Mine is factual. Yours is based on an extremely right wing country's definition.

 

You are incorrigible! :(

You just want to use an extremely warped scale to pretend you are left wing. You aren't.

Let's take a lil look at how terrified the neoliberal elite is of Corbyn.

 

1.) The party ACTIVELY sabotaged itself in the GE, and Mad May STILL COULDN'T WIN. The blue Labour neoliberal Blairites only pretended to do online campaigning. Fortunately, we in Momentum did it for them.

 

https://www.thecanary.co/uk/analysis/2018/07/16/new-evidence-of-anti-corbyn-sabotage-makes-the-general-election-result-even-more-extraordinary/

 

2. BBTory

 

Here we have an ACTUALLY independent media reporting on the dark money of the Tories, such as their DUP payments and Saudi connections.They also report the UK media, Sky and BBTory included, completely ignored it.

 

https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/what-con...Snl1g6Xk3iwlPEY

 

3. BBC encouraging the right wing, like Farage, and in return becoming more right wing itself. It has lost a million listeners from its politics radio programmes due to clear right wing bias.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/bbc-ra...impression=true

 

Basically, BBC bias. It has been pushed further and further to the right.

 

4. Silas would be better summing up this article than me, as it's economics. Basically, the neoliberals have been propagandising against Labour's economic models and mischaracterising them. Vidcapper should read this one. It also says Labour will borrow to invest, whereas the Tories have borrowed to cut the taxes of their ultra rich friends and, um, themselves.

 

https://www.opendemocracy.net/neweconomics/...lly-neoliberal/

 

5. Ignoring Tory anti semitism

 

Again the media. The media attacks Labour with headline after headline, watch the BBC. It gets a story and sticks with it for weeks. Meanwhile, a Tory at a NAZI THEMED PARTY gets a small story and the media just brush it off.

 

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/10589234/T...uiry-finds.html

 

 

6. Media bias

 

This article looks at a report that found the Guardian and the BBC were the WORST culprits in reporting inaccuracies about anti semitism within Labour. It details how the media in the country is overwhelmingly right wing, and the supposedly left wing media is, well, not particularly left wing. We saw this with The Guardian's uncritical airtime for Mad May, letting her post an article in it with no comment from them. Imagine The Sun or Daily Mail if Corbyn wrote a letter for them!! One. They wouldn't publish it. Two, if they somehow DID, they would dedicate headlines and pages and pages to criticising it and him.

 

https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/lib...-it-likes-think

 

Here is a Guardian article on the same thing for people who don't like the morning star, but do like the daily mail. It shows the research, the researchers, and mentions how they say the media basically acted like this to create a witch hunt against Corbyn. Like I said before, anti semitism DISAPPEARED!!! from the nightly BBC headlines and news in general THE DAY AFTER THE ELECTION. It only reappeared for the local elections, conveniently when the Tories were zooming down the opinion polls. The day after the local elections, oh, it disappeared from the BBC again. Funny that.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/s...vEZwkKTrZhAXKss

 

 

7. Police and Tories

 

We all know about Peterlee. We all know about Hillsborough. We all know the police, Brookes and the Tories were in bed together. Some of us know the Tories have sent police to train with the Israeli security services. Now we know this:

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguard...ups-for-decades

 

The police overwhelmingly infiltrated left wing groups, not right wing. The elite is all in it together.

 

As we can see, the media and the elite are dead set against the left wing. It is why there is so much propaganda and hate against Corbyn. Even the BBC is just part of this elite, Supreme Leader-lovin propaganda machine. It is why there are so many negative headlines in the BBC and even the Guardian, and why there are so many lies and inaccuracies. They do not like the neoliberal status quo to be affected in any way. It is a rush to the privatisation bottom.

 

Not sure how to make links look pretty though. I tried and it didn't't work.

John McDonnell says Labour's massive renationalisation plan will not cost the taxpayer a PENNY despite analysis showing nation would have to splash out £176billion to pay for it

 

Labour have vowed to renationalise rail, mail electricity and water companies

Shadow chancellor said taxpayers will reap rewards of public sector ownership

But Tories said the Labour Party cannot be trusted with the UK' economy

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-63...t-taxpayer.html

 

**************************

 

Someone's not telling the truth - I leave it up to you to decide which...

