October 20, 201410 yr Don't be so negative! They have a much stronger fan base than Katy Perry! http://h4.abload.de/img/britney-laugh-radio-giirz1.gif
October 24, 201410 yr I've had the Greatest Hits on today and it geniunely depresses me how underappreciated these girls are. Their management across Europe cost them dearly! If 'What About Us' was promoted in Germany I fully believe it could have went top 20 at least! It peaked at #13 in New Zealand and they should have promoted in Australia. It's just depressing thinking what could have been. 'Higher' and 'What About Us' were their biggest missed opportunities.
October 24, 201410 yr If they promoted worldwide after their first album I even think they would have done good, Up and Issues have very wide appeal, they could have given Work a shot too, then Forever Is Over and Ego sound like they would appeal worldwide too... they have missed a lot of oppurtunities.
October 24, 201410 yr Author If they promoted worldwide after their first album I even think they would have done good, Up and Issues have very wide appeal, they could have given Work a shot too, then Forever Is Over and Ego sound like they would appeal worldwide too... they have missed a lot of oppurtunities. They have missed too many, can't agree anymore! Higher for me would have been the perfect lead; that entire summer of 2010 could have changed everything for them really.
October 24, 201410 yr Their best time to launch was definitely early 2011. They had solidified their place in the UK as THE girl band (admittedly there was no competition but they were very successful on radio, chart wise and sales wise regardless) and there were no pregnancies to hold them back. To be fair I think they thought the On Your Radar era was going to be the massive one that would make them huge but when that flopped they tried to get a worldwide deal through another means (reality TV). It's far too late now. There's nothing wrong with being a UK only act but these days it seems everyone is getting success Europe/America wise. Look at The Vamps for example!
October 24, 201410 yr Their best time to launch was definitely early 2011. They had solidified their place in the UK as THE girl band (admittedly there was no competition but they were very successful on radio, chart wise and sales wise regardless) and there were no pregnancies to hold them back. To be fair I think they thought the On Your Radar era was going to be the massive one that would make them huge but when that flopped they tried to get a worldwide deal through another means (reality TV). It's far too late now. There's nothing wrong with being a UK only act but these days it seems everyone is getting success Europe/America wise. Look at The Vamps for example! Totally agree; even Higher was used during the X Factor sponsor adds in 2011/2012 (I think) so they definitely were the main girlband. Competition was there but bands were never able to stay relevant for longer than a second.
October 24, 201410 yr But are they really here?! http://data7.blog.de/media/950/6307950_41a7c399e5_m.jpeg
October 24, 201410 yr I love that making music seems to be their primary aim. Erm, I think being celebrities is their primary aim, making music is just their main way to achieve that I would say. It does seem like "being a popstar" sounds like a hobby to them more than anything at the moment. Either way, I'm just thirsty for more music. As I suggested on Popjustice, they really should start doing EPs every summer. All of the artists that don't sell shit do that, so why not them? It's not like they have some insane amount of money thrown their way at the moment and it does seem like they have started since a moment to self-fund their releases with their endorsements money. An EP would mean less expenses for probably just the same amount of sales. In fact, the general public might be more interested in a EP with 5 great tracks than an album they believe is 5 great tracks and 7 fillers. Who knows. Oh just give me solo Mollie. :wub:
October 24, 201410 yr Oh most definitely; I mean that in the way that it's what these endorsements and "celebrity enhancing" factors eventually lead to - new music.
October 24, 201410 yr Erm, I think being celebrities is their primary aim, making music is just their main way to achieve that I would say. It does seem like "being a popstar" sounds like a hobby to them more than anything at the moment. Either way, I'm just thirsty for more music. As I suggested on Popjustice, they really should start doing EPs every summer. All of the artists that don't sell shit do that, so why not them? It's not like they have some insane amount of money thrown their way at the moment and it does seem like they have started since a moment to self-fund their releases with their endorsements money. An EP would mean less expenses for probably just the same amount of sales. In fact, the general public might be more interested in a EP with 5 great tracks than an album they believe is 5 great tracks and 7 fillers. Who knows. Oh just give me solo Mollie. :wub: Could you imagine getting Sats material as well as solo Mollie material at the same time?
October 24, 201410 yr Solo Mollie Material Hit Me Baby A Second Time [Charts at #1, sells 740k] I'm not a girl, i'm a women [Album] [Charts at #1, sells 450k] EDITED by Hurricane, at your service boo. I saw a few mistakes and thought "hey, what not correct my babe". There you go, love. Edited October 25, 201410 yr by Hurricane
October 25, 201410 yr Can you imagine if they somehow did became the female version of Take That (on a much lesser scale obviously :lol:)? Rochelle and Mollie could be the Gary and Robbie with the "big" solo careers (meaning two top 40 singles each) and then every two or three years the girls re-unite for albums and tours? *drools*
October 25, 201410 yr Such a cool thought :D I think the EP thing could work. It won't hurt their chart stats and they could still keep releasing music
Create an account or sign in to comment