"Katy Perry Thinks She's The Victim"

Katy Perry, a name you've heard time after time. Maybe you think she's a pop princess, or maybe you see her as a woman who's fading into the abyss and is soon to be forgotten. Whether or not you think she is or have heard the flop of the, the, erm... let's just say "interesting" album that '143' was, I hope we can both agree that what I'm going to tell you is crazy.

And before you ask, no, I'm not mainly going to talk about her album fails again or about her space flight; this is something completely new, her tours. (Although I will throw in a few references to her flight because it's so historic that I can't go without mentioning it.)

For anyone wondering, a Katy Perry tour ticket costs around a hundred pounds or sometimes goes for a couple of hundred, and for any foreigner, that's quite a bit of money. So you expect to see top-notch Katy, right? Or at least good, Katy?
Yeah, you're about to be so disappointed that you don't even realise.

Well, let's start with what you would expect from the tour; surely the choreography can't disappoint, right? I'll let you decide; here are a few of Katy's performances on the '143' tour.

1. Katy runs out onto stage with a lightsabre to fight some Star Wars character and then pulls some moves that the Star Wars characters did while other animated characters are just fighting on stage for no reason.

2. Warms up by doing robotic-like dance moves before being lifted up in the air for some trick; this ultimately ends in her lifting up 2 feet or so before falling over backwards onto the floor.

3. Oh, you thought this tour was over? Nuh-uh, Katy cleverly crafted something in the background filling the whole screen of the concert, AI images of robot cats and her – what a cleverly crafted idea! Congrats to ChatGPT for thinking of it.

4. She fought a tube with steam coming out of it (rumoured to be a malfunction.)

But wait… there's more! Katy Perry's tours aren't actually selling well right which results in re-sales. If you're lucky enough, you might get to see the astronaut herself, Katy Perry. For Katy, spending 11 minutes somewhere is a lot of time, so she must value every second she spends with her fans.

But after all this and overpricing concerts with low-quality audio and giving performances that you could find in a McDonald's playpark, Katy had enough; how dare she get criticised for everything she's done for the country (and, of course, the fellow space investigators)? Katy spoke about how she felt she's being kicked around like a "human piñata". Katy, the only thing getting hit like a human piñata is you when you fell backwards a whopping two feet on the '143' tour.

So, tell me what you think: does Katy deserve the hate? Or are you with me and agree that a Red Bull can give you wings longer than Katy Perry's flight lasted?

I agree the tour doesn’t look great but the pure hatred and venom people have online is disgusting. No one deserves that level of hate for simply doing their job. Sure criticise her performances / songs but some of the things I’ve seen online are horrific bringing her daughter into things and people seem to be jumping on the hate train like the latest fashion.

Death treats simply because she worked with a producer? She’s made countless mistakes / things in poor taste but it’s going to far to the point I’m concerned how it’s all going to pan out because she was once one of the biggest / most loved stars in the world and it’s such a fall from where she was.

Genuinely hope she’s ok and I don’t think she’s playing the victim more speaking out about how things are affecting her which it would anyone.

Her tour isn’t just her decisions either and it’s clear the label / tour producers have given her a cut budget.

33 minutes ago, Mr. C. Joel said:

I agree the tour doesn’t look great but the pure hatred and venom people have online is disgusting. No one deserves that level of hate for simply doing their job. Sure criticise her performances / songs but some of the things I’ve seen online are horrific bringing her daughter into things and people seem to be jumping on the hate train like the latest fashion.

Death treats simply because she worked with a producer? She’s made countless mistakes / things in poor taste but it’s going to far to the point I’m concerned how it’s all going to pan out because she was once one of the biggest / most loved stars in the world and it’s such a fall from where she was.

Genuinely hope she’s ok and I don’t think she’s playing the victim more speaking out about how things are affecting her which it would anyone.

Her tour isn’t just

I used to like Katy Perry more.

I think that most of this criticism is coming from a humorous point of view, the death threats and extra stuff is obviously terrible, nobody deserves that.

I also really don't think she's putting real effort into this anymore, the tour and album hate is deserved, along with other questionable things I've heard about her such as with the nuns and Justin Beiber.

I avoided saying what I really feel about her because it might come across bad. She doesn’t seem all there to me. Like I don’t feel like I’m watching a human who knows what she’s doing or saying. She’s on autopilot kind of thing. I also don’t think think she’s very bright. Aside from that I feel bad for her as she’s 40 not really able to deliver anything more than she is and the people advising her are just trying to make money but often it’s sketchy career moves for her

40 minutes ago, Mellope said:

I used to like Katy Perry more.

