsevlves so that no-one would suspect them; re-enter the restaurant. And what about this fairly big question: WHY would middle-class people, with no criminal records, who have two other kids and so clearly want children, WANT to kill their daughter?

 

Btw, some of the posts in here are so libellous, I'm pretty sure the site could techincally be sued because of them...

Firstly - they are each our own individual suggestions and the site could not be sued, besides I'd be even more dubious about this whole thing if the parents were spending their time on Buzzjack!

 

Secondly - it is 'most likely' she was abducted but that is not what we are saying - we are saying its entirely possible the parents are in someway involved.

 

Thirdly - The fact that the parents are middle-class doesnt come into it! Anyone could be capable of murdering their child and how these two people act on the outside is no indication of what goes on behind closed doors.

 

Fourthly - They may not have WANTED to kill their daughter. I doubt that, we never suggested that, but if they were involved, it could be for a multitude of reasons. Maybe the mum/dad got angry with her for not sleeping, lashed out and hit her, and she therefore suffered a fatal blow to the head? Maybe they gave her sleeping pills that she reacted badly to and died, so they had to dispose of the body? Maybe she got in a play fight with one of her siblings which resulted in a hard head bashing and she suffered fataly, so the parents disguised it as kidnap to shift blame from the child responsible?

 

Anything could have happened, and there is something so strange about the story that has been told - it isnt right.

LMAO. I think some people in here need to stop watching so many soaps.

 

The official police theory that she was abducted from her bed is the official police theory for a reason you know: because it is the theory that is most likely and has the most proof behind it. The suggestion that one of the parents killed her in one of the 5-10 minute gaps where they went to check on her is ridiculous to say the least... do you really think in that short amount of time, they'd have chance to: kill the girl; plan out what to do to cover themselves; go somewhere sufficiently far away from the resort; dispose of the body; get back to the resort; compose themsevlves so that no-one would suspect them; re-enter the restaurant. And what about this fairly big question: WHY would middle-class people, with no criminal records, who have two other kids and so clearly want children, WANT to kill their daughter?

 

Btw, some of the posts in here are so libellous, I'm pretty sure the site could techincally be sued because of them...

 

Well if it was some random p**** then why were the 2 other kids not abducted too ?

 

I think it is very possible that she was either murdered by one of the McCann's or accidently killed and the body disposed of to not ruin their careers like one of the posters suggested

 

And as for the last bit sorry that is the most absurd thing I have ever come across that crime and murder and so on is purely a working class thing, far more battered women in this country for instance come from middle class to upper middle class houses where the stressed out at work husband beats the $h!t out of her to relieve the work tension than happens in council estates, I believe I read somewhere that 68% of all domestic violence is middle class professionals so the idea that because they are middle class they are not capable of violence of killing is absurd

LMAO. I think some people in here need to stop watching so many soaps.

 

The official police theory that she was abducted from her bed is the official police theory for a reason you know: because it is the theory that is most likely and has the most proof behind it. The suggestion that one of the parents killed her in one of the 5-10 minute gaps where they went to check on her is ridiculous to say the least... do you really think in that short amount of time, they'd have chance to: kill the girl; plan out what to do to cover themselves; go somewhere sufficiently far away from the resort; dispose of the body; get back to the resort; compose themsevlves so that no-one would suspect them; re-enter the restaurant. And what about this fairly big question: WHY would middle-class people, with no criminal records, who have two other kids and so clearly want children, WANT to kill their daughter?

Btw, some of the posts in here are so libellous, I'm pretty sure the site could techincally be sued because of them...

 

no one is saying they wanted to kill the child .... doesn't mean they didn't

 

as I said on about page 1 something about this whole story doesn't add up :unsure:

LMAO. I think some people in here need to stop watching so many soaps.

 

The official police theory that she was abducted from her bed is the official police theory for a reason you know: because it is the theory that is most likely and has the most proof behind it. The suggestion that one of the parents killed her in one of the 5-10 minute gaps where they went to check on her is ridiculous to say the least... do you really think in that short amount of time, they'd have chance to: kill the girl; plan out what to do to cover themselves; go somewhere sufficiently far away from the resort; dispose of the body; get back to the resort; compose themsevlves so that no-one would suspect them; re-enter the restaurant. And what about this fairly big question: WHY would middle-class people, with no criminal records, who have two other kids and so clearly want children, WANT to kill their daughter?

 

Btw, some of the posts in here are so libellous, I'm pretty sure the site could techincally be sued because of them...

 

 

If you think these quotes are libellous, blimey, go and look on the newspaper forums. The Sun's removing posts but the others aren't. Good. Free speech is allowed then.

Edited May 24, 200718 yr by coolchris

I'm not saying no middle-class people commit murder, but it's simply a fact of life that more murder is committed by working-class people. There's a tiny, tiny chance that the parents killed her, but it's far more likely that she was abducted. I stand by that it is highly, highly unlikely that middle-class doctors with no criminal records and who clearly love their children (they have two others, and, as evidenced, there's a huge volume of pictures of Madeleine... oh, I can just hear the "They took the photos so to make themselves look less suspicious!" claims now) would intentionally kill a child. And as for the claims of accidentally killing her... even ignoring the near-impossibility of accidentally killing your child, how did they manage to dispose of the body so quickly and how come after three weeks of intense searching in the area, the body hasn't been found (as if it was them, the body must have been disposed in the area, as there simply wouldn't have been enough time for the McCanns to do otherwise, considering their whereabouts have been pretty much 100% confirmed all the time before 10pm that night and from 10.30-45pm onwards). Which brings us back to the logical and SANE theory that she was abducted...

