Posted August 10, 200717 yr what do people think i weren't sure at first but it has definently grown on me ok he don't have a good voice but the song is just great. :)
August 10, 200717 yr Quite like it, can understand why people think it's dull though :( Top 5 I reckon, his album will go exactly the same way as the Scissor Sisters - there's no chance in hell he'll have a top 20 hit after 1973 unless it's a really good song, deffo an album artist.
August 10, 200717 yr Shockingly bland, even by his standards. I just cannot believe he feels this is acceptable as his big comback single. Even the lyrics are awful. :wacko:
August 10, 200717 yr I really do find it very bland and feel that to be honest, he can only do Ballads and this I think is what he classes as an up-tempo song.
August 10, 200717 yr I hate the guy, can't see why he's so liked and what the fuss about some of his tracks was. But i'll admit to liking this track. :(
August 10, 200717 yr He doesn't interest me much, it's a pleasant enough song but am I alone in thinking it's a very weak song musically and lyrically? :unsure:
August 10, 200717 yr He doesn't interest me much, it's a pleasant enough song but am I alone in thinking it's a very weak song musically and lyrically? :unsure: No your not. I remember someone posted the lyrics in another thread ages ago (I think it was you?) and I remember thinking what weak lyrics they were, have now heard the song alot on the radio and feel it is in no way strong enough to be a single, never mind a big comeback one.
August 10, 200717 yr I haven't heard yet Neither have I and I pray that it stays that way. James Blunt is everything that's wrong with music today. Barely talented and simply 'marketable'. Buying a James Blunt release proves you don't give a $h!t what you listen to.
August 10, 200717 yr Neither have I and I pray that it stays that way. James Blunt is everything that's wrong with music today. Barely talented and simply 'marketable'. Buying a James Blunt release proves you don't give a $h!t what you listen to. worse still are 'blunt wannabes'... theres hundereds of solo males warbling away on tv, adverts,... who are they? WHO ARE THEY? too true though, very bad for pop music.
August 11, 200717 yr Just watched the vid on TV, and it ain't that good either. Found it on youtube. hHA4B9LcC20
August 11, 200717 yr I really love it :wub: and this is from a guy who wants to shoot James Blunt lol
August 11, 200717 yr Songs with years in the titles Smashing Pumpkins - 1979 Prince - 1999 Titiyo - 1989 Bowling For Soup - 1985 Busted - Year 3000 Alvin Stardust - In the year 2525 Silverchair - Anthem for the year 2000 Liked the song, btw
August 11, 200717 yr Well it is not as awful as I expected. But I'll ask this, if it is rubbish then how come it is the 2nd most requested song/video on MTV Hits (behind Sean Kingston - Beautiful Girls) ahead of 3rd Kanye West - Stronger & 4th Robyn - With Every Heartbeat. Whilst on I-Tunes it's video is currently the 2nd behind Sean Kingston & ahead of 3rd Kanye West. In short the omens are for a certain Top 3 Hit single.
August 11, 200717 yr Songs with years in the titles Smashing Pumpkins - 1979 Prince - 1999 Titiyo - 1989 Bowling For Soup - 1985 Busted - Year 3000 *Alvin Stardust - In the year 2525* Silverchair - Anthem for the year 2000 Liked the song, btw In The Year 2525 was by Zager and Evans.
August 11, 200717 yr Well it is not as awful as I expected. But I'll ask this, if it is rubbish then how come it is the 2nd most requested song/video on MTV Hits (behind Sean Kingston - Beautiful Girls) ahead of 3rd Kanye West - Stronger & 4th Robyn - With Every Heartbeat. Whilst on I-Tunes it's video is currently the 2nd behind Sean Kingston & ahead of 3rd Kanye West. In short the omens are for a certain Top 3 Hit single. Because all it needs is 10% of the people that bought Back To Bedlam to like it. The other 90% could think it's $h!te and it would still have 300,000 fans.
Create an account or sign in to comment