Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 704
  • Views 37.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We don't need to replace trident. We can not be reached by an Iranian or Korean missile. We don't need nuclear weapons

 

I am against Trident being replaced too, the £80-100bn cost could build a lot of prisons, hospitals, improve the economy with tax cuts etc

 

We already have enough weapons to blow up the world several times over so we should be spending money on other areas

People who are anti-EU make me want to cry and tear my hair out. There are far more benefits to being in the EU than there is for being out of it.
I am against Trident being replaced too, the £80-100bn cost could build a lot of prisons, hospitals, improve the economy with tax cuts etc

 

We already have enough weapons to blow up the world several times over so we should be spending money on other areas

 

Actually, we only now have 15-18% the nuclear weapon warheads capacity we had 25 years ago under Maggie Thatcher.

 

Still great (and unusual) to hear Cameron & Brown ganging up on Clegg with regards his party's idiotic nuclear disarmament policy.

Gordon's wittering on about how well he did during the recession. So well that we suffered the worst of all the developed countries, so well that we muscled our way into being the lead spokespeople on how to recover and cockblocked Kevin Rudd, the leader of the ONLY western country not to enter a recession.

 

The man's a f***ing moron and Cameron is a toff so full of hot air he is the worlds third largest polluter behind China and the USA.

 

Brown frustrates me, the bank crisis WAS HIS FUCKING FAULT, and he sounds like a dirty common south Fifer. If the LibDems aren't running the country on May 7th i'm gone within 15months.

Gordon Brown is talking out his arse on immigration, and he just name checked the Aussies re the points system.

 

Someone call the Aussies, they have immigration spot on.

That debate did pretty much nothing to away any opinion I had one way or the other. I don't any of them performed particularly well to be honest...

Sky News Leaders Debate:

 

Who Won Results:

 

Nick Clegg 41%

Gordon Brown 14%

David Cameron 44%

None of them 1%

Talking to party members afterwards is really irritating. What's the point in journalists asking questions to people who are obviously going to have set loyalties?!!!

1. Nick Clegg

2. Gordon Brown

3. David Cameron

4. Sky News

 

 

Clegg did about as well as last week, while I thought Brown and Cameron both did better than last week. But Sky News' handling was far worse than ITV's - terrible questions, terrible moderator.

1. Nick Clegg

2. Gordon Brown

3. David Cameron

4. Sky News

Clegg did about as well as last week, while I thought Brown and Cameron both did better than last week. But Sky News' handling was far worse than ITV's - terrible questions, terrible moderator.

The "free for all" sections were just a shambles.

Furthermore, having heard about the newspaper headlines regarding his holier than thou attitude with regards to the Churchill War effort against the tyranny of Nazi Germany. Where in a Guardian interview in 2002 he regarded Winston Churchill as a war criminal for the bombing of Dresden; and that the UK atrocities were worse than Germany. Because hey the British tried to exterminate an entire religious race (of six million Jews) didn't they. :rolleyes:

 

If you're really going to trust the Daily Mail's word, then there's little hope for you. Alternatively, you could actually read the original Guardian article for yourself and see what Clegg was actually saying.

 

It was ridiculously even. I thought it was probably a tie with a slight advantage to Cameron, but it was very obvious that both parties are running scared from the Lib Dems given the ganging up that occurred. Clegg was lucky that this debate will get the smallest viewership.

 

And Rich, REALLY? You'd take the BNP over the Lib Dems purely over Trident (a system which doesn't even provide adequate defence against North Korea, who, let it be reminded, attacked South Korea. Not us. And again, they have no reason to attack us, at least not ahead of America.)?

So a Scottish debate 10:30am on Sunday that Salmond is in. I might tape that just to laugh at.

 

 

I'm so playing the Leaders Debate drinking game next week after my first exam.

1. Nick Clegg

2. Gordon Brown

3. David Cameron

4. Sky News

Clegg did about as well as last week, while I thought Brown and Cameron both did better than last week. But Sky News' handling was far worse than ITV's - terrible questions, terrible moderator.

 

I disagree I thought Adam Boulton did a far better job, like a football referee letting the debate flow; instead of intervening ever 25 seconds which became incredibly annoying with the ITV debate.

 

David Cameron was much more forceful and less nervous this time; Gordon Brown clearly has done his swotting but he is hopeless for people watching on TV wanting X-Factor style soundbytes and posturing; Nick Clegg did a pretty decent effort; but is now starting to sound as cliched as the other two; but avoided the pitfalls of his party's policies on Immigration & Defence.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.