@1769851930442878978

 

Can't believe the hype is this high with over 6 months to go! :cheeseblock:

@1771286797911294393

 

We are hyped

@1774524981256319391

 

OMG HYPE

Ahhhhhhhhh it's confirmed

 

View this post on Instagram

@1775197619951743093

 

:cheeseblock:

Ahhhhhhhhh it's confirmed

 

View this post on Instagram

I CANT BREATH!! :w00t:

 

NOT LONG AT ALL NOW OMG :w00t: :w00t:

Joker: Folie à Deux, featuring Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga, has been given an R rating due to:

 

- Occasional instances of strong violence

- Frequent use of explicit language

- Depictions of sexuality

- Brief scenes of full nudity

 

2 million likes for the poster on IG, a smash

 

The greatest living celebrity? Facts!!

 

https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/can-l...ga-save-joker-2

@1779461256363278747

 

:o :D

 

The greatest living celebrity? Facts!!

 

https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/can-l...ga-save-joker-2

 

 

What a stupid headline, nothing needs 'saving' the first Joker was one of the biggest and most critically acclaimed films of it's year with Joaquin Phoenix getting all the awards for best actor. Same for A Star is Born it has Bradley Cooper one of the biggest actors in it and the two previous versions of it were also big hits. :blink:

What a stupid headline, nothing needs 'saving' the first Joker was one of the biggest and most critically acclaimed films of it's year with Joaquin Phoenix getting all the awards for best actor. Same for A Star is Born it has Bradley Cooper one of the biggest actors in it and the two previous versions of it were also big hits. :blink:

I don't think you're referring to the same Joker movie we know. :unsure: The first film was far from being "one of the most acclaimed of its year" lol. It got mixed reviews on Metacritic with a 59 score.

 

https://www.metacritic.com/movie/joker/

 

Also, Gaga's version of A Star Is Born was the only one to combine critical acclaim with box office success, all the other 3 versions only achieved one of these requirements.

Whilst I don't think Joker 2 needs "saving" per se, Gaga can obviously help it to be seen as evolved version of the first one and make it potentially a bigger success too than it would be without her.

30 million views in just 6 days! :cheeseblock:

 

@1793867340012204136

 

 

@1796179992461602946

 

2024 is hers

Venice is the best option - and Italy wants to see her again.

@1800999499894055106

 

Based on trailer only, SLAY

New trailer was debuted to the industry professionals at CineEurope - no word yet when it will be released for the public. The story: https://variety.com/2024/film/global/warner...-17-1236040934/

 

 

I don't think you're referring to the same Joker movie we know. :unsure: The first film was far from being "one of the most acclaimed of its year" lol. It got mixed reviews on Metacritic with a 59 score.

 

https://www.metacritic.com/movie/joker/

 

Also, Gaga's version of A Star Is Born was the only one to combine critical acclaim with box office success, all the other 3 versions only achieved one of these requirements.

 

 

Lol talk about being selective. It swooped he awards season with Joaquin winning pretty much every one. It also got 69 on rotten tomato which is a good result for that site, anything over 60 is considered green. Not to mention it was very successful at the box office. The film was going to be a big deal whether Gaga was in it or not, she hasn’t saved anything.

 

That’s not taking away from the fact her name is helping the film, but it’s a mutual thing the film is helping her name too.