If you think these quotes are libellous, blimey, go and look on the newspaper forums. The Sun's removing posts but the others aren't. Good. Free speech is allowed then.

I've got no problem at all about free speech (which is why I didn't moan about the posts saying the McCanns are complete monsters for leaving the kids alone... personally, I think those claims are ott, but I recognise that everyone has a right to comment on that). But claiming they actually killed their kids when there isn't even the smallest shred of proof, not only is it totally insensitive, it IS libellous.

eh?... why would the parents WANT to kill the kid?...

 

nah.... i dont think the parents killed her accidentally or not. in fact, i dont think the parents were involved, unless they handed her over to someone... but then again... why?... it doesnt make sense.

eh?... why would the parents WANT to kill the kid?...

 

nah.... i dont think the parents killed her accidentally or not. in fact, i dont think the parents were involved, unless they handed her over to someone... but then again... why?... it doesnt make sense.

 

I agree.

 

Do those of you who think they did kill their own kid seriously think the media would have reacted to this story the way they have.

 

Answer: Not a chance. The media are far more cynical than the average person, so there is no way I believe that they would have supported the McCanns campaign if they were suspicious that they could have done this. That concept don't add up.

 

But then again I suppose those of you who think the parents killed Madeline think that MI6/The Royal Family had Princess Diana killed when she clearly died because of Al Fayed hiring a drunk Chauffeur who drove a vehicle he was not used to driving, going at too fast a speed, whilst not wearing seatbelts. (The point of impact was at the front passengers side where Diana's Bodyguard was sat. He was the only survivor probably because he was the only one wearing a seatbelt). :lol:

I'm not saying no middle-class people commit murder, but it's simply a fact of life that more murder is committed by working-class people. There's a tiny, tiny chance that the parents killed her, but it's far more likely that she was abducted. I stand by that it is highly, highly unlikely that middle-class doctors with no criminal records and who clearly love their children (they have two others, and, as evidenced, there's a huge volume of pictures of Madeleine... oh, I can just hear the "They took the photos so to make themselves look less suspicious!" claims now) would intentionally kill a child. And as for the claims of accidentally killing her... even ignoring the near-impossibility of accidentally killing your child, how did they manage to dispose of the body so quickly and how come after three weeks of intense searching in the area, the body hasn't been found (as if it was them, the body must have been disposed in the area, as there simply wouldn't have been enough time for the McCanns to do otherwise, considering their whereabouts have been pretty much 100% confirmed all the time before 10pm that night and from 10.30-45pm onwards). Which brings us back to the logical and SANE theory that she was abducted...

 

i don't believe the parents killed her at all. i think she's alive and well.

 

you seem to be saying that because they're middle class doctors with no criminal record and who love their children (love their children so much that they leave them in an unlocked room in a foreign country, might i add) that just the thought of them having something to do with madaeline's disappearance is absurd. i disagree. it's that kind of thinking which let's criminals get away (there was a case a few years ago where a single mother reported that her child had been stabbed to death to the police and, after clearing through the bull$h!t she gave, they charged her). now, i'm not saying that madaeline wasn't abducted. of course, it's most definetley a possibility. but i just feel that there's something they're keeping from us.

 

who refuses an onsite babysitter? who let's their children stay in an unlocked room alone in a foreign country for a long period of time? who waits until 45 minutes have passed to inform the police that their child is missing?

 

whatever their reasons are, i don't buy them which leads ME to think they had something to do with maddy's disappearance.

 

as i said, i don't think she's dead at all. i think they've just 'given' her away to someone who they know very well and trust.

think they've just 'given' her away to someone who they know very well and trust.[/font]

And the point in that would BE...?

And the point in that would BE...?

 

how do i know? do i live with the parents? do i know what they discuss and think? no. neither do you.

 

it doesn't mean it isn't a possibility that they were involved somehow. no sir.

To say they have her hidden away somewhere safely is just utterly ridiculous imo. What would the point in that be? What would the parents gain from doing that? Would they be doing it for money? Doubt it as they are probebly quite wealthy considering they both have very good jobs. I can see absolutelly no reason they would do something like that. And I also can see no reason how they could've killed her, and then in 15 minutes hidden her body. Have you been following the case? The entire area has been searched endlessly by experts so there is little chance in that, unless they are professional murderers. :rolleyes:

 

If you just looks at the state of that mother. She has been in bits and looks completelly drained. I can only imagine how much the parents are beating themselfs up with guilt over leaving her. They should be ashamed and I am quite sure they are. But you can clearly see the state they are in. The father to a lesser extent but thats understandable as he is a man. I would'nt mind if some of the claims that the parents were involved actually made sence but they don't, and also it is in no way suprising the other kids were'nt taken. There could've been only one person who abducted her, therfor I doubt they could've take all three of them, especially two 2 year olds who would've been screaming. And also, if claims are true that she is in Morocco then there is a chance she is being used for child labour, therfor two year olds probebly would've have been useless to these sick people.

 

Also, I checked and they called the police 15 minutes after she had gone, not 45.