I think that most of this criticism is coming from a humorous point of view, the death threats and extra stuff is obviously terrible, nobody deserves that.

I also really don't think she's putting real effort into this anymore, the tour and album hate is deserved, along with other questionable things I've heard about her such as with the nuns and Justin Beiber.

I think people are ‘taking the piss’ out of her and laughing at her expense though. It can’t be nice for her to read.

Let’s face it she’s past her peak in her career and not all artists are able to stay relevant and I think it’s a case of that.

She’s not really sure which direction to go in probably pressure from label bosses and it’s just all a bit of a mess.

I genuinely think she could release one of her best albums and people would still hate on her unfortunately like I said everyone is jumping on the hate train.

I saw her at Capital Jingle Bell ball and she was actually great! Her vocals were a little ropey in places but she’s always been the same in that respect.

As a Katy fan I can see both sides to the debate.

I think she's become an easy target over the years and I noticed it starting with when she cut her hair short. From then on, Katy became a bit of a laughing stock online even when it wasn't really necessary. The Witness era was tarred by it, and you can say what you want about the music but I do wonder whether, had the haircut not happened, the album would be better received by some (not saying that's the case for all, it's not my personal fave Katy album but it's better than its reputation suggests).

I think her time away between Smile and 143 had seen some goodwill build up for Katy, though. Nostalgia was starting to kick in for her first two albums, and people were remembering just how amazing an era Teenage Dream in particular was. People wanted to see her do well, but we know how it went. Working with Dr. Luke was a catastrophic decision when the goodwill was largely coming from online, where people are very much aware of the allegations against him. I don't believe that nobody on her team thought to point out it was a pretty bad angle for Katy to take, so the fact she committed to it has led to a not-undeserved backlash. Adding insult to injury is that the music was largely very faceless and without the personality Katy never usually lacked.

That said, death threats are never okay, and people take it too far. Again, she's become the butt of the joke online, and whilst I think she's brought some of the negativity on herself, people don't know when to stop and for some reason, it feels like Katy is fair game.

I've not seen the setlist for the tour, nor any footage from it, as I'm attending it myself later in the year and want to remain spoiler-free, so I can't comment on that aspect and can't say whether this is yet another case of Katy being an easy target, but the space mission definitely feels like an example of Katy becoming a laughing stock for some. The mission as a whole is a little ludicrous with how short it was (and how much money it must have cost for such a short trip to go ahead), but it didn't feel like a lot of the jokes were laughing with Katy, but at her.

I don't think it's fair to comment on her intelligence level, we don't know her in that way, but I find some of the discourse quite tedious whilst also knowing she brought much of the recent backlash on herself.

23 minutes ago, Mr. C. Joel said:

I think people are ‘taking the piss’ out of her and laughing at her expense though. It can’t be nice for her to read.

Let’s face it she’s past her peak in her career and not all artists are able to stay relevant and I think it’s a case of that.

She’s not really sure which direction to go in probably pressure from label bosses and it’s just all a bit of a mess.

I genuinely think she could release one of her best albums and people would still hate on her unfortunately like I said everyone is jumping on the hate train.

I saw her at Capital Jingle Bell ball and she was actually great! Her vocals were a little ropey in places but she’s always been the same in that respect.

As a non biased person, I just really didn't like '143.' And I was never a Katy hater before it.

If you take away bits and pieces from every show on planet, you can make it seem like "what were they thinking"... I mean Lady Gaga had her Enigma trainwreck which is actually a great show it you see it in full but it has some questionable parts like the wig (which is ICONIC already lol) and the dialogue with Enigma her digital "alter ego". I myself see it as the starting point of what Mayhem become where the duality is present, in a form of "bad" and "good". But, regardless, the show is regarded as a low-point of her career by fans today.

Then back to Katy, Witness didn't really kill her career imo. She had a big hit with Feels in the UK and Never Really Over reached top 20 in the US. What did hurt her though is the very narrow comfort zone she has been staying since day 1. Even Miley Cyrus has been able to try stuff and explore things, not always succeeding but still exploring. I think Katy doesn't really properly care about being a pop star. She is more like celebrity and entertainer type of person in my books.

