Jump to content

No Sleeep

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by No Sleeep

  1. That boy (there’s been a few since so I see why it’s confusing) was 17 when their relationship began and Huw has given him over £35,000 (allegedly) over the past 3 years, according to the boy’s parents. It’s not that surprising he would deny it, a lot of people don’t realise they’ve been groomed until they’re much older. The money Huw gave him also apparently funded his drug addiction, so it’s a very sad story all round.
  2. And it’s impossible for me to take the family’s side without “falling” for The Sun’s trap? Your argument is incredibly condescending. You’ve decided I have no critical thought, any opinion I have on this is worthless to you, so this back and forth feels rather pointless :rolleyes: And I used Prince Andrew as an example due to the similarities - both older men rumoured to have inappropriate relations with 17 year olds. I don’t think it’s a wild comparison to make. It’s only now that I’m seeing a lot of people insisting he did nothing illegal due to the boy’s age that it strikes me as odd, especially when many who are quick to forgive and forget Huw’s misdeeds were the same ones who (rightfully) called out Prince Andrew
  3. Lock ‘er up :rolleyes:
  4. I wouldn’t mind Kylie ending up at #11 if it meant Madonna got another top 10 - sorry sorry sorry! Can’t believe Madonna blocking Kylie from the top 10 (and vice versa) is even a prospect in 2023 lol
  5. And you would know that how…? I could just as easily accuse some of you of the same bias against The Sun
  6. He’s a 60 year old man who clearly has a habit of messaging teenagers on Instagram for no apparent good reason - taking everything else out of it, that’s just not right to me.
  7. It’s obviously not all fabricated though is it? The Sun are just reporting what the boy’s family are claiming - he very well may have waited until he was 18 to pay for photos but the family are adamant their “relationship” began when he was 17. That technically wouldn’t be illegal in this country but what would you think of a 60 year old chatting up a 17 year old? It’s 2023, these things should absolutely be called out. I just feel horrible for the family, now they have to see people online defending this predator. It’s no different to Prince Andrew but the reactions are vastly different… it’s odd. And like everything else is slowly morphing into a left vs right issue, The Sun vs BBC, when that’s just not the issue here. Old men flirting with 17 year olds will always be wrong to me no matter who it is
  8. The Met Police and the BBC aren’t exactly corruption free either. They’ve hardly had enough time to conduct a full investigation have they? We’ll never know the full story, I don’t know why people are so quick to take the Met Police’s word as gospel all of a sudden?
  9. I’ve seen the messages of him sending love heart emojis to a boy who was still in school… that’s enough for me!
  10. A 60 year old sliding into a 17 year old’s DMs is about as n*ncy as it gets IMO. Ephebophilia is just as bad as pedophilia. This is the same police force that let Jimmy Savile get away with it for so long so forgive me for not having a great deal of confidence in their judgement.
  11. To be fair if they could stick to people their own age (or at least just not boys barely out of, or in some cases still in, school), they would be fine and there’d be no backlash or need to suspend them. Just a thought.
  12. Madonna fans have been absolutely useless in this song’s success! It has completely floundered on iTunes
  13. The man still flirted with 17 year olds on Instagram. That’s what grooming is. I don’t care if nothing technically “illegal” happened, this man is a n*nce in my opinion. No 60 year olds should be flirting with teenagers!
  14. I think I’ll wait and buy it in store, the old fashioned way. So excited for this.
  15. Madonna top 10 on Spotify! Hope she can make it there officially soon, would be incredible for her to add to her top 10 tally this late in the game
  16. No Sleeep posted a post in a topic in Madonna's Madonna
    At least we know she’s alive @1678124819274162176
  17. No Sleeep posted a post in a topic in Madonna's Madonna
    Radar Online isn’t really a reliable source. You’d think her team would have done something to stop that kind of speculation though, so the fact that they haven’t really worries me.
  18. No Sleeep posted a post in a topic in Madonna's Madonna
    I’m getting more nervous the more time goes by with absolute radio silence from her team. I’ve accepted the money I’ve lost on this tour but now I’m really worried the rumours about her condition being much worse than they’ve let on is true.
  19. Any Britney music news is good news frankly, just happy she isn’t 100% retired!
  20. It’s always the same users who have a problem with a woman’s success, it was the exact same thing when we were happy Kylie went top 10.
  21. Do we not have the full Spotify top 200?
  22. I find it odd that If You Were With Me Now made it as high as #4 after the complete (undeserved) floppage of Word Is Out, even odder since it seems to be totally forgotten by both Kylie fans and the gp
  23. Wow that’s good news! I had a bad feeling it would just miss out
  24. At least she’s charted at 3 different positions in the top 10 (#8, #9 & #10), 7 more to go! ;)
  25. Can’t see myself using this site much any more, so hard to use on a phone