Jump to content

Featured Replies

The drinking itself is Lauren's issue, it is a disease, but Lucy was supposed to be her friend and she used Lauren's alcohol problem to (A) ruin her relationship and (B) steal her boyfriend.

Wasn't Joey with Lucy before though. It would make more sense to keep them together because cousins in a relationship is a bit random for the writers of EE to do imo.

  • Replies 1k
  • Views 44k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I haven't read the spoilers but I'll be pissed off if they try and make out it's Lucy's fault that Lauren is a massive dickhead who drinks for lolz.

 

That would make for good viewing... Everyone turning against her, then her pissing off for good like she should have done long, long ago.

Let Lucy go but keep Lauren, least Lauren can act and isnt like a frozen lump of ice.

Half way through tonight's ep and it's already one of the very worst ever. Snakes on the loose. Dead mice. "Her royal Dottiness". (OK that actually made me laugh but still.) What has happened to this show?!

 

Watched this for the first time in months to see that Alice is still the dampest squib going. Why have they not hacked her to pieces yet!? So awful.

She really is. :lol: When Michael threatened to "destroy her", that was really piss poor acting.

 

Good episode tonight, though. Lauren's acting was on top form, APU. :wub:

The Jac Jossa fan talking about "piss poor acting"? :D

 

the whole week has been a write off. Ugh.

 

The Jac Jossa fan talking about "piss poor acting"? :D

Jacqueline is amazing. http://i759.photobucket.com/albums/xx240/MarthaJonesFan/MSN%20Smilies/hm-1.png She's maybe not the best, but she's better than most of the other young cast. :cry:

---Tyler---

is leaving later this year.

Thank god for that! :cheer: Can they replace him with

Matt Lapinskas

, plz. :cry:

You really do have the most dreadful taste in EastEnders! Tyler is a bit shit (his exit is definitely overdue) but Anthony was OFF THE SCALE dreadful. And not hot at all.

 

When Michael threatened to "destroy her", that was really piss poor acting.

 

I saw that the other day and laughed my head off! :lol:

 

Eastenders really isn't what it used to be...

I saw that the other day and laughed my head off! :lol:

 

Eastenders really isn't what it used to be...

None of the soaps are, TBF. It's slowly turned into young-character-storyline-dominance, especially in Emmerdale - which is a soap that used to be about all the old regular characters, etc.

How on earth is Emmerdale dominated by teens? Apart from Amy most of them are strictly supporting characters...

 

How on earth is Emmerdale dominated by teens? Apart from Amy most of them are strictly supporting characters...

 

Holly's (is that even her name?) drug storyline, Belle's "growing up" storyline, etc. It's maybe not all teens necessarily, but most of the storylines seem to be about the younger characters - Robbie, Rachel, etc.

LOL Rachel is about 30, that was Belle's first story in years, Robbie is in his 20s and not even overly prominent, and Holly left over a year ago. Sorry but I don't think you have a point. I've never heard anybody say Emmerdale was too youth-centric before.

Edited by Jark

LOL Rachel is about 30, that was Belle's first story in years, Robbie is in his 20s and not even overly prominent, and Holly left over a year ago. Sorry but I don't think you have a point. I've never heard anybody say Emmerdale was too youth-centric before.

When have we last seen a major storyline in Emmerdale that doesn't surround under 40's, and some of the characters involved aren't younger than most of the cast, who are nearly in their 70's? Excluding Brenda's cancer story, of course.

 

Poor Rachel, though, she looks as if she's about 19. Belle's story is still a major one, no matter how recent it is, and Robbie's story with Katie/Declan/Megan was fairly prominent, I think.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.