This week, on national television, we witnessed Heather Mills undergo a very public and very painful divorce ... from reality.

 

In the process, she lost the last few shreds of sympathy that people might still have held for her.

 

Here was Heather Mills, fantasist.

 

If her intention was to show the public the real woman behind the headlines then she succeeded in a quite unintentional way.

 

No one who watched her can now be in any doubt about the extent of her self-delusion.

 

Do you feel any sympathy towards this woman? Or has she shot herself in the foot.

 

See article here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1770

 

I lost any respect I had for stumpy when she falsely accused Macca of beating her, despicable behaviour blackening his name like that when dozens of Macca employes have said it never once happened so she deserves the stick she gets

 

The golddigging skank will get her payout then move onto the next victim

I lost any respect I had for stumpy when she falsely accused Macca of beating her, despicable behaviour blackening his name like that when dozens of Macca employes have said it never once happened so she deserves the stick she gets

 

The golddigging skank will get her payout then move onto the next victim

One does not know if the accusation is false or true.

 

It seems for sure that she is not getting unbiased journalism on the issue, which is a sad state of the press and a poor reflection on the nation.

Edited November 4, 200717 yr by e-motion

I think she has a point when she says that all she's done for 20 years is charity, then everyone hates her because shed performed this blasphemy against the untouchable godly Sir Paul! If it was anyone else in the world, no-one would give a chuff.

One does not know if the accusation is false or true.

 

It seems for sure that she is not getting unbiased journalism on the issue, which is a sad state of the press and a poor reflection on the nation.

 

I have to strongly disagree.

 

Going on the evidence available it is not unreasonable to assume that Heather has made false allegations.

 

In the last 45 years in the media, Paul has had countless kiss and tell stories, including three false accusations of being the father of some groupie/fan from his Beatles days.

 

There has been numerous ex-employees of his (either from Wings or more personal/business based) who have frequently sold their stories to the newspapers that Macca is stingy with his money & a control freak. (For example I've recently read record producer Tony Visconti's autobiography, and he made it pretty clear that he does not like Paul. Not least because of Paul's apparent head strong attitude to receiving advice from someone else.) But there has not been anything to suggest he has been an abusive husband until Heather made these allegations.

 

His marriage to Linda was regarded as one of the most successful in show business until her death of cancer in the late 1990s. It is testament to Linda & Paul that their offspring have been rather successful in their own rights, and have not appeared staggering drunk out of night clubs (like so many other famous people's offspring) due to their grounded up bringing.

 

Where as Heather Mills has been written about in several publications for alleged embellishments to her life story BEFORE she met Paul McCartney. For example, the journalist Heather Mills of Private Eye magazine has accused Mills of impersonating her for over a year in the late 90s.

 

Articles have also questioned the effectiveness of her charitable work in the Balkans, and she has also come under criticism from disabled people claiming she presumes to speak on their behalf.

 

Tabloid newspaper the News of the World alleged that she was involved in prostitution during an earlier period of her life. Mills has strongly denied the allegations. The Reuters news agency quoted Mills McCartney's lawyers on Tuesday 13 June who issued a statement saying. "Heather is very distressed by this article... she has suffered weight loss, anxiety and sleeping problems as a result of the stress and anxiety of the break-up of her marriage." The statement was made by Stephen Taylor from Buckinghamshire-based solicitors Coyle White Devine. Her lawyers also issued a warning that "She will defer issue of legal proceedings until the arrangements in relation to the divorce are concluded but intends to sue at that stage all parties (including individuals) who are intent on damaging her reputation".

 

In March 2007, British police warned Heather Mills about using the emergency phone number '999' too often. They are quoted as saying they are having to spend a disproportionate amount of time on one particular person. Kevin Moore, the Chief Superintendent of Sussex Police, said that Mills runs "the risk of being treated as the little boy who cried wolf." Mills says that "I didn't waste police time - they encouraged me to use them when I was being harassed." The BBC report that "A spokesman for Lady McCartney said she was nervous after getting death threats and being followed at night." Moore said that "We do have to respond to a disproportionate high volume of calls from Heather Mills McCartney because of the situations she finds herself in, and this is regrettable as it takes officers away from other policing matters."