Her hits have received brilliant number of streams so I don't know if people are really hating her. At least they are still curious and eager to revisit her music. Last Friday Night is #111 on global Spotify as we speak. But after a certain point it is always difficult to sell NEW music to people and the gigantic mess with Dr. Luke didn't help (nor did the uninspired choices she has made).

That said, the European leg of the tour is almost sold out and she'll do just fine with it.

So, I don't know, she is a very interesting case study of pop culture right now.

18 minutes ago, JosephBoone said:

As a Katy fan I can see both sides to the debate.

I think she's become an easy target over the years and I noticed it starting with when she cut her hair short. From then on, Katy became a bit of a laughing stock online even when it wasn't really necessary. The Witness era was tarred by it, and you can say what you want about the music but I do wonder whether, had the haircut not happened, the album would be better received by some (not saying that's the case for all, it's not my personal fave Katy album but it's better than its reputation suggests).

I think her time away between Smile and 143 had seen some goodwill build up for Katy, though. Nostalgia was starting to kick in for her first two albums, and people were remembering just how amazing an era Teenage Dream in particular was. People wanted to see her do well, but we know how it went. Working with Dr. Luke was a catastrophic decision when the goodwill was largely coming from online, where people are very much aware of the allegations against him. I don't believe that nobody on her team thought to point out it was a pretty bad angle for Katy to take, so the fact she committed to it has led to a not-undeserved backlash. Adding insult to injury is that the music was largely very faceless and without the personality Katy never usually lacked.

That said, death threats are never okay, and people take it too far. Again, she's become the butt of the joke online, and whilst I think she's brought some of the negativity on herself, people don't know when to stop and for some reason, it feels like Katy is fair game.

I've not seen the setlist for the tour, nor any footage from it, as I'm attending it myself later in the year and want to remain spoiler-free, so I can't comment on that aspect and can't say whether this is yet another case of Katy being an easy target, but the space mission definitely feels like an example of Katy becoming a laughing stock for some. The mission as a whole is a little ludicrous with how short it was (and how much money it must have cost for such a short trip to go ahead), but it didn't feel like a lot of the jokes were laughing with Katy, but at her.

I don't think it's fair to comment on her intelligence level, we don't know her in that way, but I find some of the discourse quite tedious whilst also knowing she brought much of the recent backlash on herself.

I never even knew about her cut hair or disliked her from Dr. Luke. I'm not saying you said that but I'm just saying from my POV.

Incase you or anyone is interested to read my 143 review I've uploaded it on AOTY- I may post it here to.

5 minutes ago, Sour Candy said:

If you take away bits and pieces from every show on planet, you can make it seem like "what were they thinking"... I mean Lady Gaga had her Enigma trainwreck which is actually a great show it you see it in full but it has some questionable parts like the wig (which is ICONIC already lol) and the dialogue with Enigma her digital "alter ego". I myself see it as the starting point of what Mayhem become where the duality is present, in a form of "bad" and "good". But, regardless, the show is regarded as a low-point of her career by fans today.

Then back to Katy, Witness didn't really kill her career imo. She had a big hit with Feels in the UK and Never Really Over reached top 20 in the US. What did hurt her though is the very narrow comfort zone she has been staying since day 1. Even Miley Cyrus has been able to try stuff and explore things, not always succeeding but still exploring. I think Katy doesn't really properly care about being a pop star. She is more like celebrity and entertainer type of person in my books.

Her hits have received brilliant number of streams so I don't know if people are really hating her. At least they are still curious and eager to revisit her music. Last Friday Night is #111 on global Spotify as we speak. But after a certain point it is always difficult to sell NEW music to people and the gigantic mess with Dr. Luke didn't help (nor did the uninspired choices she has made).

That said, the European leg of the tour is almost sold out and she'll do just fine with it.

So, I don't know, she is a very interesting case study of pop culture right now.

Global Spotify streams don't really matter anymore, the top songs there are more stagnant then the Billboard charts.

Obviously they matter - they show that artists still have their audiences. Rihanna hasn't released much in years but is constantly on the radar streaming-wise. Her next album will be an explosion if it ever comes out (same with Frank Ocean, another star whose old music is streaming super well).

1 hour ago, Sour Candy said:

Obviously they matter - they show that artists still have their audiences. Rihanna hasn't released much in years but is constantly on the radar streaming-wise. Her next album will be an explosion if it ever comes out (same with Frank Ocean, another star whose old music is streaming super well).

