May 23, 200916 yr But seriously Chris you have to be the thickest person that has ever posted on here you contradict reality so much You would vote for the BNP even though they would deport your wife, you would drink champagne when Cameron gets elected even though your benefits would be in serious danger, it doesn't add up, think things through man before you post
May 23, 200916 yr God, and you missus is from the Phillipines as well.... Just who the fukk do you think the BNP would be sending on the first transports out of the country you fukkin' halfwit....? <_< :rofl: yet again crazy chris lives upto his name, shooting himself in the foot yet again...ffs how does he stand up? theres nowt but stumps left! :lol:
May 23, 200916 yr cameron wont want an election atm...the tories have out pigged themselves regarding mp's expenses with as usual the tories being the biggest offenders. that has damaged boy camerons slim chances.
May 23, 200916 yr cameron wont want an election atm...the tories have out pigged themselves regarding mp's expenses with as usual the tories being the biggest offenders. that has damaged boy camerons slim chances. It won't be the thieving that is going to cost Labour though it will be the economy, come election time all this expenses stuff will have been forgotten but the economy/recession/stealth taxes/banking crisis/record public borrowing and so on won't be forgotten If the expenses thing was the deciding factor I would agree but Labour's mismanagement of the economy means they are toast
May 23, 200916 yr But seriously Chris you have to be the thickest person that has ever posted on here you contradict reality so much You would vote for the BNP even though they would deport your wife, you would drink champagne when Cameron gets elected even though your benefits would be in serious danger, it doesn't add up, think things through man before you post Their scheme would be VOLUNTARY though. They've never said they'll force all non-whites to leave. If they did there'd hardly be anyone left in places like here in East London, Bradford etc.
May 23, 200916 yr Are you just a complete idiot....? The BNP are scum, simple as... You just dont seem to realise who these people actually are... Well, let me enlighten you.. The BNP are basically a rebranding of the neo-Nazi National Front... They're no more "legitimate" than Combat 18, Al Moujharoun or Abu Hamza..... And it's about time they were treated in the same way, ie, to be declared an ILLEGAL organisation... You think just because they wear suits instead of drainpipe trousers, white t-shirts and bovver boots that this somehow makes these c.unts respectable....? Like hell.... They're maggots, thugs, nasty pieces of work and frankly they want shooting.... Give me a gun and I'll gladly put one between Nick Griffin's eyes...... God, and you missus is from the Phillipines as well.... Just who the fukk do you think the BNP would be sending on the first transports out of the country you fukkin' halfwit....? <_< You can't alter the fact that they're a LEGITIMATE POLITICAL PARTY, whatever their views and policies. I'm not saying I support them but I think ALL immigration should be stopped. We've got families from Lithuania in our street, 10 or 12 to a house. They've just come, no job or anything and get Council houses yet I was born here and could never get one. :angry: Why, why, why are we letting them all in? Edited May 23, 200916 yr by Crazy Chris
May 23, 200916 yr Their scheme would be VOLUNTARY though. They've never said they'll force all non-whites to leave. If they did there'd hardly be anyone left in places like here in East London, Bradford etc. That's what they say though They are just trying to put on a "moderate" public face but if they got into any sort of position of power every non white face would be leaving the country whether they like it or not, these guys are extremists Of course they won't say enforced repatriation in their manifesto, they would be banned as a political party if they did
May 23, 200916 yr You can't alter the fact that they're a LEGITIMATE POLITICAL PARTY, whatever their views and policies. I'm not saying I support them but I think ALL immigration should be stopped. We've got families from Lithuania in our street, 10 or 12 to a house. They've just come, no job or anything and get Council houses yet I was born here and could never get one. :angry: Why, why, why are we letting them all in? Because Lithuania's in the EU you prat...... :lol: We could no more stop them coming over than they could stop you or I going to Lithuania. Or France. Or Germany. Or Sweden...... And, personally, I believe in the freedom of movement act... It's called "democracy" Chris and we signed up to it, it benefits us as much as it does anyone else in EU...... Are you just completely stupid or completely uninformed about all this stuff.....? Considering you consistently support the "right" for stupid, brainless teenage sluts to get pregnant by multiple unknown males, and take council homes, frankly, your argument's a bit rich....
