March 31, 201015 yr :rofl: Wood. That cracked me up! Almost as much as saying Gold is good for aSugababes album :rofl:
March 31, 201015 yr LOL. I love her really. The sales are awful for her, but she has everything else going for her so the problem clearly isn't her. All her critics picked up on the lyrical content, her effortless vocal performances throughout the album, etc. She just needs a label that understands an artist like her. She'd be a good indie artist. She needs to start utilising the Internet though - using her Myspace page more, getting on Twitter, etc to build her fanbase even more.
March 31, 201015 yr Did C&S seriosuly only sell 122k? I always thought they were much closer to the 200k mark than that :(
March 31, 201015 yr Did C&S seriosuly only sell 122k? I always thought they were much closer to the 200k mark than that :( I think they shipped it, but for sales it's around 122k.
March 31, 201015 yr offtopic/ Steve's a Mess, could you post the photos of your sig in HQ please? thx :). I'll post them in the gallery thread :)
March 31, 201015 yr Steve it's amazing! Best suga sig iv seen so far x. Anyway all three of the girls havnt wrote anything about sweet7 since it charted
March 31, 201015 yr Almost as much as saying Gold is good for aSugababes album :rofl: Of course it's not. But it's not THAT bad how lots of people describe it. As for last summer it was sold by 200k (110k UK and 90k non-UK) worldwide, and those non-UK 90k are really profitable when we take into account that they had practically zero promotion outside the UK. They hadn't many costs inside UK too: both videos were on a pretty low budget; the production team didn't cost so much either especially given that the most of the album is co-written by the Babes; the massive promo was only for 'Girls'. And that's it. And 122k +~90k + pretty good sales of 'Girls' make the whole campaign profitable which counts the most after all. They are on great losses on 'Sweet 7' album - yes, with retailers' revenue of only about 500k-550k pounds worldwide (including the singles sales). But C&S was profitable even it was a flop for Sugababes standarts. Edited March 31, 201015 yr by Arrs
April 3, 201015 yr i hate it when people say catfights was a flop album because it really wasnt it was just bad compared to the sugas standerds
April 3, 201015 yr i hate it when people say catfights was a flop album because it really wasnt it was just bad compared to the sugas standerds And by those standards, it was a flop. By the standards of an established act who's been around for years, it was a flop. Even the ladies themselves admitted it. There's no shame in having a flop providing the material is good - and the material WAS good.
April 3, 201015 yr i hate it when people say catfights was a flop album because it really wasnt it was just bad compared to the sugas standerds You have to admit to it, it was a flop album. Especially since all their previous albums apart from 'One Touch' had sold 500k+.
April 3, 201015 yr i hate it when people say catfights was a flop album because it really wasnt it was just bad compared to the sugas standerds It was a flop. Mutya got dropped for only selling 100k.