Tories. They even misquoted an economist to claim this, which the economist later denied. What a surprise.

 

Nationalisation is actually free :)

 

He media has outdone itself in Labour barrel scraping. It has tried to link the USA FAR RIGHT NAZI SYNAGOGUE SHOOTING tooo Corbyn. Yes. Really. They are not above using mass murders as a way to score political points now. I wonder how much money the landed gentry plutocrats are bunging them?

So what happened in 1948 then Vid?

 

In 1948, the government nationalised £1bn worth of railway assets without paying a penny. They issued IOUs – British Transport Stock - redeemable 40 years later from railway receipts. “For each £100 of Railway Stock, the holder would receive such an amount of Stock as in the opinion of the Treasury is the equivalent value of Government securities”. It was a master stroke.

Tories. They even misquoted an economist to claim this, which the economist later denied. What a surprise.

 

Nationalisation is actually free :)

 

He media has outdone itself in Labour barrel scraping. It has tried to link the USA FAR RIGHT NAZI SYNAGOGUE SHOOTING tooo Corbyn. Yes. Really. They are not above using mass murders as a way to score political points now. I wonder how much money the landed gentry plutocrats are bunging them?

 

About the same that grows on Labour's Magic Money Tree? :rolleyes:

So what happened in 1948 then Vid?

 

In 1948, the government nationalised £1bn worth of railway assets without paying a penny. They issued IOUs – British Transport Stock - redeemable 40 years later from railway receipts. “For each £100 of Railway Stock, the holder would receive such an amount of Stock as in the opinion of the Treasury is the equivalent value of Government securities”. It was a master stroke.

 

But you don't indicate whether the promised money after 40 years actually turned up - and given what I know of the economy in 1978, I have my doubts. (but i'll check)

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Act_1947

 

Even if it did, half the dispossessed shareholders would have dropped dead in the intervening 40 years...

Edited October 29, 20186 yr by vidcapper

Not a magic money tree. Stop reading the daily mail x

 

Th e Tories seem to have plenty for war, rich business subsidies and tax cuts, and bribes soooo

But you don't indicate whether the promised money after 40 years actually turned up - and given what I know of the economy in 1978, I have my doubts. (but i'll check)

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Act_1947

 

Even if it did, half the dispossessed shareholders would have dropped dead in the intervening 40 years...

Forty years on from 1948 was 1988. Typical quitter arithmetic :lol:

Forty years on from 1948 was 1988. Typical quitter arithmetic :lol:

 

Ah, but the Act didn't come into sffect until 1948, so it is technically correct... ;)

 

IN any case, I have been unable to locate the source of 'Doctor Death's quote on the matter...

Edited October 29, 20186 yr by vidcapper

Ah, but the Act didn't come into sffect until 1948, so it is technically correct... ;)

 

IN any case, I have been unable to locate the source of 'Doctor Death's quote on the matter...

No it isn't. You said that 40 years on was 1978. I'm well aware of the fact that the NHS started in 1948, thank you very much.

No it isn't. You said that 40 years on was 1978. I'm well aware of the fact that the NHS started in 1948, thank you very much.

 

Ah, I see now - perhaps I can blame it on my medical condition... :heehee:

http://www.transportmyths.co.uk/Nationalisation.htm

 

^That was my source.

http://www.transportmyths.co.uk/Nationalisation.htm

 

^That was my source.

 

Thanks

Still haven't anseered why you believed the Tories, who are known for lying, over Labour and tried to make an equivalency between the evil lying propaganda driven landed gentry Tories and fact based Labour

Still haven't anseered why you believed the Tories, who are known for lying, over Labour and tried to make an equivalency between the evil lying propaganda driven landed gentry Tories and fact based Labour

 

Don't hold your breath. ;)

Labour MP Fiona Onasanya is currently standing trial accused of perverting the course of justice. Her brother pled guilty to the same charge last week

Labour MP Fiona Onasanya is currently standing trial accused of perverting the course of justice. Her brother pled guilty to the same charge last week

 

Why risk the charge of PTCOJ for a trivial matter of a speeding ticket? :wacko:

Kate Osamor has resigned from Labour's Shadow Cabinet. She has been accused of misconduct surrounding her son, who was found guilty of drug dealing & whom she continued to employ as an advisor. In addition, she then assaulted a journalist who asked her about the allegations by throwing water over him.