 

The Sun, which regularly refers to her as "Mucca" (a play on Paul's nickname "Macca"), has responded to Mills' threat to sue by asking her to "tick the boxes" on a series of allegations the paper has made about the former model stating "It is not clear what exactly she plans to sue us about." The paper then asks: "Come on Heather, what exactly did we get wrong? Is it that you're a ..." Underneath the open question, the Sun lists six allegations about the former model, with a blank box beside each one. The words beside the boxes read: "Hooker, Liar, Porn Star, Fantasist, Trouble Maker, Shoplifter".

 

The bottom line is that Paul offered Heather a deal for £35 million + £2.5 million a year but included the clause of a gagging order. Obviously that was not enough for Heather.

 

As for her GMTV interview & her far more offensive interview in the USA, you don't need to be a psychologist to realise that she is mentally unstable right now, with a strange perception on reality.

 

It is also well known that Catherine Tate based one of her most famous characters after a certain famous Geordie Charity worker with a long nose she met at various media events:

 

Paul McCartney has made a fool of himself before when in the early 1980s he befriended Michael Jackson, so much so that Paul allegedly told Michael how much he was bidding to buy the Beatles publishing (Northern Songs). Therefore Michael found out he through his lawyers that there was a clause whereby if he bid £5 million more than the two main songwriters estates (Lennon & McCartney) he could get his hands on the publishing. And that is what Michael did which Paul regarded as an act of treachery.

 

Clearly Paul does have a bit of a vanity issue which is why he fell into the clutches of Heather, despite his children's & friends advice that she was trouble. Hence he paying a price for it now.

Heather Mills is just a woman going through a divorce. If it was someone else, no one would care.

 

People make it out like Paul McCartney is some god, We don't know what went on behind closed doors.

 

 

People make it out like Paul McCartney is some god, We don't know what went on behind closed doors.

Exactly, just because he's a Beatles member dosn't mean that whatever he says is true. No one knows, Heather might be telling the truth afterall.

 

You've got to feel just a BIT sorry for her though. She gets/got nasty press attacks daily, none of us know what its probally like.

yes i do :( but she should stop doing interviews and appearances now as its not helping her at all -_- she needs to try and stay out of the public eye as much as she can now and if they make $h!t up about her she should just complain...i do agree Paul is shown as some sort of god and whatever she does she will never win whether she is right or not

She certainly hasn't done herself any favours with her outbursts this week. She went against advice from the people helping her and it's backfiring in her face. At least Paul has maintained a dignified silence throughout and it's what she should be doing if she has her daughter's best interests at heart.

I've designed a cover to reflect the events of ths past few months for Paul this week... hope you like ;)

 

http://www.buzzjack.com/forums/index.php?s...p;#entry1565804

I lost any respect I had for stumpy when she falsely accused Macca of beating her

 

I take it you lived with Heather and Paul and were with them 24/7 to see he never hit her once in the time they were togeteher.

 

To be honnest, i feel slightly sorry for her for the way the media is portraying her, but she should just shut up and try and get on with the divorce, she says she doesn't like the media introsiosn one week then the next week she is on 20million shows breaking down, she should just step back and re-asses her life and see where she is after the divorce is finalised.

shes crazy and needs help

 

she did 3 live tv show interviews in 6 hours last week - slating the media - stupid woman

urgh, she makes me sick. if shes the f***ing victim. then she shouldn't drag her name through the muck on national tv

i just cant understand this womans thinking...

 

i think its pretty clear that sir paul isnt a wife beater... there has been no such rumours or allegations ever since the 60's, and i remember the beatles! lol.

 

she doesnt want publicity? but she goes on tv to say so? she keeps herself in the public eye?

