Another day in the world of redtop tabloid reporting and the press are still waffling on about Heather Mills McCartney's hardcore pwano pictures.

 

However should Heather Mills McCartney be left alone now by these tabloids? or is she fairgame as she went out with a Beetle?

 

and are all the redtops hypocrits for going on and on and on about these 'hardcore' pictures when most of the celeb gossip they go on and on about for most of the week are people known to get their boobs out in Nuts and Zoo.

Another day in the world of redtop tabloid reporting and the press are still waffling on about Heather Mills McCartney's hardcore pwano pictures.

 

However should Heather Mills McCartney be left alone now by these tabloids? or is she fairgame as she went out with a Beetle?

 

and are all the redtops hypocrits for going on and on and on about these 'hardcore' pictures when most of the celeb gossip they go on and on about for most of the week are people known to get their boobs out in Nuts and Zoo.

 

She has always craved publicity in her life so publicity is a 2 way street

 

At least stumpy will soon have £200+m to cushion the blow :rolleyes:

 

She has always craved publicity in her life so publicity is a 2 way street

 

At least stumpy will soon have £200+m to cushion the blow :rolleyes:

 

oh yeah forgot about the leg thing :lol:

i think we should leave alone the tabloids that do all this muck spreading..

 

i couldnt give a flying fcuk about her past, or future... she is just... nothing.

It's stories like this that make me HATE the British press.

 

What business is it of ANY of us whether she once took her clothes off or not?

It's stories like this that make me HATE the British press.

 

What business is it of ANY of us whether she once took her clothes off or not?

 

 

absolutely, however there are a large number of people who have nothing else better to think about, and get off on these sensationalist stories.... it still sucks though..

 

ps nice to see you on here more adam :)

She has still used the press for her own ends on many an occasion and if people crave publicity then they have to accept bad publicity too

 

I am not bothered if she stripped or took part in porno movies etc money is money but I suspect that the person behind this is Sir Paul himself and is discrediting her as much as he can to benefit him in the court case that will decide how the money is split

It's stories like this that make me HATE the British press.

 

What business is it of ANY of us whether she once took her clothes off or not?

Ditto.... i couldn't give a ****.... who else really does?

It's stories like this that make me HATE the British press.

 

What business is it of ANY of us whether she once took her clothes off or not?

 

and also the reports are not constant. in one part they say she posted for hardcore sex photos and further down they say she simulated sex with some porno guy. how can you simulate sex in a hardcore porno? thought the idea behind them were people were actually having sex?

 

think its just an excuse to keep running all the page 3 by saying it was worst than it was. Isnt Madonna supposed to have done a similar book?

Considering the likes of The Scum regularly feature scantily-clad ladies in their pathetic excuse for a newspaper purely to sell more copies, it's a bit bloody rich them coming across all 'moralistic' about what Heather Mills gets up to....

 

But....as the saying goes - "Live by the sword, die by the sword", Heather has actively courted publicity when it's suited her, it's a bit rich for her to cry foul now when it's not going all her own way....

 

But really, when you think about it, the ultimate fault lies with the "great British public" who lap up all this trivial bullsh!t like the sheep they are.... <_< If there wasn't a market for this sh!t, it wouldn't sell.....

True Scott

 

I still remember The Sun having a 10 day countdown to Sam Fox's 16th birthday so she could legally show her tits in the paper, yet The Sun seems to moralise about paedophilia, if that isn't hypocricy by them I dunno what is :rolleyes:

True Scott

 

I still remember The Sun having a 10 day countdown to Sam Fox's 16th birthday so she could legally show her tits in the paper, yet The Sun seems to moralise about paedophilia, if that isn't hypocricy by them I dunno what is :rolleyes:

 

think id rather have a picture of hmm rather than gary glitter near naked like in todays paper :puke2: :puke2:

True Scott

 

I still remember The Sun having a 10 day countdown to Sam Fox's 16th birthday so she could legally show her tits in the paper, yet The Sun seems to moralise about paedophilia, if that isn't hypocricy by them I dunno what is :rolleyes:

 

Seriously? Jesus, that is truly fukkin' vile..... Yeah, they're really ones to talk about 'family values', innit....? <_<

 

Seriously? Jesus, that is truly fukkin' vile..... Yeah, they're really ones to talk about 'family values', innit....? <_<

 

Sam Fox???!?!?!?!?

 

let me check the book

well if she had her first hit single in 1986 then no doubt its two different newspaper staffing. i doubt it would be the same people 20 years ago editing it as today. so probably they wouldnt do that thought of thing today as the current editiors campaigns are probably different.

 

there was a Mary-Kate and Ash Olson count down on line so things like that keep on going