Katy Perry is still overall a successful artist (and she's definitely had many hits) but seeing the peak she hit its sad to see her not live up to half of that.

The amount of hyperbolic energy in the OP... 🙈

Every single comment I've seen littered in supposed disillusionment about the Lifetimes Tour (and anything Katy does in general) clearly comes from people desperate to add to the pile-on circles that are, quite frankly, just becoming embarrassing and tiresome to read. Do people really have nothing better to do with their time than trying to seek - at this point - ill-informed opine validation and 'comfort' on social media that are at this point seriously lacking any critical thought whatsoever, becoming so wrapped up in a constant swarm of vitriol and hatred for one woman no matter what she does?

The fact of the matter is, no matter how people try to spin things to fit their narrative, the Lifetimes Tour is going to be a success for Katy. Whether or not she actually makes it to the end of the tour given the fragile mental and physical state she appears to be in is a different conversation but dates are sold out. People are going to the tour because they are invested in Katy as an artist. Because they are invested in her back-catalogue. Because they want to see somebody they've idolised for however long perform live.

Why does it matter to people who clearly aren't going to attend the shows what she's wearing? What choreography she's doing? What visual effects the tour has? What set pieces there are? Nobody critiquing all of this wants to take a step back, bite their tongue and be objective about the fact that there is a narrative reason for things that are happening or accept the fact that these are all components that have created a Katy Perry tour in the past; something nobody has taken issue with until it's deemed socially acceptable to because if you appear on the internet as somebody who's prepared to bash Katy, justified or not, then you must be the epitome of a high flyer in life.

In answer to the OP: for a while, no, she wasn't a victim. And while there are absolutely better ways the backlash to some of the decisions Katy and her team made at the beginning of this era could have been handled by them, everything that has happened since and the way people have behaved and continue to online, she has become a victim.

The attitude from people who are chronically online and ultimately miserable in this day of 'my opinion is this and it can't exist itself without finding a group of people to echo that sentiment in its entirety which means it must be the only correct opinion' is tiring. People are so wrapped up in a bubble of wanting to be correct, wanting to feel validated in their views, trying to type their way to some sort of social and moral justice that they inadvertently become the perpetrators by constantly trying to shout the loudest, losing any means of sensibility and nuance in the argument against her and things she has done that may have brought her character into question in the first place.

How can you stand firmly on any supposed moral high ground and watch what's happening to this woman and think you are on the right side of things when she is receiving death threats, her daughter is being dragged into all of this, every single thing she does is being criticised no matter what when, ultimately, most of what she is being criticised for in the past few weeks boils down to nothing more than personal taste or interest in who she is as an artist and what her brand is and has been all along? It's ridiculous.

18 minutes ago, Calum said:

The amount of hyperbolic energy in the OP... 🙈

Every single comment I've seen littered in supposed disillusionment about the Lifetimes Tour (and anything Katy does in general) clearly comes from people desperate to add to the pile-on circles that are, quite frankly, just becoming embarrassing and tiresome to read. Do people really have nothing better to do with their time than trying to seek - at this point - ill-informed opine validation and 'comfort' on social media that are at this point seriously lacking any critical thought whatsoever, becoming so wrapped up in a constant swarm of vitriol and hatred for one woman no matter what she does?

The fact of the matter is, no matter how people try to spin things to fit their narrative, the Lifetimes Tour is going to be a success for Katy. Whether or not she actually makes it to the end of the tour given the fragile mental and physical state she appears to be in is a different conversation but dates are sold out. People are going to the tour because they are invested in Katy as an artist. Because they are invested in her back-catalogue. Because they want to see somebody they've idolised for however long perform live.

Why does it matter to people who clearly aren't going to attend the shows what she's wearing? What choreography she's doing? What visual effects the tour has? What set pieces there are? Nobody critiquing all of this wants to take a step back, bite their tongue and be objective about the fact that there is a narrative reason for things that are happening or accept the fact that these are all components that have created a Katy Perry tour in the past; something nobody has taken issue with until it's deemed socially acceptable to because if you appear on the internet as somebody who's prepared to bash Katy, justified or not, then you must be the epitome of a high flyer in life.

In answer to the OP: for a while, no, she wasn't a victim. And while there are absolutely better ways the backlash to some of the decisions Katy and her team made at the beginning of this era could have been handled by them, everything that has happened since and the way people have behaved and continue to online, she has become a victim.

