Sunday at 00:282 days 3 hours ago, Dalek Jon said:Anyone else fed up with remixes only being about three minutes long these days? Or "extended" remixes clocking in at no longer then three and a half minutes? That's if we get any remixes at all!What happened to remixes at least seven minutes in length? You know, ones that are easy to mix into a set (that I like to do) because they have nice long lead ins and outs.It's something related with the streaming time...
Sunday at 02:152 days 1 hour ago, Babyboy said:t's something related with the streaming time...5 hours ago, Dalek Jon said:Anyone else fed up with remixes only being about three minutes long these days? Or "extended" remixes clocking in at no longer then three and a half minutes? That's if we get any remixes at all!What happened to remixes at least seven minutes in length? You know, ones that are easy to mix into a set (that I like to do) because they have nice long lead ins and outs.Yep, it is because of streaming. Streaming has basically reduced people's attention spams and the shorter a song is, the better change it has of being a hit. Plus, it allows for easier 'repeat plays'. It's f***ing sad because it is anti-art but that's the 'free market' capitalism we live in working... it's vile. This remix is definitely pointless. She would be wise to move on to a new song asap.
Sunday at 17:261 day I thought it might have been something to do with the stupid Spotify generation.
Sunday at 20:401 day 3 hours ago, Dalek Jon said:I thought it might have been something to do with the stupid Spotify generation.yeah sadly.. it is also artists' own fault who would rather do a 2min song to get 0,000001 british pounds for a stream, than make actual music (since they are barely being paid for it anyway!). At one point, Nicki Minaj and Ice Spice were releasing songs - as singles! - that we no more than 1;45mins long. SINGLES! It's wild...
