I may as well put all my thoughts on this (ill informed and slightly less ill-informed) into one big infodump.
Firstly, regardless of who won, I was hoping that the result would be emphatic, with the winner clearing both the Electoral College & the popular vote with sizeable margins, which is what will happen once all the votes are counted, so there's that.
My predictions for this election (which I didn't commit to paper this time) were similar to back in 2016 - up until a few weeks ago I thought Trump would win, but then shifted to Kamala Harris with a few weeks to go after seeing the early votes in swing states going in her favour. Once again, never ask me to predict anything political, as I inevitably get it wrong.
I do not see election turning out the way because Trump won. The election turned out the way it did because the Democrats lost. When Joe Biden ran in 2020, it should have been clear from the outset that he would run for only one term, so that a proper primary process could be undertaken to find a popular successor within the party. When that didn't happen, the Democrats' chance of winning became slim given Biden's health (I refuse to believe that the Democrats didn't know there were issues with his health until his debate with Trump, I'm sure in the next few years there will be interesting insider books that come out setting out what the Biden White House was like from the inside, which will be rather juicy). Once he finally dropped out, they should have arranged an expediated emergency primary to get a candidate with popular approval within the party. Instead, they went with the vice president Kamala Harris, who proved so unpopular when she ran in 2020 that she withdrew early in the process, and would not likely have won the nomination had she taken part in a full primary. I have some sympathy for her given that she was only given a few months to prepare for running for president instead of a full year lead-in, but in hindsight she was never going to win on a "I'm not Donald Trump", even with the backing of Dick Cheney and Richard Spencer. As to the question of "she lost because she was black & a woman", lets not forget that Barack Obama did win two elections, so colour is not a barrier to the highest office. I've said before that when America does elect a woman as president, I believe that she will be a Republican rather than a Democrat, so the next Republican primary will be interesting.
As for those saying that the Democrats lost because [insert something that confirms my priors], I will say that the Democratic campaign that ran was more leftward than the average voter on social issues, and more rightward than the average American on economic issues. It's interesting to note that in ballot initiatives "conservative" deep red states Missouri & Alaska passed votes to increase the minimum wage, whilst bluer than a blue whale California voted 70% in favour of tougher punishments for theft & drug related crime. It's almost as if being economically left wing whilst being more (but not totally) socially conservative is a vote winner.*
I've seen it reported that one of the few demographics where the Democrats improved between now and 2020 was with voters who earn more than $100,000 per year. I understand the irony of the working classes voting for the party of billionaire Donald Trump and the richest man in the world Elon Musk, but the Democrats losing its working class support underpins the rightward shift of the working classes. It was once believed that demographics were destiny, and that the less white the US becomes, the less likely the Republicans would ever win again. Given nearly all demographics shifted to Trump (with the majority of Latinos voting for him, even with the "garbage" comments!), I think we can shatter that myth once and for all.
This election makes the UK somewhat an outlier in the Western world, with it being one of the few countries that hasn't shifted rightward in its recent elections (although that may have something to do with our jolly electoral system of first past the post, see also France). Hopefully Labour can learn a few lessons from it before 2029 to ensure that they don't become a single term government as well. I also don't envy them having to cosy up to Trump now especially given what they've said about him over the years (especially David Lammy, although he has said that he does have a good relationship with VP elect JD Vance, which I can somewhat understand given his Blue Labour leanings). Being in opposition really is politics on easy mode, but once you're in power everything changes.
As for Trump, there are two things that concern me more than anything else with him in a 2nd term. The first is on Ukraine, he has said that he wants the war with Russia to end as soon as possible. Now I'm all for peace and and end to war, but if a peace deal is struck early on in his term, then such a deal would see Ukraine waving goodbye to Crimea for good, and likely have to give up some of the mainland territory in Donbas that Putin has taken since 2022. And I don't trust Putin not to salami slice Europe even if a deal is brokered (Moldova could be next). I'm also pretty concerned if Robert Kennedy Jr is put in charge of health in any future Trump administration, his anti-vaccination stance could literally kill millions of children if he is allowed to enact even a fraction of it.
Finally, given how volatile politics are at the moment, I suspect that the Democrats will win back the White House in 2028. I'm not even going to attempt to predict who with just yet.
Thar be my two pence worth, whether you agree or not.
*Yes, I know I'm a hypocrite.