The attitude from people who are chronically online and ultimately miserable in this day of 'my opinion is this and it can't exist itself without finding a group of people to echo that sentiment in its entirety which means it must be the only correct opinion' is tiring. People are so wrapped up in a bubble of wanting to be correct, wanting to feel validated in their views, trying to type their way to some sort of social and moral justice that they inadvertently become the perpetrators by constantly trying to shout the loudest, losing any means of sensibility and nuance in the argument against her and things she has done that may have brought her character into question in the first place.

How can you stand firmly on any supposed moral high ground and watch what's happening to this woman and think you are on the right side of things when she is receiving death threats, her daughter is being dragged into all of this, every single thing she does is being criticised no matter what when, ultimately, most of what she is being criticised for in the past few weeks boils down to nothing more than personal taste or interest in who she is as an artist and what her brand is and has been all along? It's ridiculous.

I said that I don't support the really bad things (such as death threats) being made at Katy, but just because she's getting death threats doesn't mean that I can't speak about her choreography.

The reason why I made this (believe it or not) was not because I had hate for Katy; I thought the situation was incredibly funny, and the low quality of things was amusing for a quick write-up, which I like to do.

Believe me, if Katy made something truly amazing, then I would write about it, but come on? This is on a new level of bad.

I'm not going to hate you or anyone for liking '143' (even though I don't). I actually like a lot of Katy's music, but she can't be defended here. Look at the worse things she's done with the nuns and Justin Bieber... This wasn't meant to be a serious post, but in all seriousness, she's not the greatest person anyway; it's not like I'm taking harmless jokes from a person with a clean record.

this was also the first time I've ever spoken about the tours and about the 2nd time I've criticised '143' publicly, it's not like I constantly aim for the same person.

"Look at the worse things she's done with the nuns"

This is where it - for anybody who is using this as ammunition to further call Katy's character into question - completely falls apart and becomes quite laughable. Has anybody bothered to read what actually happened or do we just run with the buzzwords that 'Katy killed a nun' and suddenly denounce her without fact-checking? It's not too far-fetched to say trying to reason with those invested so deeply in hating on her is like trying to reason with MAGA cultists. The nun in question was 89 (!) years of age and the legal proceedings were valid. Useful article here to summarise what happened excluding misconstrued, unchecked statements on social media.

I'm not having a go at you or any of your opinions/musings here Mellope, for the record. My post was commentary on the criticisms more broadly.

3 minutes ago, Calum said:

"Look at the worse things she's done with the nuns"

This is where anybody who is using this as ammunition to further call Katy's character into question completely falls apart and becomes quite laughable. Has anybody bothered to read what actually happened or do we just run with the buzzwords that 'Katy killed a nun' and suddenly denounce her without fact-checking? It's not too far-fetched to say trying to reason with those invested so deeply in hating on her is like trying to reason with MAGA cultists. The nun in question was 89 (!) years of age and the legal proceedings were valid. Useful article here to summarise what happened excluding misconstrued, unchecked statements on social media.

I'm not having a go at you or any of your opinions/musings here Mellope, for the record. My post was commentary on the criticisms more broadly.

I'm not saying she killed the nun at all, I think that was rubbish. She did however stress others in the process of buying the place and thanks to her silly decisions led another women to file bankruptcy.

Edited May 3May 3 by Mellope

The “fall” of Katy is always really interesting to analyse and look at, especially from someone who stans the charts.

I feel like the Dr Luke thing is still not really necessarily common knowledge; unless you’re on Stan Twitter or a chart forum site like Buzzjack, you wouldn’t necessarily know it as common knowledge. It’s not like the recent trip to space, which was on pretty much every panel show and newspaper globally.

Regarding the working with Dr Luke, it was a bad move, and someone like Katy, who's a household name and still a talking point, just wouldn’t get away with it the way newer female artists would. Having said that, could that have been overseen if the material of 143 was actually good?

Before 143 dropped, it did actually seem like there was goodwill towards her, and it did seem like there was genuine hype for new music too what soon just faded when Dr Luke was announced to be involved with the project. I won’t comment too much on her intellectual level here but surely she knew there’d be backlash from that and people would be asking questions and wanting answers. It’s frustrating at times because it does feel like anytime there’s an ounce of goodwill towards her or when she seems to be in a good position she does something what derails it all. I suppose you could blame streaming support; it’s hard to judge just how well the 143 era could’ve done, for example, had she had stronger playlist support.

