The year end survivors had been running with 2 rounds at a time for many years. For a few months I have been trialling running 3 rounds at a time and I would like to hear which you prefer.

Do you find having 3 rounds at a time feels too rushed or overwhelming? Does it clutter the forum too much?

Alternatively do you find it even more enjoyable having 3 rounds a time? Does it allow a greater variety of tracks to be considered at any one time? Do you like the fact that we are progressing more repidly?

I personally don't mind whether it's 2 or 3, although I sometimes miss rounds if I have a busy weekend or a busy few days. My only thing with the new layout of the site is I find it harder to keep track of which ones are new or which ones I've already participated in, but I assume in time I'll find a of getting used to it.

I prefer 3 at a time.

3 is ok with me. I tend to vote in them all together so doesn’t really matter too much to me if it’s 2 or 3.

Edited March 14Mar 14 by gooddelta

I like having 3. Some lists aren't as interesting as others so it's nice for variety. In fact, when I was doing these Survivors I decided to post two at a time because one of the lists bored the crap out of me.

Yeah am fine with staying with 3 too. Did wonder if it was too much for some and thought it could be better to go to 2 again but we don't need to seeing the other responses here and tbh the arguments for better groups running alongside the not so good ones is another reason why it's better to stick with the way we are now too.

3 is ok imo.