May 23, 201114 yr Well, technically no, but everyone is. Just typed his name into google and the stories about him are building by the minute. He's fucked now, anyway.
June 1, 201114 yr Poor Imogen, feel so sorry for her after all this, that footballer should be ashamed. He is an utter slag. "Poor imogen", she's a f**king whore for goodness' sake... She basically blackmailed Giggs, demanding 10k or she'd blab to the tabloids... Money for sex = whore in my book..... And £10K???? Blimey, she does think rather a lot of herself.... Not that I'm defending Giggs though, a supposed "family man", he should've kept it zipped up and not be dipping his wick in skanky whores like Thomas, but blackmail and soliciting money for sex is a slightly more serious matter than an extra-marital affair, certainly legally anyway... Where Giggs went wrong was getting the super-injunction (and, really, the story became a LOT more about the issue of injunctions and "press freedom" rather than where Ryan Giggs chose to stick his prick. I mean, since when did the likes of The Independent, Telegraph or The Guardian give a toss about a footballer's extra-marital affairs enough to stick it on the front page?)... What he should have done is just cop to it and then report Thomas to the cops for blackmail and demanding money.... Then the story would've been about Imogen Thomas, the whore, being nicked for blackmail.... But, really this whole issue has become ridiculous anyway, it's really not the debate we should be having surrounding the concept of "freedom of the press", what we should be discussing in relation to this is the American Govt refusing to release footage or photos of the death of Bin Laden.... As it is, we can only hope Wikileaks gets a hold of the stuff and then gives it to someone like Russia Today or Al Jazeera who would actually have the guts to use it....
June 1, 201114 yr A new Twitter user has posted ALLEGED injunctions of which there is no evidence of truth - DELETED
June 1, 201114 yr A new Twitter user has posted ALLEGED injunctions of which there is no evidence of truth - Dude, I'm pretty sure posting that link up could expose BJ to the threat of being sued... I mean, I'm no legal expert or anything, but..... :mellow:
June 1, 201114 yr Well Tirren posted a similar one a few pages back, and I'm pretty sure as long as we make it clear they are ALLEGED then we're legally clear... If you're unsure as moderator obviously feel free to edit it out though.
June 1, 201114 yr That Twitter user is absolutely disgusting. You couldn't even argue that most of those were in 'the public interest'. I mean that one about Tony Blair's daughter is horrendous and none of ANYBODY's business. Who the fuck does this guy think he is? I sincerely hope somebody manages to sue.
June 1, 201114 yr "Poor imogen", she's a f**king whore for goodness' sake... She basically blackmailed Giggs, demanding 10k or she'd blab to the tabloids... Money for sex = whore in my book..... And £10K???? Blimey, she does think rather a lot of herself.... Not that I'm defending Giggs though, a supposed "family man", he should've kept it zipped up and not be dipping his wick in skanky whores like Thomas, but blackmail and soliciting money for sex is a slightly more serious matter than an extra-marital affair, certainly legally anyway... Where Giggs went wrong was getting the super-injunction (and, really, the story became a LOT more about the issue of injunctions and "press freedom" rather than where Ryan Giggs chose to stick his prick. I mean, since when did the likes of The Independent, Telegraph or The Guardian give a toss about a footballer's extra-marital affairs enough to stick it on the front page?)... What he should have done is just cop to it and then report Thomas to the cops for blackmail and demanding money.... Then the story would've been about Imogen Thomas, the whore, being nicked for blackmail.... But, really this whole issue has become ridiculous anyway, it's really not the debate we should be having surrounding the concept of "freedom of the press", what we should be discussing in relation to this is the American Govt refusing to release footage or photos of the death of Bin Laden.... As it is, we can only hope Wikileaks gets a hold of the stuff and then gives it to someone like Russia Today or Al Jazeera who would actually have the guts to use it.... ALLEGED BLACKMAIL.
June 1, 201114 yr Having followed the link I have deleted it. The chances of action being taken against BJ may be slim but I don't think it's worth the risk.
June 1, 201114 yr ALLEGED BLACKMAIL. Yes, okay, fair enough... "Alleged".. Pretty sure that £10k is what the Tabloid paid her for her "story" though... Bit of a coincidence innit...? And, she's still a whore regardless, if you have sex and get someone to pay for it, then it's prostitution... It's just a legal form of prostitution if you manage to get a newspaper to pay for it by proxy, and also sell a story..... I really think people who engage in this sort of "Kiss and Tell" thing are of pretty low character generally....
Create an account or sign in to comment