ima

R1s "RECORD of the week", hey thats INCREDIBLE!! ... considering it DOESN'T even exist!!! :wacko: For those of us with more than half a working brain cell i trust by just glancing at the bottom of the following linked page thats BLATANTLY self evident. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/playlist/ Scott Mills is renown for being one of the most conceited SHALLOW two faced tw*ts around, he's often slagged Britney in the past for a cheap shot if he "thinks" it makes him look cool (ie the exact mong who would rave about (+buy) the iPhone when it was first released "cos its a 'cool' thing to do" then contradicts himself weeks later by when the reality of the swindle is exposed saying how bad they are and how stupid people were to buy them ie himself!) - you don't need to consider much to guess how ROTFLMAO his musical integrity is and you are using his utter lack of credibility to try to foist/"big up" Brit onto us :w00t: - who needs the media to put the last couple of nails in her career coffin with fans like you...BUT we are told till our ears bleed its.. "ALBUM of the MILLENIA" every critic (who doesn't lie + hate Britney) in the world says SO..it MUST BE TRUE any of our opposing peasant views are simply a RIDICULOUS joke (+ you thought music was the epitomy of subjectivity...WRONG!) .Freedom of speech and opinion aren't permissable if they are negative to Britney (UNLESS we are in the REAL world OUTSIDE a Britney forum which WE ARE!). Can't this offensive and beyond imbecilic Britney fanatiscism be restricted to its own forum if it continues to use this general board for the purposes of repeatedly spreading such ignorant/incompetant/deceitful/whatever reason misinformation all the time.(remember the clueless reporting of POM #5 (or something) airplay debut recently, the endless claims of her mental + physical health improvement turning out to be the usual desperate indenial wishful thinking , remember in the summer the "SHE'S ONLY LOST FULL CUSTODY HER KIDS FOR A FORNIGHT" she's STILL a good Mum with her unstable mental condition...fast forward months + MONTHS later.....MAJOR DUHHHH!! ) With such an unprecedented chart bombing album now well beyond the chance of significant resurection (do you know what the likelyness is for her having another Toxic appeal/size hit "so" soon again?) , for what should by now, given past consistent worldwide success, be an established performer, its clear the degree to which the general public aren't interested/take seriously Brits music now (eventually she'll loose the only interest she has left, her use as media lite gossip with her train wreck existance as it becomes repetative + overfamiliar - will she survive her most valued reason for existance without all that attention to seek?) - all the mass of kids who originally were victims of the initial slick Record PR campaign have long since left this compromised, ruptured sinking vessel in their droves, the insane still DESPERATELY clinging on board will drown long before they see the reality the majority see, believing still that their beloved ship is as sound and seaworthy as ever, while everyone else clearly sees a shocking barely recognisable WRECK ( even with LMAO comedically blatant, even more disfigured looking, digital enhancement ) doomed to spend the rest of its life in an opposite manner to its previous existence at the BOTTOM of the sea . http://s4.rimg.info/0aef235a25d554466b1e97f04e2a40aa.gif Is this thread not spookilly reminiscient to all those higly embarrasing Kelly C ones last year that were full of chart ignorant DELUSIONAL OTT predictions based exclusively on anything but FACTS no matter that their initial grandiose claims could not have been more wrong they still pompously claimed ridiculous sales for the album despite the steadily mounting negative evidence/ suggestions - that the album turned out to be one of the most spectacular flops considering the size of the album it was following up could not have been better justice and finally silenced such obssessional insanity and we've enjoyed a COMPLETE absense of her from the chart and her fanatics rantings in our faces when we log onto public boards ever since...aaaahhh WHAT RELIEF :D

Yet ANOTHER CLASSIC to SHARE around the web, http://s.rimg.info/d8efba4dd1fd1e9a57a6a7b23c9cd054.gif knew you'd fall for this one - thanks guys!

:wacko: Goading by emotionallly blackmailing people to break the law...REALLY! *tut**tut* WHAT astuteness - you've given Xtinas fans hope it won't FLOP on a release then! http://s.rimg.info/965bab1c6434a305f7dfa60086ae1be4.gifhttp://s.rimg.info/965bab1c6434a305f7dfa60086ae1be4.gifhttp://s.rimg.info/965bab1c6434a305f7dfa60086ae1be4.gif Well thankyou guys for (unintentionally) giving members of forums all over the net a fantastic "ROTFLPMP" via a link to this thread. + you wonder why Britney is never taken seriously by anyone(sane). "Fanaticism consists of redoubling your effort when you have forgotten your aim " ....you couldn't have demonstrated the embarrassment of delluded fanatiscism with greater clarity here. What you idolize isn't the Britney of today but just a figment of your imagination labeled Britney that protects you from the harsh reality you can't face up to.To the medical world your endlessly repeated crushed hopes for her "recovery" (ie the recovery you assume from medical ignorance) comes as no surprise, there is still no 'cure' from such chronic illnesses (addiction comorbid depression) just like her grandmother was never back to her 'old self' after her kids birth, especially since Britney refuses the only psychological help that can at least give her the best chance to stabilize + manage her condition LONG TERM. Anyway you clearly don't let the (scientific) facts or the truth bother your thoughts in the slighest, so carry on chaps.......

TALK ABOUT UNFAIR critiscism, you make out the original was some kind of hit(when it never charted) therefore little talent in such a sure fire, ready made hit when nothing could be further from the truth - basically it was equivalent to ANY DEMO the general public haven't heard before that a popstar would record (eg EXACTLY the same situation as CGYOOMH which was initially offered to Sophie EB whose team rejected it - bet you weren't hurling the same UNORIGINAL accusation at Kylie when she released that :nocheer: ). ....and for any more IGNORAMUSES out there ; Kish Mauve is basically a front name for producer/songwriter Jim Eliot’s work, Kylie's team enquired if he had any material for a new Kylie album and he sent them 2 Hearts. Both Kylie AND Parlo etc were VERY keen to record it and Jim Eliot worked with Kylie on his track to produce (vocals + instrumentation) the version thats now in the public domain - ie exactly the same proccess that happened with the original demo of CGYOOMH (with Rob Davis + Cathy Dennis being the producers,writers and Cathy(an ex pop star and old peer of Kylie) also doing the demo vocals) - OBVIOUSLY the demo would sound similar to the released version if it was produced by the same team who didn't want the hit potential of the original diluted.. :manson:

THANK FCUK FOR THAT!!!! It potential for pain inducement is such that morally it shouldn't even be released anywhere for public consumption - especially since Radio has already protected our health by refusing to pick it up all over the country. Such motivation is expected since no-one in their right mind would actually (be in a hurry or buy it )to listen to the thing(thus this allows for the exception of SG fanatics ;) )

Even if that wasn't just your personal opinion, considered the talent needed by Kylie to still be having mass appeal 20 years into her career ( and none of her peers from the late 80's have comparible success or are even still around) means even if Dannii has less than sis she probably still could have far more than your average pop star has :)

SO WHAT! Its their problem of music prejudice at the worst - AT LEAST you bought Dannii's music for the sake of the music ( to some extent at least) as opposed to eg the majority of Westlife fans (which is bought for other 'reasons' ie.Nicky's soooo fiiiitttttt!!!!! (etc etc)) . At the end of the day music is entirely a subjective experience if you sincerely enjoy the music you bought there is no moral ground that allows you to be treated any differently to another music buyer - not that that stops people from doing it but does it really have any effect on you what these nobodies(to you) think(wrongly) ? I've observered the most serious hardcore Dannii fans are usually very young gay men so it might have been looks of the unexpected/surprise that you got rather than any predjudice?