Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Views 89.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I feel like all of that is depressingly predictable and almost exactly what you would expect. Though the line ''Immigrants aren't people, honey...'' sounds like the kind of thing no real person would actually say, it's so utterly insane and stupid and hateful.

The human race's capacity to Hate anyone different from themselves, and get behind any moron who feels the same way is endless. From the first tribal murders when Homo Sapiens saw off the Neanderthals and all other competing species, to the current IS.

 

Essentially, stupid insecure people feel threatened by anyone not equally as stupid as themselves, and do all they can to bring everyone down to their level. Donald Trump is SO obviously as thick as two short planks. That's his own insecure chip on his shoulder that leads to his ongoing personal campaigns against anyone that crosses him.

 

The ability to carry on making money once your dad has provided you with it, shows no actual skills, except maybe greed and ruthlessness. He's very very good at those. That's also in the job description of every tyrant that has walked the face of the planet.

 

Love to see Trump on Who Wants To be A Millionaire. Totally worth bringing it back just to have him on it, and to hear him say "I don't need to answer those questions honey, I'm already a millionaire". The man can't even construct a coherent sentence.

I doubt you'd be calling it something the winner had to listen up to if the moderate candidate got 43%.

 

Fair enough but moderate candidates by their description are always taking votes from different areas hence the word moderate. Radical candidates like Saunders are unique to the times we live for varying reasons unique to this era - the financial crisis, the crumbling of the current economic consensus and continued MP corruption. So for Saunders to get that % is unique to this area.

The only thing that could sway enough superdelegates to make him the nominee is if there was some kind of substantial charge brought against her due to the email thing. That's still exceedingly unlikely to happen at all, but it's even less likely we will know anything prior to the convention so Bernie IS done. He might not admit it, his supporters might not accept it, but in EVERY. SINGLE. meaningful way he is done. He hasn't publicly stated as such, but this week has seen a very noted change in his rhetoric, he's still 'fighting', but it's really more about changing the DNC/Democratic Party at this point and he's stated a number of times he will do everything to get HRC to beat Trump, which is in itself pretty much an admission it's done.

Well, no. I mean PROBABLY, yes, but it all depends on how severe the charges are. I'm sure there would be a great deal of pressure for her to remove herself from the race but, unless it's something which explicitly bars her from office, it's not like it's an instant default to Bernie.

 

However, that presupposes she will be indicted, which still remains unlikely.

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Author

Breaking News. Hillary won't face prosecution.

 

The FBI has announced that it will not be recommending Hillary Clinton be prosecuted

Edited by Common Sense

  • 2 weeks later...
All but confirmed that Trump's VP pick will be this guy - a healthy serving of religious nutbaggery on the Republican ticket after all then. I was almost hoping it was gonna be Ivanka.

Trump is up TEN POINTS over Hillary in traditional battleground states when the 2 extra candidates are included and closing in in Michigan.

 

I was right.

 

Say hello to President Trump.

 

The Democrats were too fractured.

Trump is up TEN POINTS over Hillary in traditional battleground states when the 2 extra candidates are included and closing in in Michigan.

 

I was right.

 

Say hello to President Trump.

 

The Democrats were too fractured.

Did you learn nothing from chatting pure bullshit during the primaries?

Yes. It is one set of polls by one firm. You just predicted a definite outcome as a result of one poll which goes against what pretty much every other poll has found, four months out from the election. Again: did you learn nothing from all the times you did this during the primaries and insisted it showed 'MOMENTUM' which made Bernie Sanders 'the inevitable nominee', only to lose by 3 million votes?
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.