According to today's Sun it's an "alleged serious sexual offence" but they can't reveal any more as they've been threatened with legal action if they do. So lock him up for good now then. That's hardly minor is it? Far far worse than an altercation with a workmate. So much for them having been "rehabilitated" then. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

Anyone can accuse anyone of a sex offence .... as long as the magic word 'alleged' is used. I think if you did a poll of all Sun staff for their favourite and most useful word ... it would be 'alleged'.

 

Norma

Anyone can accuse anyone of a sex offence .... as long as the magic word 'alleged' is used. I think if you did a poll of all Sun staff for their favourite and most useful word ... it would be 'alleged'.

 

Norma

 

Agreed, if Rupert Murdoch Inc had their way they would bring back the death penalty ..... and televise it via a Reality TV show where 12 criminals on death row battle on prime time weekend ITV Sky for the right of survival where the winner gets a pardon & freedom and the other 11 get put to death, one a week.

 

They'd probably get Simon Cowell to run the show and call it ..........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can guess the punchline ...........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Ex-Factor!

I'd bring back the death penalty tomorrow and start with Thompson and Venables. I'm sure there'd be no shortage of volunteers to be hangman. I'd certainly gladly do it. :)

 

Edited March 6, 201016 yr by Victor Meldrew

I'd bring back the death penalty tomorrow and start with Thompson and Venables. I'm sure there'd be no shortage of volunteers to be hangman. I'd certainly gladly do it. :)

You're volunteering to do some work :o

 

Again, who cares how many volunteers there would be? It's totally irrelevant. we don't have the death penalty - now live with it. Calling for the restoration of the death penalty is as futile as calling for the abolition of Thursdays.

So, what does that moronic non sequitur contribution have to do with anything? You don't answer reason and reply to everything with gut feeling driven or 'OTHER MORONIC SUN READERS AGREE WITH ME SO IT MUST BE TRUE'-style responses.

 

In any case, why even mention Thompson? You may possibly have grounds with Venables, depending on how this recall turns out (not that I agree with the death penalty in any case, a ridiculous and barbaric punishment which merely wastes human worth in mindless pursuit of the populist salve of atavistic retribution), but what the hell would you gain from executing someone who's unquestionably been reformed? :/

It's still precisely because of the ignorant attitude you've displayed - i.e. pronounce him guilty of an unknown offence without the bother of a trial - that the press cannot reveal details. There is too high a risk that members of a jury in any trial which may result will declare him guilty simply because of who he is.

 

 

It amazes me how you continue to defend these two, both here and elsewhere. Oh you're not alone but very much in the minority. Just go on the Sun website or read the very long DS thread. People calling for them to be strung up from lamp-posts and volunteering to do it. Why is there so much hatred for these two? Maybe because they didn't serve long enough inside in the first place for killing a 2 year-old child. I'm far from alone in my feelings of hatred towards them.

Edited March 6, 201016 yr by Victor Meldrew

So, what does that moronic non sequitur contribution have to do with anything? You don't answer reason and reply to everything with gut feeling driven or 'OTHER MORONIC SUN READERS AGREE WITH ME SO IT MUST BE TRUE'-style responses.

 

In any case, why even mention Thompson? You may possibly have grounds with Venables, depending on how this recall turns out (not that I agree with the death penalty in any case, a ridiculous and barbaric punishment which merely wastes human worth in mindless pursuit of the populist salve of atavistic retribution), but what the hell would you gain from executing someone who's unquestionably been reformed? :/

 

 

Oh I give up. :rolleyes: He murdered a 2 year-old boy. Carry on defending them if you like.

Edited March 6, 201016 yr by Victor Meldrew

You're volunteering to do some work :o

 

Again, who cares how many volunteers there would be? It's totally irrelevant. we don't have the death penalty - now live with it. Calling for the restoration of the death penalty is as futile as calling for the abolition of Thursdays.

 

LOL good one :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

 

 

It amazes me how you continue to defend these two, both here and elsewhere. Oh you're not alone but very much in the minority. Just go on the Sun website or read the very long DS thread. People calling for them to be strung up from lamp-posts and volunteering to do it. Why is there so much hatred for these two? Maybe because they didn't serve long enough inside in the first place for killing a 2 year-old child. I'm far from alone in my feelings of hatred towards them.

