July 25, 200618 yr LOL I am not, I just think that single teenage working class parents are being singled out in this thread so I am making the point that the offspring of working class teenage girls are not solely responsible for what is happening in this country today, there are bad parents right across the social divide so just because a wealthy daddy can afford to take the family to the Seychelles each year does not mean his kids are not annoying little $h!ts who are every bit as bad if not worse than chavs off a council tower block I just think that there is too much teenage single mum bashing in this thread as opposed to of ALL bad parents Example - A case recently over here where some windows were smashed in a shopping arcade, who was found guilty of criminal damage ? 2 chavs in hoodies ? nope 2 17 year olds from public school who's parents both work in the city in banking and live in a £750,000 house (I know the road well) why is she not being steralised and just the single mum off the council estate ?? I just think that teenage single mums are a convenient scapegoat when there are parents as bad if not worse higher up the social scale Yeah, that's certainly true, there probably is way too much focus on delinquents from Working Class backgrounds where the problem of delinquent youth amongst the so-called "better off" parents tends to be ignored (including certain little b/astards of Royal or aristocratic blood who snort coke, cheat in their exams, get drunk and disorderly, dress up as Nazis, etc and no bugger says sh!t about it...). But you can blame the Tabloid media for that more than anyone really....
July 25, 200618 yr I don't get why underage parents are such a problem if they love their child and dont abuse them, I was in town today and saw parents shouting and hitting their kids, and see that sort of thing everyday going past my house. They are always late twenties or older.
July 25, 200618 yr underage parents are a massive problem because a) they haven't ever worked - how can they support a child without state benefits or a job? B) it makes them unemployable
July 25, 200618 yr underage parents are a massive problem because a) they haven't ever worked - how can they support a child without state benefits or a job? B) it makes them unemployable What about if they have a job though? Or parents that can help out with money?
July 25, 200618 yr if someone's fit to work... there's no reason for anyone at all to be claiming benefits. Many of these young layabouts get pregnant dfeliberately to avoid ever having to work. And a 16 year old simply wouldn't have a job that would allow her to take a year off to have and bring up a baby.
July 25, 200618 yr Having low or no income does not make someone a bad mother, if I was a kid growing up I would far more prefer to be bought up by a poverty stricken mum that is going to give me loving care and attention than a wealthy career woman who is going to palm me off to child minders every day and never spend any time with me
July 25, 200618 yr totally agree, Ozzy. But genuine money struggles and social scrounging are two entirely different matters.
July 28, 200618 yr Since when that is "banning" drug addicts to have children? Is just giving them benefits not to have children. Don´t be so dramatic.
May 13, 200817 yr It's not a private matter when you have all these bloody chavvy Vikki-Pollard types (of both genders I might add...) going around and having sprogs by about a half a dozen different partners and expecting the taxpayer to pick up the tab for it... Fukk that! Sterilise and castrate these fukkers.... <_< Sorry, it's about time we got medieval on these leeching b/astards.... And I'm in agreement with Russ, about time to start with mandatory abortions, too many people in the world as it is..... As Bill Hicks once said "Hey, let's talk about this whole 'food/air' deal for a minute..." Bought up to the top for Scott and Jake ;) What is the difference between this comment and my call for the sterilisation of Palestinians, a terrorist state run by Hamas a terrorist organisation committed to the destruction of a country close to my heart I would welcome your comments Scott and Jake :) Why am I a fascist and a neo con when I suggest the same action against terrorists who want to destruct the nation of my "race" yet it is ok to suggest the same against chavs Mandatory abortions too, hmmmm sounds like something Hitler would advocate People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones Edited May 13, 200817 yr by Tim Barnes
May 13, 200817 yr Bought up to the top for Scott and Jake ;) What is the difference between this comment and my call for the sterilisation of Palestinians, a terrorist state run by Hamas a terrorist organisation committed to the destruction of a country close to my heart I would welcome your comments Scott and Jake :) Why am I a fascist and a neo con when I suggest the same action against terrorists who want to destruct the nation of my "race" yet it is ok to suggest the same against chavs Mandatory abortions too, hmmmm sounds like something Hitler would advocate People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones You know, that's just a really pathetic attempt by you to deflect responsibility from what you said... I have NEVER advocated targeting sterilization and abortions against a particular race or culture (and Chavs are NOT an Ethnic Group so dont even TRY to suggest they are....). You were advocating the Ethnic Cleansing of an entire race of people simply because they are fighting against oppression, it's rather different to my suggestion of general population control within UK society... People who cant afford kids shouldn't have them.. Rather different from your "let's exterminate all Palestinians because they wont lie down and take it" argument.... The country you love so much is based upon the oppression, colonisation, displacement and subjugation of an entire culture of people... If that is what's "close to your heart", then that says everything about you..... The Jews could have found someplace uninhabited to establish their state.... In fact, when Zionism was first founded, it was based upon doing exactly that, initially there was no suggestion of going to Palestine, that came later when the religious nutters gained control.....
Create an account or sign in to comment