Jump to content

Featured Replies

First entry for 2023 that I can actually enjoy.

Edited by Colm

  • Replies 75
  • Views 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Strong performance and a smart choice for a televote only semi which, in retrospect, I could see Honestly getting lost in. I do wonder what the vocals will sound like in Liverpool without autotune though?
I'm sad for Ulrikke, but this is still comfortably my favourite entry chosen so far this year, and will likely be round about my top 5 once everything is chosen.

this song is FIRE :cheer:

 

I’m glad we’re getting something in the vein of Run To The Hills - justice has been served!

blasted MGP organisers tanking the most popular song in the country and best chance at knocking down the Eurovision competition by putting it on first

 

despite 'Queen Of Kings' being a blatant ripoff it's still very good though, should do respectably

  • Author
Queen of Kings running away with the points :o Lots of bangers left in the semi unfortunately but I'd have loved Elsie Bay tbh. That being said this should do well for Norway again.

This was a very good year for MGP overall, the winner is great, and should be competitive on the televote at least, hopefully with the juries too.

 

I'm also very much into Ekko inni meg, the Basshunter-style Eurodance revival in the national finals is in full swing this year. Shame it didn't do better with the televote as it's such a big domestic hit.

this is the easy standout of what's been announced as an entry so far having skimmed a recap before watching this one proper - strong pop tune
The live version of this is so powerful, it's going to do so well. The studio version lacks a bit of punch though. And it's too bloody short. They could easily have fit in another chorus.
  • 2 weeks later...

This is going somewhat viral on Tik Tok (alongside Loreen).

 

It's a BOP!

The live version of this is so powerful, it's going to do so well. The studio version lacks a bit of punch though. And it's too bloody short. They could easily have fit in another chorus.

 

It's Eurovision, the songs are required to be short :kink:

 

(In fairness this song did have a spare 30 seconds by the looks of it but still kind of amused to see this comment appearing in the Eurovision forum of all places)

It's Eurovision, the songs are required to be short :kink:

 

(In fairness this song did have a spare 30 seconds by the looks of it but still kind of amused to see this comment appearing in the Eurovision forum of all places)

You say that as if it's a stupid comment. You literally just acknowledged the song is 30 seconds under the limit.

 

Songs often need to cut or change something from the studio version to fit to the 3 minute limit. This song is just really short and can easily fit in another chorus.

Edited by PaulM1983

You say that as if it's a stupid comment. You literally just acknowledged the song is 30 seconds under the limit.

 

Songs often need to cut or change something from the studio version to fit to the 3 minute limit. This song is just really short and can easily fit in another chorus.

 

There is an intro (I think it's in Italian) in the live version that hasn't been added to the studio version.

You say that as if it's a stupid comment. You literally just acknowledged the song is 30 seconds under the limit.

 

Songs often need to cut or change something from the studio version to fit to the 3 minute limit. This song is just really short and can easily fit in another chorus.

 

I'm just saying even if it was 3 minutes long that's still pretty short. As all Eurovision songs are, because it's in the rules.

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.