Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

ok, i have a real bee in my bonnet about this c**p..

 

the conspiracy theory suggesting that man did not set foot on the moon is utter c**p... every one of the conspiracy theorists claims has been completely, scientifically, disproved.

 

they reckon about flag waving in the breeze.... eh? you reckon that they would forget that? and wheres the breeze coming from in a sealed (as it had to be) hanger?...lol.. the flag waved as it settled down as there is no atmosphere on the moon , so there was nothing to stop it moving when it was wriggled in!!

 

ive seen a programme on discovery.... they took every one of the conspiracy theorists claims, and disproved every one, under scientific conditions... replicating the scenes. not only that but im old enough to have seen the landings on tv, there was never any doubt at the time that the missions went there as they were tracked on radar.

 

the conspiracy theorists ONLY FOCUS ON THE FIRST moon landing... so what about ALL THE OTHERS? of course as technology improved then so did the cameras, and better images were available.

 

there is no doubt in my mind that man has been to the moon, on 8 (?) occassions (by 72 it was rather a non event and we only remember the first, not all the subsequent), and we are planning to return there within ten years.

 

THE MAIN POINT THOUGH IS THIS............ i cannot sit back and have these LIES passed off as the truth.. i am 100% confident that man has been to the moon, and will not allow medieval supersticions to hold back progress...

  • Replies 32
  • Views 7.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It does sound a bit dodgy. There's something about the thickness of the lead not being enough to get through the radiation/vaccum thing too, and that they used the same shots of earth on different occasions.

 

  • Author

It does sound a bit dodgy. There's something about the thickness of the lead not being enough to get through the radiation/vaccum thing too, and that they used the same shots of earth on different occasions.

 

 

EVERY claim was analysed under scientific conditions and proved to be wrong.

  • Author

Yeah but they obviously would want to cover it up lol

 

 

but who is supposed to be covering up from whom?.. theres not 1 scientist from the time who doesnt doubt it happend, all these conspiracy theories didnt exist before the bloody x-files, ten years ago put ideas into peoples heads!.... beware the bogeymen! lol. questioning things is good, believing c**p without examining all the facts however smacks of medieval peasantry...

 

before he dies, get in touch with sir patrick moore, (long time astronomer) see what he thinks of these theories...lol..

I loved the film Capricorn one,it showed how to fake it ;)
  • Author

well by todays standards .... you have a point, but photography was still very primitive in the late 60's, most photos were still black and white! no colour! you lot with your digi cameras have it so bloody easy! point and click... we had light meters, settings (shutter speed/appeture size)etc to adjust just to have half a chance of taking a half decent pic...

 

back on topic please!

We had a topic on this before. :unsure:

I do believe we went to the moon(even before the offical date), but also that pictures where taken in a studio(as a backup if for no other reason). No big deal really. This situation was after all at the height of the cold war and a good bit of propaganda is good for moral.

 

  • Author

We had a topic on this before. :unsure:

I do believe we went to the moon(even before the offical date), but also that pictures where taken in a studio(as a backup if for no other reason). No big deal really. This situation was after all at the height of the cold war and a good bit of propaganda is good for moral.

 

 

cant see how we got there before the official date, i followed the appolo programme as did everyone else and if anything they went TOO SOON, took enourmous risks that would never be allowed today.

 

i dont think that for 1 moment any of the pics are fake, as that documentary demonstrated by reconstructing the scenes.

 

questioning the landings (note plural) is a modern phenomenon that didnt exist before the mid 90's... thats 25 odd years after the event..... just goes to demonstrate the inaccuracy times can have on supposed events... (like the bible being written 60 years after jesus death... )

I have absolutely no doubt that man has landed on the moon, I'm just not entirely 100% convinced that the first time it happened was when they said it happened is all. It's all too tied up in the desire for the US to get one over on the Soviets after they they got Yuri Gegarin into space before the US did, the powers that be in the US could not countenance another Soviet propaganda victory, so... Doubts still exist in my mind, no matter what the scientists say about Neil Armstrong and co....

the flag one really gets me though. I do not believe the whole a/c story.

 

What did they have, huge hoovers in their helmets :rofl:

  • Author

the flag one really gets me though. I do not believe the whole a/c story.

 

What did they have, huge hoovers in their helmets :rofl:

 

 

the flag thing was clearly vindicated as normal, it was not blowing in any wind, but as there is no atmosphere it took ages to stop moving after it had been planted, all subsequent footage shows a perfectly still flag... another fact that the conspiracy theorists convieniently overlook.

then you are a fool....

 

everyone is allowed their own opinion on what happened or not -_-

  • Author

everyone is allowed their own opinion on what happened or not -_-

 

 

which is the point of this thread..

 

i dont believe 9/11 took place, it was a film set up by bush in order to wage war for oil...

 

i dont believe phil exists, i believe 'he' is a giant hedgehog (called spikey norman for mpfc fans lol)

 

i dont believe you are who you say you are...

 

 

nonsense isnt it!

 

ignoring FACTS is just plain stupid, trying to re-write history or believeing in bad science will only hinder progress.

 

the whole of the world watched the space missions... we did, with out tracking stations (joderal bank), sir patrick moore followed the programme.... if they didnt go, then why should an eminant scientist like moore and the british astronomical community (let alone the rest of the developed world) not kick up a fuss and expose the fraud at the time?... russia in particular would have!!!!

 

people who believe in theories based on bad science are simply fools.

 

Of course they landed on the frigging moon. Several times. These conspiracy theories are just bonkers. :wacko:
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.