 

'who says i want any money?' she is upset that shes been called a golddigger but is holding out for a big fat divorce settlement!

 

she is full of contradictions.

 

the worse thing about her tv appearance was when she cried...PMSL! cried my arse! her voice went right on cue but neither on good morning, or when interviewed by the beeb (exactly the same speech, well rehersed, 'crying' at the very same point) did she shed 1 tear.

 

it makes no difference that she was married to sir paul, shes just a horrible person who courts publicity, craves approval, and wants acceptance but is so fcukin transparent its unbelieveable!.she would be disliked no matter who she was divorcing.

I take it you lived with Heather and Paul and were with them 24/7 to see he never hit her once in the time they were togeteher.

 

if you had read tip's post then you wouldnt have said that!

Why when things were quiet and Heather was not in the news for a while, she all of a sudden out of nowhere comes onto a TV show to court hatred all over again?? She seems to feed off the negativity. She's probably thinking that if she starts it all up again , she'll get another spot on a high rating American TV Series.

 

I think people are beyond hating her now. I just think everyone wishes she would just go away and disappear.

But she seems to have some weird personality trait that just won't let her do that.

She acts like she's a bigger star than McCartney.

Edited November 5, 200717 yr by Naomi Watts

All ex-Beatles seem swathed in a bizarre almost Godly cloud where the media is concerned.

 

ALL Beatles wives and girlfriends, from their heyday to now, were publicly ridiculed - all received the full wrath ofd the gutter press, all were publicly crucified.

 

I will not believe that Heather Mills is any different. The ONLY difference with her is she's an outspoken ballsy go-getting lady who won't take this c**p from the media. In fact, all the qualities McCarteny liked about her when he first met her.

 

We seem to be stuck in the age-old belief that women who are like this are bitches- men who do this - ah - good on them - strong blokes.

 

Balderdash.

 

I resent the way this woman has been publicly slaughtered. How dare The Sun call her Mucca, for one thing. Porn past indeed. She was a model - the shots they published of her from that German book - HOW tame were they? They would have been laughed over if they were anyone else - semi-topless shots of her. Like every single model in the world has had photographed - only far tamer.

 

I won't follow blindly the general concensus that she's a cow - I don't think she is at all. Both her and McCartney have both publicly stated that she offered a pre-nup. It was he who refused it. Surely some money-grabbing gold-digging ex-hooker would have insisted upon it to safeguard her interests. She didn't.

 

The claims that he beat both her and his first wife Linda - who knows what went on behind closed doors? Why is everyone here so certain that it didn't happen? She claims to have taped evidence that he did hit Linda - let's hope she releases this evidence. I thinka few McCartney myths need shattering here. One thing is for certain - this blissful life that Paul and Linda apparently had was a myth - several friends and acquaintances have testified to this - and another has backed Heather's claim of physical abuse, too.

 

All this talk of his wonderful children...... whilst they may be refreshingly un-Hollywood, this notion that Stella got where she is today off her own skills and talent is absolute rubbish. A best friend of mine was at fashion college with her, as I've mentioned here before, and she flaunted her connections and family name at every given opportunity.

 

Far from earning her place there - she was given a place because of her name. Her college work was way below par throughout, and she was set to fail all of her finals due to her poor work and tardiness with projects. With Paul and Linda in attendance (front row, other parents were crammed in at the back) at the final fashion show, when students show off their end-of-course designs as modelled by other students..... Ms McCartney trawled through her contacts and had supermodels sashaying down the catwalk for her final show.

 

Result? She passed. Further result - her father managed to place her in one of the top design houses where she surrounded herself with far, far better designers (including one of her ex-coursemates who was far better than her but who bafflingly recieved a lower grade) to design the clothes for her.

