Ahaha, it's like impossible to get mad @ you when you go on about pickle. ^_^ :heart:

 

Butttt, Peta wouldn't need to take drastic action if the other people didn't abuse animals! They obv have a reason and don't like what's being done.

And, Peta can't be as bad as murdering scientists. :o

 

I would so put an embarrassment smiley, but unlike the MSN one which looks WELL embarrassed, the one on here looks like a weird, flirty "OOH - SUITS YOU SIR" kind. Thereby I won't.

 

Buuuttttt, they still terrorise people which is -so- not on regardless of the situation =o. They don't have good enough reasons though. It's like in R.S how Pacifist's reasons as to why you shouldn't go to war -always- undermine those of the just war/no war/holy war causes. A bit.

 

Also, it's rather ironic that a considerable amount of PETA supporters have pets, or have/have known somebody who had a disease and was treated for it using modern medicine. PETA is firmly against this sort of thing, just shows how shockingly hypocritical they and their supporters are.

 

Again, nothing against animal welfare malarkey. JUST AGAINST REDICULOUSLY NAMED PETA!

 

PAGE 3 OF THE DEBATE.

 

 

WE ROXORRRRZ!

What good do whales do anyway? Just take up room in the sea. It's not our fault if they swim off track into the Thames is it. It's not as if you can have one as a pet either, why love them so much?

 

So the only animals you care about are dogs, cats, hamsters and rabbits ? ;) :unsure:

 

You can't keep Siberian tigers, elephants, orangutans, pandas etc as pets, using your analogy above about the whale does that mean you think that the animals I listed above that are all endangered species just take up useless space in the jungle so can all clear off and die ? :lol:

 

 

I would so put an embarrassment smiley, but unlike the MSN one which looks WELL embarrassed, the one on here looks like a weird, flirty "OOH - SUITS YOU SIR" kind. Thereby I won't.

 

Buuuttttt, they still terrorise people which is -so- not on regardless of the situation =o. They don't have good enough reasons though. It's like in R.S how Pacifist's reasons as to why you shouldn't go to war -always- undermine those of the just war/no war/holy war causes. A bit.

 

Also, it's rather ironic that a considerable amount of PETA supporters have pets, or have/have known somebody who had a disease and was treated for it using modern medicine. PETA is firmly against this sort of thing, just shows how shockingly hypocritical they and their supporters are.

 

Again, nothing against animal welfare malarkey. JUST AGAINST REDICULOUSLY NAMED PETA!

 

Ahahahaha I love the msn one. It's blates the only one we ever use as we constantly make typos. B)

DO YOU WANT IT SIR? DO YOU?. HAWHAW.

 

Are Peta really against giving medicine ??? :o

 

People like Alkaline Trio support Peta, and whole load of bands too like MCR.

 

I don't get the war bit. Explain.

So the only animals you care about are dogs, cats, hamsters and rabbits ? ;) :unsure:

 

You can't keep Siberian tigers, elephants, orangutans, pandas etc as pets, using your analogy above about the whale does that mean you think that the animals I listed above that are all endangered species just take up useless space in the jungle so can all clear off and die ? :lol:

 

Yeah coz I really said that didn't I? :mellow:

 

But why whales though? Elephants are way more important then whales, they get tortured into performing in circuses.

But whales and the like get all injured, as a result of OVER FISHING!! B) I'm on a roll with the technical terminology, ahah.

 

But yeah, they get trapped in nets. That was my point.

But whales and the like get all injured, as a result of OVER FISHING!! B) I'm on a roll with the technical terminology, ahah.

 

But yeah, they get trapped in nets. That was my point.

 

Yeah, it's not as if whales are getting experimented on is it?

Where as loads of other animals are.