Posted October 10, 200618 yr Which acts who have had at least one #1 hit single don't deserve to have any. My thinks Westlife McFly Busted Beyonce Destiny's Child Chico Shayne Ward Will Young Edited October 11, 200618 yr by Euro Music
October 10, 200618 yr Like we need to add anymore other than McFly :puke: :puke: and Westlife!!?? Though, i think som eof the Beatles stuff was quite overrated and didnt deserve number one (senses controversy, oops!!!!)
October 10, 200618 yr Which acts who have had at least one #1 hit single don't deserve to have any. My thinks Westlife McFly Busted Beyonce Destiny's Child I'd agree with the first 3, but poor Beyonce, you just don't like her do you ;) I'm still surprised that Westlife managed more than a handful of #1s let alone still continue to have them. My Dotmusic 2001 prediction that they would be splitting up sooner rather than later just never did come true...
October 10, 200618 yr I thought Elvis presely was WAY overrated. I suppose he was a breath of fresh air to the rather stale charts of the mid-50s, but I agree about him being overrated. He rarely wrote songs and beyond his "prime" years of the mid to late 50s and a brief spell in the very early 70s he was just another singer.
October 10, 200618 yr Westlife, Busted, McFly, and all these stupid boy bands who have #1´s lie 1-5-17-48-out.
October 10, 200618 yr I thought Elvis presely was WAY overrated. Well we have ANY of the #1 singles we have without him though. ;)
October 10, 200618 yr Westlife?? They don't seserve at least one no.1? Ok they may not deserve 13 but they deserve 6-7 No.1's
October 10, 200618 yr Shayne Ward - and any Pop Idol / X Factor 'winner' bar Will Young Wetlife any novelty record
October 10, 200618 yr there's nothing wrong with an act having one or two #1s (even the Crazy Frog's of this world!), it's the way acts began to have #1 after #1. At one time getting to #1 was a major achievement, in the late 90s and the early 00s it became a marketing exercise.
Create an account or sign in to comment