However, with Katy, I think her actual music itself has severely gone downhill. All artists have to fight to remain eternally relevant, and we’ve seen it’s tougher for females, especially in pop music! Katy debuted and also peaked at a time when her peers were also very strong, and we’ve seen the likes of Taylor, Beyoncé (who I’m not the biggest fan of at all, but I can’t deny she’s a performance powerhouse and very versatile), and Gaga all show far more artistry and versatility to get to where they want to be. Gaga is an interesting one because as Katy was thriving with Prism back in 2013 Gaga was in a position with the public that wasn’t the best but she was able to adapt to her musical talents and showcase multiple different strokes to her what made her able to comeback successfully.

With Katy, she isn’t talented in the vocal stakes to strip things back and show her raw talent, and her performance skills are questionable too (in short, she just didn’t really reinvent or show a different side to her successfully to come back).

She’ll always be a relevant touring act but more in the legacy act lane. I genuinely don’t see her as a chart star anymore. I think Smile was the decider to that, but after Witness, Smile and now 143 went the way they did. No matter who she works with, I just don’t think she can score another solo hit again!

Edited May 3May 3 by Jordanlee1402

20 minutes ago, Jordanlee1402 said:

The “fall” of Katy is always really interesting to analyse and look at, especially from someone who stans the charts.

I feel like the Dr Luke thing is still not really necessarily common knowledge; unless you’re on Stan Twitter or a chart forum site like Buzzjack, you wouldn’t necessarily know it as common knowledge. It’s not like the recent trip to space, which was on pretty much every panel show and newspaper globally.

Regarding the working with Dr Luke, it was a bad move, and someone like Katy, who's a household name and still a talking point, just wouldn’t get away with it the way newer female artists would. Having said that, could that have been overseen if the material of 143 was actually good?

Before 143 dropped, it did actually seem like there was goodwill towards her, and it did seem like there was genuine hype for new music too what soon just faded when Dr Luke was announced to be involved with the project. I won’t comment too much on her intellectual level here but surely she knew there’d be backlash from that and people would be asking questions and wanting answers. It’s frustrating at times because it does feel like anytime there’s an ounce of goodwill towards her or when she seems to be in a good position she does something what derails it all. I suppose you could blame streaming support; it’s hard to judge just how well the 143 era could’ve done, for example, had she had stronger playlist support.

However, with Katy, I think her actual music itself has severely gone downhill. All artists have to fight to remain eternally relevant, and we’ve seen it’s tougher for females, especially in pop music! Katy debuted and also peaked at a time when her peers were also very strong, and we’ve seen the likes of Taylor, Beyoncé (who I’m not the biggest fan of at all, but I can’t deny she’s a performance powerhouse and very versatile), and Gaga all show far more artistry and versatility to get to where they want to be. Gaga is an interesting one because as Katy was thriving with Prism back in 2013 Gaga was in a position with the public that wasn’t the best but she was able to adapt to her musical talents and showcase multiple different strokes to her what made her able to comeback successfully.

With Katy, she isn’t talented in the vocal stakes to strip things back and show her raw talent, and her performance skills are questionable too (in short, she just didn’t really reinvent or show a different side to her successfully to come back).

She’ll always be a relevant touring act but more in the legacy act lane. I genuinely don’t see her as a chart star anymore. I think Smile was the decider to that, but after Witness, Smile and now 143 went the way they did. No matter who she works with, I just don’t think she can score another solo hit again!

Haven't read everything yet but I would like to correct you, I'm not a "Stan of the charts" I just review the new entry's and a lot of the time I don't like them.

It's a interest, I am not a stan.

Or are you talking about you?

Edited May 3May 3 by Mellope

37 minutes ago, Mellope said:

Haven't read everything yet but I would like to correct you, I'm not a "Stan of the charts" I just review the new entry's and a lot of the time I don't like them.

It's a interest, I am not a stan.

Or are you talking about you?

I’d like to correct you here and say that I’m not talking about you. The full post was about my own thoughts nobody else’s.

Edited May 3May 3 by Jordanlee1402

20 minutes ago, Jordanlee1402 said:

I’d like to correct you here and say that I’m not talking about you. The full post was about my own thoughts nobody else’s.

Thanks for clarifying.