May 17, 200916 yr There’s less than year left until the next General Election! I can’t see Labour replacing Gordon Brown now it’s the autumn of this parliament. Part of me thinks that England will not vote for a Scottish prime minister; Brown will be screwed over. On the other hand I cannot see a landslide swing towards the Conservatives, I don’t see a strong sea change of public feeling ala the mid nineties; a hung parliament or a majority of <5 seems likely.
May 17, 200916 yr It is quite clear that the country wants a tory government :nocheer: Hardly, the Tory Blair Witch Project is the last thing the country needs... :manson:
May 17, 200916 yr Hopefully a year tomorrow we'll get this lot out and a great new Government in led by David Cameron. I shall stay up and crack open a bottle of champagne the moment he has a majority of one. sometimes i think you are the biggest idiot ive ever met online... YOU wouldnt be better off under the tories you idiot! which is in fact a great excuse to vote for them! you will rejoice that they will cut your benefits? pillock. get to work you bone idle twat.
May 17, 200916 yr Brown should call a general election It is quite clear that the country wants a tory government so Brown is defying the will of the people by clinging onto power, if he is so sure that he is wanted by the country then he has nothing to fear by calling a general election Brown clinging to power is damaging the economy too, businesses have to make key investment decisions and with Cameron taking office next year they are going to hold off investing till Cameron's policies on business take effect no they dont, you are deluded, the boy cameron is NOT what the country wants.
May 17, 200916 yr :nocheer: Hardly, the Tory Blair Witch Project is the last thing the country needs... :manson: Just going by the polls mate, 22% lead now Now that is not massive enthusiasm for Dave it is because they are the only alternative to Labour that have any chance of booting them out, the Lib Dems will always promise much and deliver little in terms of resuls on election night so Dave is winning by default because he is the alternative to Labour I don't think he is right wing enough but he is the only electable alternative to Labour
May 17, 200916 yr Hopefully a year tomorrow we'll get this lot out and a great new Government in led by David Cameron. I shall stay up and crack open a bottle of champagne the moment he has a majority of one. Don't get a hangover as the following morning Osborne will have you out clearing litter in the streets B) Edited May 17, 200916 yr by B.A Baracus
May 17, 200916 yr no they dont, you are deluded, the boy cameron is NOT what the country wants. The country wants an end to Labour with its high tax, high debt, recession, spin and lies and fraud, illegal war and violation of privacy, Cameron will win the next election by a landslide because he is not Brown I would be surprised if his majority is under 140 I don't pretend for one moment that the public have massive enthusiasm for tory party, even I don't find them anywhere near right wing enough these days, but they are going to vote for them en masse because of the damage Labour have done
May 17, 200916 yr Don't get a hangover as the following morning Osborne will have you out clearing litter in the streets B) No he won't as I'll take him to the European Court Of Human Rights. Others on mental health forums say they're planning to do the same. As I said elsewhere, a hornet's nest will open up if they dare try to discriminate against people with depression. Edited May 17, 200916 yr by Crazy Chris
May 17, 200916 yr No he won't as I'll take him to the European Court Of Human Rights. Others on mental health forums say they're planning to do the same. As I said elsewhere, a hornet's nest will open up if they dare try to discriminate against people with depression. They won't be discriminating though. They'll be helping you, giving you something to do and giving you a sense of worth!
May 17, 200916 yr No he won't as I'll take him to the European Court Of Human Rights. Others on mental health forums say they're planning to do the same. As I said elsewhere, a hornet's nest will open up if they dare try to discriminate against people with depression. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/156...Rights-Act.html ;) Cameron is withdrawing the UK from the Human Rights Act so to use the words of of Dirty Harry "You Are $h!t Out Of Luck"
May 18, 200916 yr The country wants an end to Labour with its high tax, high debt, recession, spin and lies and fraud, illegal war and violation of privacy, Cameron will win the next election by a landslide because he is not Brown I would be surprised if his majority is under 140 I don't pretend for one moment that the public have massive enthusiasm for tory party, even I don't find them anywhere near right wing enough these days, but they are going to vote for them en masse because of the damage Labour have done but the tories are as guilty as labour for milking the expenses scheme and unlike the tories labour have had no mps prosecuted for their activities (aitken, archer etc). and would the public support spending on the nhs and education?