 

If every Sun readers IQ was tested I would be surprised if 1% even made 100, the majority would be lucky to make double digits, they just nod sheep style at whatever the Sun editor says

It amazes me how you continue to defend these two, both here and elsewhere. Oh you're not alone but very much in the minority. Just go on the Sun website or read the very long DS thread. People calling for them to be strung up from lamp-posts and volunteering to do it. Why is there so much hatred for these two? Maybe because they didn't serve long enough inside in the first place for killing a 2 year-old child. I'm far from alone in my feelings of hatred towards them.

:rolleyes:

 

You don't answer reason and reply to everything with gut feeling driven or 'OTHER MORONIC SUN READERS AGREE WITH ME SO IT MUST BE TRUE'-style responses.

Oh I give up. He murdered a 2 year-old boy. Carry on defending them if you like.

I am not DEFENDING their actions! I've asked you COUNTLESS times within this thread what the point is in killing a reformed character (or even a criminal for that matter - these people can be put to use you know :/)?

If every Sun readers IQ was tested I would be surprised if 1% even made 100, the majority would be lucky to make double digits, they just nod sheep style at whatever the Sun editor says

 

 

I did an online IQ test and it was well above 100, 148 I think if I remember rightly so I'm not the dimwit you all think.

:rolleyes:

I am not DEFENDING their actions! I've asked you COUNTLESS times within this thread what the point is in killing a reformed character (or even a criminal for that matter - these people can be put to use you know :/)?

 

I'll answer you gladly. Punishment and revenge. A life for a life. I'm not saying all criminals should be hung and not all murderers even, far from it.

I did an online IQ test and it was well above 100, 148 I think if I remember rightly so I'm not the dimwit you all think.

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

 

If you were that intelligent you'd have any idea how to hold your own in an argument without resorting to logical fallacies all the damned time. It's called REASON. If you're that intelligent, learn how to use it.

It amazes me how you continue to defend these two, both here and elsewhere. Oh you're not alone but very much in the minority. Just go on the Sun website or read the very long DS thread. People calling for them to be strung up from lamp-posts and volunteering to do it. Why is there so much hatred for these two? Maybe because they didn't serve long enough inside in the first place for killing a 2 year-old child. I'm far from alone in my feelings of hatred towards them.

How is it defending someone to say that they should be entitled to a fair trial?

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

 

If you were that intelligent you'd have any idea how to hold your own in an argument without resorting to logical fallacies all the damned time. It's called REASON. If you're that intelligent, learn how to use it.

 

 

I just asked my daughter and she said it was 138, definitely. Just because I've only worked from 16 to 18 doesn't mean I'm thick as even my sister thinks I am.

How is it defending someone to say that they should be entitled to a fair trial?

 

 

I agree he should have a fair trial. Absolutely. We wouldn't be here now though if they'd both been locked up for life in an adult jail from age 18.

Edited March 6, 201016 yr by Victor Meldrew

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

 

 

Laugh then. :rolleyes: I got 8 O-levels grade A and B without even bothering to revise, was too lazy to open a book so could have got A-levels and a degree but chose not to study any longer.

Why are you guys even arguing with Chris? He's a product of Murdoch's media, he reads The Sun and that bloody paper has been on spouting this crap for the last ten years. If he wants to think like that LET HIM, he's the idiot if he thinks people are defending the actions of child killers and not just basing what they're saying on FAIR LAWS OF THE LAND.

 

We all know Venables' and Thompson's actions were largely the product of their environment and he wants to believe the bull$h!t then let him. More fool him.

Why are you guys even arguing with Chris? He's a product of Murdoch's media, he reads The Sun and that bloody paper has been on spouting this crap for the last ten years. If he wants to think like that LET HIM, he's the idiot if he thinks people are defending the actions of child killers and not just basing what they're saying on FAIR LAWS OF THE LAND.

 

 

I don't read the Sun. Never buy one and only read it occasionally in the library along with other newpapers or if I find it on a bus or tube. Sometimes look at their website. I can form my own opinions thank-you and one is that 8 years is not enough to serve in custody for the murder of a child.

Edited March 6, 201016 yr by Victor Meldrew

I'd bring back the death penalty tomorrow and start with Thompson and Venables. I'm sure there'd be no shortage of volunteers to be hangman. I'd certainly gladly do it. :)

Well it's nice to know that you'd like the UK to join Iran and Saudi Arabia as the only countries to execute juveniles. Oh, and it's against international law but perhaps that doesn't bother you either.