Posted March 31, 200817 yr after all this time and thousands of pounds it has been declared that there was NO conspiracy behind the death of diana, princess of wales. mi5, duke of edinborough, charles... all vindicated... all this nonsense put about by al-fayed has been shown to be a load of cobblers! personally i think al-fayed should pick up the bill for this, and NOT the taxpayer.
March 31, 200817 yr There should never have been an inquest in the first place, waste of money Its long since time to move on Hopefully this will be the end of the matter and the Express will stfu too
April 1, 200817 yr Absolutely - now if the f***ing right wing media would stop selling papers off the back of unproven theories.
April 1, 200817 yr I dont particularly believe that it was anything other than what it was - a tragic accident.... BUT..... I also dont believe that there wasn't at some point some sort of plot to kill Diana.. She was an embarrassment to the British establishment (especially with the landmines thing which likely cost the UK arms dealers a hell of a lot in lost contracts, (these sorts of people dont take kindly to losing money, and they dont exactly play with kid gloves, they have all sorts of dodgy contacts all round the world..). The accident in Paris was just extremely fortuitous for certain people with certain interests if you ask me (in politics, in the arms trade, and yes, in the Royal Family too I reckon; dont pretend for a minute that they would shrink from killing "one of their own", wouldn't be the first time - Mary Queen of Scots, Anne Boleyn to name but two famous historical examples.....). Had they actually carried out the plot, it certainly would not have been a car crash, too many variables, too many things could go wrong.. A much easier way to do it would be to maybe make it look like suicide (a' la Dr David Kelly....), or perhaps administer an untraceable poison which gives an outward appearance of a heart attack.... Nope, the Paris accident was not an assassination in itself (no one would be so stupid as to plot an assassination in this manner), but don't kid yourselves that one wasn't on the cards had this unfortunate (or fortunate to some...) accident not occurred....
April 1, 200817 yr Author I dont particularly believe that it was anything other than what it was - a tragic accident.... BUT..... I also dont believe that there wasn't at some point some sort of plot to kill Diana.. She was an embarrassment to the British establishment (especially with the landmines thing which likely cost the UK arms dealers a hell of a lot in lost contracts, (these sorts of people dont take kindly to losing money, and they dont exactly play with kid gloves, they have all sorts of dodgy contacts all round the world..). The accident in Paris was just extremely fortuitous for certain people with certain interests if you ask me (in politics, in the arms trade, and yes, in the Royal Family too I reckon; dont pretend for a minute that they would shrink from killing "one of their own", wouldn't be the first time - Mary Queen of Scots, Anne Boleyn to name but two famous historical examples.....). Had they actually carried out the plot, it certainly would not have been a car crash, too many variables, too many things could go wrong.. A much easier way to do it would be to maybe make it look like suicide (a' la Dr David Kelly....), or perhaps administer an untraceable poison which gives an outward appearance of a heart attack.... Nope, the Paris accident was not an assassination in itself (no one would be so stupid as to plot an assassination in this manner), but don't kid yourselves that one wasn't on the cards had this unfortunate (or fortunate to some...) accident not occurred.... bollox. if there had been no accident then diana would still be here today. i dont swallow for one second the notion that there was any such plot to get rid...
April 1, 200817 yr bollox. if there had been no accident then diana would still be here today. i dont swallow for one second the notion that there was any such plot to get rid... Really...? Then you're living in cloud cuckoo land mate.... Name me one dignitary, politician or celeb that somebody, somewhere hasn't plotted to kill..... She had a lot more enemies than you or I will ever know (and probably more enemies than many politicians do..), many of them incredibly dangerous people with vested interests which she was directly interfering with (such as arms dealers).... These people dont forget. Or forgive.... They were just waiting for the right time, but hey, sh!t happened and they didn't have to get their hands dirty..... Although I do agree that Al Fayed should pay the legal costs... He's not exactly short of a few quid....
April 1, 200817 yr Is there any news other than the fact that she's still dead? :lol: :lol: Well, Paul Burrell's a big, fat, lying Cockmeister..... Oh, hang on, that aint exactly recent news either..... :lol: :lol:
April 1, 200817 yr Author Really...? Then you're living in cloud cuckoo land mate.... Name me one dignitary, politician or celeb that somebody, somewhere hasn't plotted to kill..... .... the queen prince william, harry, princess eugene, beatrice, anne..... blah blah blah.... is that enough? :lol:
April 1, 200817 yr I wonder how much this has cost us, the taxpayer :rolleyes: I agree that Al Fayed should foot the bill. All this money and it certainly won't bring any of them back to life.
April 7, 200817 yr Well what a surprise, the jury have put 2 + 2 together and come up with 4. It isn't a whitewash. The conspiracy theorists will never be happy because they cannot understand that sometimes the most logical reason for something happening is actually the truth. No "accident" is really an accident - there is always a reason, and in this case there were several: 1. Drunk chauffeur. 2. Chauffeur driving too fast. 3. Paparazzi chasing car, spooking chauffeur driving vehicle he was not used to driving on a known traffic accident hotspot. 4. Occupants not wearing seatbelts. If any one of these things had not happened, Diana and Dodi would probably still be alive, but the most "controllable" one is number 4, the wearing of seatbelts - if they'd been wearing them, they almost certainly would have survived, and probably not even that badly injured. Remember the nearest point of impact to the pillar was on the front passengers side where the bodyguard sat who was the only survivor, probably because he was the only one wearing a seatbelt. Not exactly rocket science, but a waste of £10 million of taxpayers money, and Al Fayed is still saying it was murder. Yet he dragged out this case for so long that he is no longer eligible to be sued for damages under British Law. Or is that just a conspiracy on my behalf. No doubt Al Fayed will blame the FA for conspiring against him when Fulham get relegated from the Premiership. :lol:
April 7, 200817 yr So really, it's nothing anyone knew about before. Give it another 5 years and they'll be atleast another couple of hundred new theorys anyway, so what's the point?
