Cascada is actually going faster than La Roux was :w00t:

 

Not really

 

La Roux went 251-50-29-11-9-

Then stayed at 9 for a bit, went up to 7, stayed a bit, went up to 5 then 4, stayed a bit, up to 3, stayed, up to 2, stayed, then up to 1.

Edited June 28, 200915 yr by B-rye

Not really

 

La Roux went 251-50-29-11-9-

Then stayed at 9 for a bit, went up to 7, stayed a bit, went up to 5 then 4, stayed a bit, up to 3, stayed, up to 2, stayed, then up to 1.

Cascada went 93-49-41

Cascada went 93-49-41

 

466-93-49-41- ;)

 

I think both were beaten by Tinchy though. 58-20-4-3-2-2-1

Edited June 28, 200915 yr by B-rye

466-93-49-41- ;)

Oh okay, but I was counting top 300 ;)

la roux was at 9 this time last week so who is faster cascada or la roux

Cascada only up to 39.

la roux was at 9 this time last week so who is faster cascada or la roux

If you'd read this previous conversation you'd know ;)

Cascada is actually going faster than La Roux was :w00t:

Not really

 

La Roux went 251-50-29-11-9-

La Roux was #10 by 1pm, and #2 by 5.30pm

 

However, you can't really compare the their chart runs because:

1. All of the Michael Jackson tracks above Cascada.
2. Without all the MJ tracks, La Roux had more visible time in the Top 100 and Top 10, which does affect the speed at which a song rises.

 

 

Edited June 28, 200915 yr by britster

MJ MINTM wasnt played in thgis weeks top 2o singles offical by chartshow

Can you imagine if Cascada kept Michael Jackson off number one? :heehee: Oh the hate.

Can you imagine if Cascada kept Michael Jackson off number one? :heehee: Oh the hate.

 

I'd destroy something.

Can you imagine if Cascada kept Michael Jackson off number one? :heehee: Oh the hate.

I'd actually be glad. Michael Jackson has had his time, he needs to let the stars of today get a number 1, he's already had 8 or something

I don't know what to think. I think it would be unfair if Cascada didn't go #1 because of MJ while other perfomers get that #1 easily in other normal week. From the other side #1 for Michael would be kinda respect for him and he deserves #1 much more than Cascada.

I'd actually be glad. Michael Jackson has had his time, he needs to let the stars of today get a number 1, he's already had 8 or something

 

Six.

And he just died for cheese's sake.

 

Wait, seven, not six. It's because chartstats.com lists artists with featured artsists as separate artists xP

Edited June 28, 200915 yr by B-rye

 

88. Sticks 'n' Stones - Jamie T

 

His EP is #11 on the iTunes Albums chart. Minus the MJ albums, and he'd be #4 :o

 

 

 

 

88. Sticks 'n' Stones - Jamie T

 

His EP is #11 on the iTunes Albums chart. Minus the MJ albums, and he'd be #4 :o

 

Ooh, I hope this does well :D

Runnin' from believers, no time for beaver.

Edited June 28, 200915 yr by B-rye

 

33. Evacuate the Dancefloor (Radio Edit) - Cascada

 

#23 minus the MJ tracks

 

 

Edited June 28, 200915 yr by britster

Where did Cascada peak at, as this is probably most likely hopefully definately wishful-thinkingly going to outpeak it

Evacuate the charts, make room for Cascada! :w00t:

Jamie T #84 :cheer: