February 24, 200817 yr We didn't deserve to win when we only played good football for the last 15mins. :(
February 24, 200817 yr Spurs were the deserving winners - had the best oppotunites and were the best side. I've gotta say though, I thought Chelsea were hard done by at the very end when they were through on goal and the whistle was blown. Saying that however, they hit the post from that chance!
February 24, 200817 yr Well Done Spurs. The best side on the day won. Chelsea lost due to selecting the English duo of Lampard & Terry who clearly were not fully match fit. I'm sure Alex & Ballack would have been far more effective. Whilst what was the point of playing Anelka on the wing? = Bizarre.
February 24, 200817 yr Spurs were the deserving winners - had the best oppotunites and were the best side. I've gotta say though, I thought Chelsea were hard done by at the very end when they were through on goal and the whistle was blown. Saying that however, they hit the post from that chance! no they weren't, they had nearly 130 minutes to score, and the referee can blow when he wants. Just throwing thier toys out of the pram as usual Gallas style ^_^
February 24, 200817 yr :dance: :cheer: :cheer: :dance: :w00t: :w00t: :dance: :yahoo: :cheer: Glory Glory Tottenham Hotspurs & The Spurs go marching on. Ramos is the Cup king. Now for the UEFA Cup. :P Spurs so deserved this win. :blink: Outplayed them at the start and towards the end. There's only One Woodgate & Ramos. :D
February 24, 200817 yr Well Done Spurs. The best side on the day won. Chelsea lost due to selecting the English duo of Lampard & Terry who clearly were not fully match fit. I'm sure Alex & Ballack would have been far more effective. Whilst what was the point of playing Anelka on the wing? = Bizarre. I disagree on the Anelka point. He's played there very effectively in the same system for Bolton.
February 24, 200817 yr no they weren't, they had nearly 130 minutes to score, and the referee can blow when he wants. Just throwing thier toys out of the pram as usual Gallas style ^_^ I agree time was over, but refs have to be consistent. There was a period in time where he let play go WAY over the time allowed, yet in contrast to that he didn't. You could say he was just making things more even which is all very well but refs have to be consistent, or, they should be at least.
February 24, 200817 yr good game, im a spurs fan and had 5 pints of stella resting on this :D Great day to be a Tottenham fan :cool:
February 24, 200817 yr Spurs were the deserving winners - had the best oppotunites and were the best side. I've gotta say though, I thought Chelsea were hard done by at the very end when they were through on goal and the whistle was blown. Saying that however, they hit the post from that chance! We were a victim of that against Man Utd, cost us 2 points The ref said 3 mins of injury time and Utd scored after 3 mins and 14 secs so it is fair that it was evened out today
February 24, 200817 yr Author We were a victim of that against Man Utd, cost us 2 points The ref said 3 mins of injury time and Utd scored after 3 mins and 14 secs so it is fair that it was evened out today In fairness though, the corner was awarded before the 3 minutes was up :P
February 24, 200817 yr Juande Ramos Blue and White Army!!!!!!! :yahoo: :yahoo: :yahoo: Bring on the uefa cup :P
February 24, 200817 yr Well done to Tottenham, i really didn't care who won but from what i saw you deserved it ^_^
February 25, 200817 yr Author I agree time was over, but refs have to be consistent. There was a period in time where he let play go WAY over the time allowed, yet in contrast to that he didn't. You could say he was just making things more even which is all very well but refs have to be consistent, or, they should be at least. For gods sake does it really matter? Kalou hit the bar with the shot anyway :mellow: Had he scored, i would see your argument. Edited February 25, 200817 yr by JamesP
February 25, 200817 yr For gods sake does it really matter? Kalou hit the bar with the shot anyway :mellow: Had he scored, i would see your argument. I wouldn't, if Drogba wasn't waggling fingers at Tainio even though the ref was dealing with him, wasting his own team's time then that time could have allowed the ball to creep in the net from a rebound
February 25, 200817 yr To make it fair for everyone so that there is no inconsistencies they should bring in the basketball / american football thing where the klaxon goes EXACTLY at the point that the injury time has finished and injury time blowing is out of the hands of the referees, if there is 3 mins of injury time allotted then it should end at exactly 93 mins and if there is a good move going or a corner or whatever then tough titties, the teams have had 90 odd mins to have a good move, time is up, game over
February 25, 200817 yr but it's a MINIMUM of x added minutes of time. What if there's an injury, players would just abuse it, rolling around after 90 minutes, covering their faces so the physio has to come on, until a klaxon or whatever went.
February 25, 200817 yr It's fine as it is. It is a minimum and ref's can play as long as they see fit...
February 25, 200817 yr And I bet all the pillocks with the posh seats don't return until the hour mark because lunch is soooo much more important :angry: Like I said a couple weeks or so ago, I had VIP treatment for the Scotland EC qualifiers vs Ukraine and Italy, and I think Saskia and myself were getting odd looks 'cos we were going out in time for the start of the second half.
February 25, 200817 yr For gods sake does it really matter? Kalou hit the bar with the shot anyway :mellow: Had he scored, i would see your argument. It doesn't matter really but it should just be noted. I thought the ref had a really good game yesterday anyway and I was pleased Spurs won. I did secretly want them to win on penalties though. :lol: :P
Create an account or sign in to comment