April 8, 200817 yr Author Well what a surprise, the jury have put 2 + 2 together and come up with 4. It isn't a whitewash. The conspiracy theorists will never be happy because they cannot understand that sometimes the most logical reason for something happening is actually the truth. No "accident" is really an accident - there is always a reason, and in this case there were several: 1. Drunk chauffeur. 2. Chauffeur driving too fast. 3. Paparazzi chasing car, spooking chauffeur driving vehicle he was not used to driving on a known traffic accident hotspot. 4. Occupants not wearing seatbelts. If any one of these things had not happened, Diana and Dodi would probably still be alive, but the most "controllable" one is number 4, the wearing of seatbelts - if they'd been wearing them, they almost certainly would have survived, and probably not even that badly injured. Remember the nearest point of impact to the pillar was on the front passengers side where the bodyguard sat who was the only survivor, probably because he was the only one wearing a seatbelt. Not exactly rocket science, but a waste of £10 million of taxpayers money, and Al Fayed is still saying it was murder. Yet he dragged out this case for so long that he is no longer eligible to be sued for damages under British Law. Or is that just a conspiracy on my behalf. No doubt Al Fayed will blame the FA for conspiring against him when Fulham get relegated from the Premiership. :lol: tbh i think this summs up the thread perfectly, i dont think theres anything else to add.
April 8, 200817 yr The conspiracy theorists will never be happy because they cannot understand that sometimes the most logical reason for something happening is actually the truth. They also don't mention one thing - on August 30th 1997, she and Dodi were meant to fly straight to London has her boys were starting the 97/98 school year that Tuesday (September 2nd). The trip to Paris was a spur of the moment thing, so they couldn't have planned for something that, as far as anyone knew, wasn't going to happen. As for the bill - al-Fayed should pay it. I think he can afford £12 million (I think that's how much it is). And then charged with perjury. Edited April 8, 200817 yr by DitzyNizzy
April 8, 200817 yr Author am i the only one fed up with al-fayad? in the box he said he would accept the verdict, now its out hes considering taking it further. he still insists that the royal family (a family of vampires) is behind their murders. isnt this treason?..... in a court of law after ten years theres not 1 shred of evidence that it was murder, and he still calls the royal family murderers. im not fan of the royal family, but this blokes getting on my wick . deport the cunt.
April 9, 200817 yr I dont particularly believe that it was anything other than what it was - a tragic accident.... BUT..... I also dont believe that there wasn't at some point some sort of plot to kill Diana.. She was an embarrassment to the British establishment (especially with the landmines thing which likely cost the UK arms dealers a hell of a lot in lost contracts, (these sorts of people dont take kindly to losing money, and they dont exactly play with kid gloves, they have all sorts of dodgy contacts all round the world..). The accident in Paris was just extremely fortuitous for certain people with certain interests if you ask me (in politics, in the arms trade, and yes, in the Royal Family too I reckon; dont pretend for a minute that they would shrink from killing "one of their own", wouldn't be the first time - Mary Queen of Scots, Anne Boleyn to name but two famous historical examples.....). Had they actually carried out the plot, it certainly would not have been a car crash, too many variables, too many things could go wrong.. A much easier way to do it would be to maybe make it look like suicide (a' la Dr David Kelly....), or perhaps administer an untraceable poison which gives an outward appearance of a heart attack.... Nope, the Paris accident was not an assassination in itself (no one would be so stupid as to plot an assassination in this manner), but don't kid yourselves that one wasn't on the cards had this unfortunate (or fortunate to some...) accident not occurred.... I'm sure I mentioned this to you before but I think you said I was mad or something.
April 10, 200817 yr .... the queen prince william, harry, princess eugene, beatrice, anne..... blah blah blah.... is that enough? :lol: I think there have been plots in the past to kill/abduct the Queen mate, dead wrong there... Erm, well, wasn't the whole "oh, we have to keep Harry's involvement in Afghanistan secret" thing all about staving off potential assassinations/murder plots???? Or did I miss that one....? Wasn't your whole argument "oh, the Govt had to keep his involvement quiet cos the Taliban would've tried to have a go at him...". Suggesting rather that there are almost certainly people out there who would try to kill either of the Royal Princes given half the chance. So, again, you're WRONG!!!! :P There was a conspiracy to kidnap Princess Anne in the 70s.... And a lot of abductions do end up turning into murder....
April 10, 200817 yr I'm sure I mentioned this to you before but I think you said I was mad or something. Did you...? I honestly dont remember to be honest... Was it not the case that you thought that the accident in Paris was an assassination...? :unsure: Like I say, I dont feel that it was.. But I almost certainly believe that there was somebody out there who was intending on doing harm to Diana (perhaps an assassin hired by UK arms industry or political interests..), but it aint the same thing as saying that the tragedy in Paris was an assassination in itself... There are far easier ways to make murder look like an accident than staging something as elaborate as a car crash where there are just way too many things that can go wrong.... Professional assassins account for ALL variables and would've staged something a lot more simple and low-key - such as a suicide.. Given her pretty fragile mental state, a 'suicide' wouldn't be such a difficult sell let's face it....
Create an account or sign in to comment