Jump to content

Sugababes ● General Discussion

Aidan
in Sugababes

Featured Replies

Surely they can't be called that? Even Sugarbabes would be better
  • Replies 1.3k
  • Views 144.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

At least if the line-up changes they can't keep the name :lol:

 

Which I think is the point.

 

You can replace a "Sugababe", but you can't replace a "Siobhan" or a "Keisha" or a "Mutya".

Sacred Three would have been a MUCH better name.

 

 

As for the individual company names. They are pretty cool (and an excellent tax loophole! - They have excellent accountants)

I like how it's glaringly obvious who has which company.
I like how it's glaringly obvious who has which company.

Not really. I would have said God Made Me Funky was Keisha at first rather than Mutya.

Oh dear. If this is true, I really hope the name gets shortened to MKS. Surely they just wouldn't go with Mutya Keisha Siobhan as a group name?!
This choice DOES seem pretty ridiculous. It's uninspired, unimaginative, boring, a mouthful... just BAD.

I think it's the best option after 'Sugababes'. They focus the attention on themselves, breaking the thought of 'there've been so many replacements I don't know who they are anymore'.

 

As tommie has pointed out, you can replace a 'Sugababe', but not a 'Siobhan'. It draws perfectly the difference between them and the group.

 

So yeah, I think it's pretty smart on their behalf not to use any band name.

Modified the cover to One Touch:

http://i47.tinypic.com/2luurm.jpg

 

<3

Go to topic listing

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.