May 23, 200916 yr That's what they say though They are just trying to put on a "moderate" public face but if they got into any sort of position of power every non white face would be leaving the country whether they like it or not, these guys are extremists Of course they won't say enforced repatriation in their manifesto, they would be banned as a political party if they did EXACTLY.... I mean, Hitler and the Nazis didn't exactly put "we pledge to exterminate every single Jew in Europe" in their manifesto did they....? I think anyone with any sense knows exactly what the BNP would do if they got into power.... Which is why they should be banned in my view... But the mainstream parties are simply too scared to ban them..... It's easy to pick targets like Islamic extremists or animal rights activists and call them dangers to national security, but the facts are, the likes of the BNP have inspired terrorism, hatred and violence through their actions and their rhetoric..... I mean, FFS, Oswald bloody Mosely was put in prison for doing less than Griffin has done....
May 23, 200916 yr We could do with the RBS and BOS out of westminsters hands, they could never run anything properly [Railtrack and British Leyland anyone?] They'd get a good chunk of a yes vote from anti-english c**ts but with this recession, as long as Salmond stays in favour it's a shoe in. Railtrack wasn't in Westminster hands. It was a private company which did such a dreadful job it had to be rescued by the government and renamed Network Rail. Since then, things have improved.
May 23, 200916 yr Railtrack wasn't in Westminster hands. It was a private company which did such a dreadful job it had to be rescued by the government and renamed Network Rail. Since then, things have improved. Only marginally though, the companies themselves are still private, and some of them are still an utter disgrace... I think that privatising rail was a huge mistake, I'm pretty much firmly of the belief that public transport should be publically owned and managed....
May 23, 200916 yr Only marginally though, the companies themselves are still private, and some of them are still an utter disgrace... I think that privatising rail was a huge mistake, I'm pretty much firmly of the belief that public transport should be publically owned and managed.... The companies running the trains are indeed still in private hands but the company that owns the track (Network Rail) isn't. As for privatisation, it was one of the worst things Major's government did. And, let's face it, there's a lot of competition.
May 23, 200916 yr A general election now would be a knee jerk reaction to the recession and the expenses shambles. The parties don't seem to have a range of detailed manifesto policies to present to the public for their consideration. IMHO every MP of every hue is distrusted. It's a moment for all parties to stop blaming each other and realise they made the mess and together they have to make reforms to win back some measure of public trust. From there they can start redefining their individual party policies ready for a proper general election. The regional parties have not been seen to be as "dirty" as the mainstream ones and they would probably clean up in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland now if a general election is called, creating even more tension with whichever party/parties win at Westminster. They will undoubtedly use the opportunity to press for more control of their own affairs. For example, Alex Salmond might take the gamble of promising to use the Scottish Executive's right to reduce income tax by anything up to 3p in the pound. Can you imagine the discontent in the other nations if they were paying more than the Scots and the Barnett formula was still in place? Westminster are over a barrel in regard to Scotland's finances. David Cameron might take the risk of tampering with the formula but he'd find his party emasculated in Holyrood. Even mighty Labour are scared to do anything for the same reason. It depends how important the United Kingdom is to the mainstream parties. Allowing an independent Scotland to sink or swim would solve their headache but it's the 'nuclear' option. No-one wants to push the button.
May 23, 200916 yr Yes there should be a general election Yes I am biased because I know that Tories will win by a majority of 150+ if there was an election tomorrow but even that aside there are hundreds of crooks and spivs sitting in the house who have no right to be there after all the stealing they have done so the best thing to do is call a general election and get new MP's in who will be able to give politics a fresh start I wouldn’t be too sure if I were you… The landslide in 1997 came off the back of positive vibes with people thinking things were going to change for the better. I don’t see or feel any perception of renewed faith behind the Conservatives to suggest there is going to be a seismic swing to them! It seemed somewhat unlikely that the Tories would hold on in 1992 after the poll tax debacle and another recession following on from the financially troubled 80’s. When it comes to ballot day I think the old adage better the devil you know will stifle the swing. In honestly think the next general election will be very tight and locally very volatile. Jury candidates standing against MP’s who claimed frivolous expenses that haven’t been deselected or the common decency to resign could have a large bearing on the outcome, I believe we will see an unprecedented number of independents elected. New Labour support will crumble in the traditional heartlands to fringe parties rather than the Tories, while it’s likely to hold up much better in the marginal seats the Tories need to win. The most likely outcome is a hung parliament or a very small single digit majority for either Conservatives or Labour. The days of big government are numbered for the first time since the 70’s imo and it's about time! Edited May 23, 200916 yr by Ethan.
