Thousands of years of tradition, if something has been this way for thousands of years it should not change IMHO

Why? Appealing to tradition is one of the stupidest cop outs I've ever come across - 'it's been like this for ages, so therefore it shouldn't change'. Why? What benefit is there from this principle? We'd be using bloody candles and be Luddites if we practiced this principle...

On the front page of News/Perspectives it says - Thought provoking and controversial issues.

 

If I had called for the genocide of all blacks or asians or whatever then absolutely, warning or ban would be justified but I didn't, I have not made a single post that I deem to be racist, controversial/thought provoking ? yes absolutely, racist ? no

 

This is by far the most politically correct board that I have ever come across in the 11 years that I have been using the net and it is getting quite ridiculous tbh, people screaming and crying "racist" all the time even people my age who should know better, is it any wonder I make about 30 posts on DS now for every 1 that I do here, on DS I don't get the PC brigade crying racist left right and centre, there is mature debate of the issues as opposed to slogans and catcphrases and soundbites of "racist" every time there is anything remotely controversial posted on here.

 

One of these days I can see me giving up altogether, BJ News/Perspectives is an online branch of the socialist workers party almost, I am the only right winger here and when I say anything right wing I am branded a racist and people report me to admin or call for me to be banned or warned.

 

News/Perspectives as it says on the tin is for thought provoking and controversial issues

 

There is thought provoking and debate, and then there is you Craig. There are right wingers, and then there are you Craig. You can f***ing deny it all you want, but you are a f***ing racist, pure and simple. Branding mixed race babies as unclean and unpure is about as racist as it comes... surely you can see that? Nobody would have any objections to you being a Tory if you BACKED UP YOUR f***ING POINTS, but you, like most Torys out there, think one thing applies in your area and therefore applies to the whole f***ingcountry, you seem to forget "Saint Thatcher" completley f***ed up the North of England, but nooo London is fine so the rest of the UK must be.

 

Back to you being a vile little racist, I honestly dont see how you can deny that thats what you are or say you dont support any BNP policies when you refer to "indiginous Britons" and are against whites and blacks breeding as if whites are taking a step down to lower class scum. It f***ing baffles me.

 

To sum up, I hope that one of these days you do "give up altogether" because managment arent going to f***ing get rid of you any time soon, so I suggest you do it yourself. You will NOT be missed.

James, NOT HELPING

Closed.

Craig has been permanently banned from the site.

 

Please do continue discussing the Labour leadership election (and not Craig.)

We need a new right winger!

OK, I didn't want to delete all of Craig's posts and all the responses because I don't believe in censorship, but I'm so also anal that I couldn't bear having them clogging up the Labour leadership thread, so I split the topics. :P Having read through it all again, I still don't quite understand what exactly started his rant...

this thread should be pinned.

We need a new right winger!

Theo Walcott? Cristiano Ronaldo? Aaron Lennon? :unsure:

 

*but-tum-tish*

Would just like to point out to Craig, even though you harper on about skin colour/dna changing due to 'inter-breeding' (such a dutty word), it shouldn't concern you anyway. You'll be six feet under before any of this actually happens (if it does!!).

We need a new right winger!

 

I'm more to the centre, although given how leftist this site is, I'm sure that counts as right wing :P

We need a new right winger!

This one time i woke up and thought "$h!t, i'm a Tory".

 

 

 

 

 

 

But then i diagnosed myself as a mere liberal-conservative. and even then i use that term very vaguely.

And no-one picked him up on using the term Abo to describe the indigenous natives of Australia.

 

Good riddance.

And no-one picked him up on using the term Abo to describe the indigenous natives of Australia.

 

Good riddance.

I think he'd more than dug his own grave by that point. There didn't seem any need to add yet another offence to the list.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42207000/jpg/_42207552_evolution4.jpg

 

Conservatives (left) circa 100,000 years; Lefties, liberals and chavs (right) circa 100,000 years hence.

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6057734.stm

Edited September 30, 201014 yr by Ethan.

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/42207000/jpg/_42207552_evolution4.jpg

 

Conservatives (left) circa 100,000 years; Lefties, liberals and chavs (right) circa 100,000 years hence.

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6057734.stm

 

I think you got something the wrong way round there

I think you got something the wrong way round there

 

Nope.

Or, just a thought, perhaps political viewpoints won't come into it? :drama: I have to say, the idea of a heartless Ubermensch does seem a little too Nietzschean for me. Beyond Good and Evil on the MENSA reading list lately then Ethan?

Nope.

 

Erm, well the idea that the human race is going to split in two isn't exactly the viewpoint of a "superior" species is it? I notice that article is about four years old, you'd assume if this had any basis on fact we'd have heard something since.