 

Mills talks today of Paula Yates - and yes, it IS a very similar situation. Yates was treated like dirt throughout her marriage to a saintly rock star, and when she finally dared leave him for another man after 20 years, she was publicly crucified because, well, how could anyone do this to Saint Bob? Saint Bob who beat her, had numerous affairs and controlled her life to such a degree she even had to ask to use the telephone at home. For leaving him, she was a harlot, a $l*t, a drug-taking waste of skin - her face was pasted over the tabloids daily, there were hundreds of cloumn inches devoted to what a terrible, terrible mother she was and what a bad role model she was.... and how saintly Bob Geldogf was for being such a devoted husband and father. The situation is worryingly similar. The press mauled Paula Yates and ultimately it led to her untimely death. Upon which, the media were in quasi-mourning for a mother's life lost.

 

I'm not saying I like Heather Mills - but I'm saying McCartney is not a saint. Today he is plastered over the tabloids romancing some New York lawyer's wife - a woman who, with her husband, is a fervent supported of the Republicans - donating millions to George Bush's 2004 campaign. Kind of makes a mockery of McCartney's supposed working class, working man's socialist ideals, don't you think?

 

I think McCartney's public and private image are very different. He fully realised the public think "the wrong one died" with John Lennon and he has a team of people around him who have created this saintly image of him as still that grinning, chubby faced little scouser kid who's 'down' with the ordinary man.

 

He isn't...... he's a vain, money-grabbing, self-centred control freak who had such little respect for the memory of the "love of his life" that, within weeks of her passing, he was chasing after a woman just over a quarter his age. And if he's such a God - what on earth would a man this great see in a woman as heinous as Heather Mills? They seemed blissfully happy for 5 years - surely a marriage is a meeting of minds?

 

And as for her past - be rest assured that before they wed, there were stringent checks carried out on every aspect of Heather Mills' life pre-McCartney by his army of people. They found nothing to stop them marrying then - which, to my mind, means there's absolutely nothing there that should sully her name now.

 

The British public seem blind to the fact that even a Beatle can be a hideous piece of work.

Edited November 6, 200717 yr by russt68

I have no sympathy for her anyway :lol:

Screw them I'm sick of hearing about it. She's her own worst enemy - if you don't want the media to hate you go crawl under a rock until they get sick of you not go around on every tv show or to every magazine that will have you spouting absolute $h!t.

 

She should think of herself and her daughter - saying she is suicidal when she has a child. That doesn't evoke sympathy that just makes you wish she'd f uck off.

 

And I don't care for 'Sir' Paul either.

Edited November 6, 200717 yr by Graham

The media would drive anyone to suicide or madness. Look at the harrassment of Diana, of all the Royals, of Britney, Paula Yates, George Michael.... anyone in the public eye is hounded daily like a hunted animal.

 

How would you feel if you had photographers poking their lens through your lounge windows? You car followed everywhere? Your every move scrutinised and dissected? Your bins sifted through? Your friends and family harrassed for any snippet of info? Your telephone constantly ringing for gossip? Your personality distorted in front of millions day after day after day. Would you want to say something back? To get your point across?

 

Considering the treatment she's received since the split, and even when she was wed to McCarteny - is it any wonder she's hitting back? I, for one, don't blame her one bit. I'm just surporised she hasn't done and said more.

 

I would.

russ...

 

never in the 40 plus years ive been a music fan, and has seen the rise of the beatles and maccas life ever since, have i ever heard of any rumour that he hit linda. nor have any of lindas closest friends like carla laine who was on tv saying that its rubbish. ok, its possible that paul might have hit them... but id be VERY surprised that after all these years in the public spotlight that no one has ever thought he did. i might be wrong, but im confident that paul isnt a wife beater.

 

not all the beatles wives were hated, linda wasnt (except at first by girls in love with paul), barbara bach ? ive never heard a word against her.... yoko wasnt liked because she was seen as the one that split the beatles up.

 

the beatles are still rightly respected as the godfathers of popular music, no other act has been responsable for so much material , class material, ground breaking and influencial material.

 

heather mills is blatently playing the media, im shocked that you arnt seeing it! her performance was sickening, if she really wants to be left alone, then she should SHUT TF UP!.