May 23, 200916 yr Because Lithuania's in the EU you prat...... :lol: We could no more stop them coming over than they could stop you or I going to Lithuania. Or France. Or Germany. Or Sweden...... And, personally, I believe in the freedom of movement act... It's called "democracy" Chris and we signed up to it, it benefits us as much as it does anyone else in EU...... Are you just completely stupid or completely uninformed about all this stuff.....? Considering you consistently support the "right" for stupid, brainless teenage sluts to get pregnant by multiple unknown males, and take council homes, frankly, your argument's a bit rich.... How does it benefit us to have lots of Lithuanians coming or indeed lots from any European country and them claim benefits and get priority for council housing when they've never paid a penny in? Please tell me how the UK benefits cos I sure as hell can't see it.
May 23, 200916 yr The most likely outcome is a hung parliament or a very small single digit majority for either Conservatives or Labour. The days of big government are numbered for the first time since the 70’s imo and it's about time! You think with the Tories 20 points ahead consistently that the most likely outcome is a hung parliament or slim majority? No, big Tory majority on the cards. Edited May 23, 200916 yr by Crazy Chris
May 23, 200916 yr How does it benefit us to have lots of Lithuanians coming or indeed lots from any European country and them claim benefits and get priority for council housing when they've never paid a penny in? Please tell me how the UK benefits cos I sure as hell can't see it. At least those people have the get up and go to move to a different country to look for work as opposed to our native abhorrently lazy feral benefits underclass who don't know what work is. :rolleyes:
May 23, 200916 yr How does it benefit us to have lots of Lithuanians coming or indeed lots from any European country and them claim benefits and get priority for council housing when they've never paid a penny in? Please tell me how the UK benefits cos I sure as hell can't see it. Yeh a bit like people born in the UK who claim benefits, and who haven't paid anything into the system, now that would never happen, would it now.
May 23, 200916 yr You think with the Tories 20 points ahead consistently that the most likely outcome is a hung parliament or slim majority? No, big Tory majority on the cards. It will melt away as soon as the campaigning begins! :)
May 24, 200916 yr Their scheme would be VOLUNTARY though. They've never said they'll force all non-whites to leave. If they did there'd hardly be anyone left in places like here in East London, Bradford etc. .... and if i was married to you id jump at the opportunity to clear off! :lol: You can't alter the fact that they're a LEGITIMATE POLITICAL PARTY, whatever their views and policies. I'm not saying I support them but I think ALL immigration should be stopped. We've got families from Lithuania in our street, 10 or 12 to a house. They've just come, no job or anything and get Council houses yet I was born here and could never get one. :angry: Why, why, why are we letting them all in? i dont believe this post...... its so WRONG on every level, are you a script writer for 'the royle family'? you aspire to be given a council house?.... FCUKIN GET OFF YER ARSE AND WORK :angry: I wouldn’t be too sure if I were you… The landslide in 1997 came off the back of positive vibes with people thinking things were going to change for the better. I don’t see or feel any perception of renewed faith behind the Conservatives to suggest there is going to be a seismic swing to them! EXACTLY! How does it benefit us to have lots of Lithuanians coming or indeed lots from any European country and them claim benefits and get priority for council housing when they've never paid a penny in? Please tell me how the UK benefits cos I sure as hell can't see it. i was going to reply to this...but brian already has! Yeh a bit like people born in the UK who claim benefits, and who haven't paid anything into the system, now that would never happen, would it now. as a taxpayer i resent paying my taxes to ANYBODY to scrounge their way through life. it matters NOT who they are or where they come from... yes ive moaned about migrants before milking our system, and i will again...but coming from someone who has worked for 2 years out of the last 30 is franlky disgusting. chris, you are the biggest hypocrit ive ever seen online, you shoot yourself in the foot time and time again on a daily basis.
Create an account or sign in to comment