Demonstrations' to be banned during Olympics'

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/polit...cs-6265121.html

Ministers ponder tough new powers to prevent Occupy-style protests interfering with Games

 

Ministers are planning legal action to restrict public protests during the Olympics, amid fears that Britain could be disrupted by lengthy and high-profile demonstrations.

 

The Home Office is so concerned about the impact of the stalemate over the Occupy London (OLSX) encampment outside St Paul's Cathedral that officials have been ordered to produce plans for avoiding a similar conflict during the Games next summer.

 

Ministers' plans, based on the measures put in place to remove long-term protesters from outside Parliament, includes identifying "exclusion zones" around key locations, and fast-tracking the removal of protests that do not have the blessing of the authorities. It would permit police to move in and disperse encampments quickly, in line with last week's clearance of the Occupy Wall Street camp in New York.

 

Protesters and legal experts condemned the moves as an assault on the right to peaceful protest. An OLSX spokeswoman, Naomi Colvin, said: "If the Government wants to do something that will restrict the right of peaceful protest, it will be in serious trouble. The coalition appears to be abandoning any attempt to behave like a democratic government."

 

Police have been given enhanced powers to act against protests at the Olympics since the Games were awarded to London six years ago, including the right to enter private homes and seize political posters. However, the St Paul's protest and the difficulties resolving the ensuing row raised further concerns about potential threats to the Games.

A senior Home Office source said the department had drawn up a series of proposals, largely based on the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011, that pave the way for the removal of protests and encampments in Parliament Square. The responsibility for taking legal action against protests and encampments would be transferred from landowners to public authorities.

 

"The threat from protests was always a danger during planning for the Olympics, but the St Paul's protest has shoved it up the agenda," the source said. "It is not just embarrassing, it can be a threat to security."

 

Colin Hay, professor of political analysis at Sheffield University, said the measures were in line with often controversial pre-Olympic preparations seen elsewhere. He added: "There is nothing better designed to prompt a wave of peaceful protest than the prospect of legislation designed to limit the opportunities for such protest."

Dame Vivienne Westwood yesterday rallied the anti-capitalist protesters outside St Paul's with a demand for young people to step off the "consumer treadmill" and "get a life". In a speech at the encampment, the fashion designer said: "You have to have culture to get a life. You have to have perspective to have [a reasoned] opinion."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Seriously..? Are we living in f**king China now...??

 

Just wait and see if this legislation wont be used to curb strike action and Republican demos against the celebrations of the Jubilee....

 

In fact, who's to say that it will even end when the Olympics does... This is a dangerous precedent, and I cant but help think of the words of John F Kennedy....

 

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, will make violent revolution inevitable..."

 

So, if it does all kick off next year, the Government has absolutely no one to blame but themselves...

 

I think I might protest against them banning protesting.

I think I might protest against them banning protesting.

 

:lol: :lol:

 

I was hoping someone would say that.... :)

 

"The responsibility for taking legal action against protests and encampments would be transferred from landowners to public authorities."

 

As this government has run down public authorities to barely skeleton staff I doubt any action will be taken so no need to worry! :)

"The responsibility for taking legal action against protests and encampments would be transferred from landowners to public authorities."

 

As this government has run down public authorities to barely skeleton staff I doubt any action will be taken so no need to worry! :)

 

Nahh, they'd likely prioritise "doing something" about protesters instead of actually doing something useful for the citizens of the country.... -_-

This is absolutely the right decision. I'm not a supporter of the Olympics being here but what does it look like to foreign athletes and TV & radio crews to see protesters? We need to portray a peaceful and non-controversial games and any protesters should be immediately arrested and held until after the games have ended. They've every week of every other year to have their futile protests which tbh get nowhere.

Edited November 20, 201113 yr by Common Sense

This is absolutely the right decision. I'm not a supporter of the Olympics being here but what does it look like to foreign athletes and TV & radio crews to see protesters? We need to portray a peaceful and non-controversial games and any protesters should be immediately arrested and held until after the games have ended. They've every week of every other year to have their futile protests which tbh get nowhere.

Why should the right to protest be suspended just because people are actually watching? :manson:

Why should the right to protest be suspended just because people are actually watching? :manson:

 

 

I just think it should. That's my opinion and it seems the Government's too. If you disagree then that's fine and I respect your view in a Democracy. Pity Grimley doesn't respect anyone else's views but his. :rolleyes:

Edited November 20, 201113 yr by Common Sense

I suspect the IOC insist on a ban on protests near the Olympic stadium. However that is no reason to ban protests elsewhere in London.

This is absolutely the right decision. I'm not a supporter of the Olympics being here but what does it look like to foreign athletes and TV & radio crews to see protesters? We need to portray a peaceful and non-controversial games and any protesters should be immediately arrested and held until after the games have ended. They've every week of every other year to have their futile protests which tbh get nowhere.

 

You mean like they did in China when protesters and journalists who were covering the protests were beaten up by the State Police...? Yeah, great one Chris... You tool.... :rolleyes:

 

I suspect the IOC insist on a ban on protests near the Olympic stadium. However that is no reason to ban protests elsewhere in London.

 

Precisely... People like Chris are sheep, they'll believe anything the govt will tell them.. Whereas those of us with an ounce of sense have learned to be suspicious of everything governments say...

 

Too bad if tourists find protest "inconvienient"... The Olympics are no excuse for suspending our democratic or sovereign rights....