Bleedin Heck

We see it all the time, This artist breaks that 50 year or 40 year record etc... But are they really? We would be foolish to think record companies and/or artists are not paying streaming services to push certain songs. It is rather balant at Xmas time when you ask AI to play an Xmas song, but it is happening all the time. So what is more real to you, what record is real, the 300k or the 301k? We know that dedicated buyers would of existed way back then, going from chart listed stores buying Physical copies, but I feel it would not be as prolific as "Buying streaming time" now. What is more real, getting of your butt going to a brick and mortar and buying or "Alexa play..."? and should artists be credited with breaking records from the days of pure sales?

I find it funny that "Who" gets mentioned so often always alluding some kind of corruption going on. Go to any artist forum on this site and you will find "Urging" by other posters to stream this 10 times a day, stream that 10 times a day". Whats the difference between that and "Who"? Go to any artist group on any other site and you will find the same thing. Streaming is Payola all over again, in it's current format it is corrupt therefore making the the weekly charts corrupt. Don't ask me what the answer is, I have no idea, but it cant continue.

I am sorry, you are obviously right. I forgot no one in the UK has social Media and would of not seen the stories and video's of KL's half time show and TS being booed amongst 100's of other stories

120 Million watched the superbowl worldwide which her name was linked with even though it was in a negative manner. I think thats the reason the people who make the decisions decided to bring the delivery date fowrard. Amplfying the old adage any publicity is good publicity