Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
It doesn't particularly matter that the older contests don't have the semi results - I've always found when collating results for various things that having the semi results at the end has been a right pain. Is it possible we could find some sort of compromise between :: and ||? I've never particularly liked ||...

 

LOL at our sadness :lol:

 

01 || 158 || SF1 || 02 || 105 || Ashton - Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission

 

01 || 158 || Ashton - Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission || SF1 || 02 - 105

 

 

The bottom format just looks better to me. Too many numbers at the start otherwise.

 

 

We could indeed come to a compromise, but i'm not having :: anywhere near the new thread.

  • Replies 423
  • Views 62.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How about

 

01 .: 104 .: Mdiče - Britney Spears - And Then We Kiss

02 .: 094 .: Faztickle - Nelly Furtado - Maneater

03 .: 093 .: Kopečka - Jordin Sparks - Tattoo

 

or

 

01 :. 104 .: Mdiče - Britney Spears - And Then We Kiss

02 :. 094 .: Faztickle - Nelly Furtado - Maneater

03 :. 093 .: Kopečka - Jordin Sparks - Tattoo

 

etc

Oh, that second one's actually quite pretty Pavel :o

 

01 .: 158 :. SF1 .: 02 :. 105 .: Ashton - Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission

 

Yeah, that is too many numbers...

 

01 .: 158 :. 1/02/105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission? I quite like that actually!

Whilst I do like ·, having SF results at the end makes collating for various things a reet bitch.
  • Author
How about

 

01 · 99 · Country · Artist · Song [sf1 · 101]

 

etc? :kink:

That damned · pisses me off as much as ::

Hmm, I'm not a fan of the // \\. Takes away the simplicity of the // and renders it almost equivalent to ||. (OH GOD WHAT HAVE I BECOME)

 

Not keen on .: :. then?

How about:

 

01 // 158 \\ Ashton - Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission [sF1:02 - 105]

I like that actually! ;o Maybe if the // \\s were continued along though...

  • Author
Oh, that second one's actually quite pretty Pavel :o

 

01 .: 158 :. SF1 .: 02 :. 105 .: Ashton - Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission

 

Yeah, that is too many numbers...

 

01 .: 158 :. 1/02/105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission? I quite like that actually!

The bolded bit just looks out of place.

 

Hmm, I'm not a fan of the // \\. Takes away the simplicity of the // and renders it almost equivalent to ||. (OH GOD WHAT HAVE I BECOME)

 

Not keen on .: :. then?

I do quite like the

 

01 .: 158 :. Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission

 

It looks quite nice like that

 

I am willing to compromise to the above.

 

 

Now, the semi results.

 

I still want to stick them at the end. While it may inconvenience your results collation, it just looks out of place earlier tbh

Is this seriously a debate on layout?

 

Love JamesP x

Indeed, it is. I'm preparing the noose as we speak.

01 .: 158 :. 1:02:105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

 

01 .: 158 :. 1.:02:.105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

  • Author
01 .: 158 :. 1:02:105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

 

01 .: 158 :. 1.:02:.105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

For sure not the second one.

 

 

01 .: 158 :. [1/02 - 105] Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

 

01 .: 158 :. SF1/02 .: 105 :. Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

01 .: 158 :. 1:02:105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

 

01 .: 158 :. 1.:02:.105 .: Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission?

First one i like better. Second looks a bit heavy.

01 .: 158 :. (SF1/02/105) :. Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission

02 .: 148 :. (SF2/01/135) :. Eledan // Caroline Af Ugglas - Snalla Snalla

  • Author
01 .: 158 :. [sF1/02/105] :. Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission

02 .: 148 :. [sF2/01/135] :. Eledan // Caroline Af Ugglas - Snalla Snalla

 

01 .: 158 :. SF1/02 .: 105 :. Ashton // Gabriella Cilmi - On A Mission

02 .: 148 :. SF2/01 .: 135 :. Eledan // Caroline Af Ugglas - Snalla Snalla

 

 

 

I think [] looks better than () personally.

 

 

One of the above would do quite nicely i think....

I agree, both are good ^_^

 

Intelligent life-changing discussions ftw :w00t:

Edited by Ljósið

.: is so tacky lawlz. I don't understand the problem with ::, it made the page look nice and organized.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.