May 22, 200916 yr unlike the tories labour have had no mps prosecuted for their activities Only because the system quite clearly protects them..... B-liar should have been prosecuted as a war criminal, Mandelson and Blunkett are as crooked as they come, Tessa Jowell was almost certainly up to no good, and Hazel fukkin' Blears, Chaytor and several others are clearly guilty of FRAUD and TAX EVASION...... :angry: :angry: As for Gordon Brown, he's almost certainly guilty of being culpable in fukkin' up this country's finances... I regard him as an accessory before, during and after the fact in the crimes of the likes of Goodwin, Pell and Applegarth..... Nu Labor are a bunch of lousy, crooked c/unts Rob, they're just a bit cleverer than Aitken and Archer that's all..... But it's pretty clear that the only justice they'll see is Street Justice.....
May 22, 200916 yr but the tories are as guilty as labour for milking the expenses scheme and unlike the tories labour have had no mps prosecuted for their activities (aitken, archer etc). and would the public support spending on the nhs and education? Aitken was jailed for lying during a libel trial, nothing to do with his activities as an MP and Archer was not a serving cabinet minister or had any position of authority he was a Tory peer and again got jailed for activities that had nothing to do with his political status so they are not as bad as the current lot who have been defrauding taxpayers and stealing taxpayers money Edited May 22, 200916 yr by B.A Baracus
May 22, 200916 yr Good god, just imagine, a Tory government. And people honestly think David Cameron would do a better job than Gordon Brown? :lol: Brown's in a really weak position at the moment, it's easy for any politician to knock him down, set themselves up as a better leader. Doesn't mean they are though!
May 22, 200916 yr Good god, just imagine, a Tory government. And people honestly think David Cameron would do a better job than Gordon Brown? :lol: Brown's in a really weak position at the moment, it's easy for any politician to knock him down, set themselves up as a better leader. Doesn't mean they are though! Oh I don't trust Cameron as far as I could throw him, I wanted David Davis to win the leadership contest was gutted when Tory Blair got in, Cameron is too centrist for me and will carry on the Blair years of spin and style over substance but Cameron is the only serious alternative to Brown and that is why he will get in The Lib Dems lost any credibility they had with the ridiculous way they treated Charles Kennedy Edited May 22, 200916 yr by B.A Baracus
May 22, 200916 yr Aitken was jailed for lying during a libel trial, nothing to do with his activities as an MP and Archer was not a serving cabinet minister or had any position of authority he was a Tory peer and again got jailed for activities that had nothing to do with his political status so they are not as bad as the current lot who have been defrauding taxpayers and stealing taxpayers money Aitken and Archer are liars, they got sent down for lying in a court of law..... As far as I see it, the only real difference is that Aitken and Archer were stupid enough to tell their lies to a court, and not to the people of this country.... -_- Just why lying to a court should be considered worse than lying to every single tax-payer and voter in the land is really beyond me tbh..... <_<
May 22, 200916 yr Aitken and Archer are liars, they got sent down for lying in a court of law..... As far as I see it, the only real difference is that Aitken and Archer were stupid enough to tell their lies to a court, and not to the people of this country.... -_- Just why lying to a court should be considered worse than lying to every single tax-payer and voter in the land is really beyond me tbh..... <_< All MP's lie, some are just worse at being caught Aitken and Archer's libel actions that cost them their liberty were privately funded so cost the taxpayer nothing that is why I think they are on a lesser scale than the fraud and theft that has been exposed recently as it involves my money and yours, Archer and Aitken used their own
Create an account or sign in to comment