Jump to content

Featured Replies

The storyline news is getting a very bad online reaction.

If the storyline is true i totally agree but it may not be straight forward as it involves Jim who is a character i wish would wait away.

Edited by pippa

  • Replies 1k
  • Views 68.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Author
Apart from Jenny, the Connor’s are f***ing vile :mellow: Johnny has gone down in my estimations so much.
Apart from Jenny, the Connor’s are f***ing vile :mellow: Johnny has gone down in my estimations so much.

 

Agreed. Get rid of the f***ing lot of 'em (outside of Carla who I'll always love tbh)

Also agreed and i include Carla.

Jenny is brilliant although she needs to move away from the Conors.

I'd get rid only of Johnny really, Kate is kinda awful but I think there's stuff to explore with her and Rana at least for example, there's some mileage. Michelle is fine when she's outside of that unit with Robert, much better than she has been. Johnny is just awful recently, of course he has the worst thing imaginable for a parent happen but the way he is treating people because of it is disgusting, especially Jenny. She has done absolutely nothing wrong, I don't know why the writers are using this aftermath to portray him as unsympathetically as possible, being so vile to her and Eva particularly and then the Liz saga. It's just quite dull now that everyone he's on screen he's gonna be spitting vitriol at Eva, looking miserable and snapping at Jenny or lusting after Liz.

 

Carla is ofc iconic, she has more than enough to do without her family too, like if we keep Michelle there's still that close friendship, and there's always stuff with Peter, the factory saga with Alya... She can easily stand on her own two feet without needing her family to give her reasons to have anything to do.

LMAOOOO f*** OFF NAH :rofl: oh my lord is Kate Oates trying to bury the show christ
LMAOOOO I just went to look, ffs I was gonna say :rofl:
It's awful that I actually kind of believed it lmao

Valid points.

They should bring back Andy and build a storyline around him and not touch such a significant moment for Liz's history with the show.

Agree with everything there!

 

If they really wanted Jim to come back with a big storyline or someone else to bounce off, he could've had a secret child before Liz or something, I know that wouldn't affect Liz as much as Katie being alive but this is just totally jumping the shark. As said it was a huge moment in Liz's time on the street, definitive to her character, and they've erased it just because they are so desperate for Jim to come back, so they are. I know if soaps were exactly like real life it would be boring, and I suppose these hospital mix-ups do happen rarely but for it to be on the same street as where another woman who had it happen is ridiculous, plus how does a hospital f*** up SO badly that they think a dead baby is someone else's :/

Thank god Kayla is gone :drama:
  • Author
Agree with everything there!

 

If they really wanted Jim to come back with a big storyline or someone else to bounce off, he could've had a secret child before Liz or something, I know that wouldn't affect Liz as much as Katie being alive but this is just totally jumping the shark. As said it was a huge moment in Liz's time on the street, definitive to her character, and they've erased it just because they are so desperate for Jim to come back, so they are. I know if soaps were exactly like real life it would be boring, and I suppose these hospital mix-ups do happen rarely but for it to be on the same street as where another woman who had it happen is ridiculous, plus how does a hospital f*** up SO badly that they think a dead baby is someone else's :/

The funny thing is that Michele’s sons were born two weeks after Katie so that’s two baby swaps in one month :’)

The funny thing is that Michele’s sons were born two weeks after Katie so that’s two baby swaps in one month :’)

Omg I didn't even think it would be at the same hospital (obv they weren't born on screen and I assumed the Connors moved to Weatherfield) but I just looked it up, oh my god :lol: The odds of it happening are so rare so its terrible continuity and really jumping the shark to

 

Why is there a 25 year old woman with a 24 year old daughter on this??

Sarah and Bethany I assume you mean have a 13 year age gap, Sarah had Bethany when she was 13, but the problem is that Tina O'Brien has barely aged so still looks in her early 20s rather than 31 as she's meant to be and Lucy Fallon looks a bit older than 18 :lol:

  • Author
Omg I didn't even think it would be at the same hospital (obv they weren't born on screen and I assumed the Connors moved to Weatherfield) but I just looked it up, oh my god :lol: The odds of it happening are so rare so its terrible continuity and really jumping the shark to

I’m all for different opinions but it’s one of those storylines where I genuinely can’t see how anyone can defend it :lol: I’ve seen a few scenes of Liz’s baby dying at the time and they were incredibly important and marked a big change for the character. I don’t think Kate Oates has done bad at Corrie but she has very little respect for the show’s history imo

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.