shadow jog on I don't get why you post on here when all you do is complain. you aint no fan. you hater. you hater. and you aint no dat.

 

LMAO! Uh, okay. ;) A hater who has seen them live twice, went to their 30 Days signing, got their book, all their albums, their calendars and supported them since early 2009?

 

Just because I don't fangirl over everything they do and actually post some criticism doesn't mean i'm a hater. The Sats have been pretty much a joke in the industry for years now and as long as they continue to come out with average songs and deliver average performances I will continue to criticise them. It's f***ing America that they're trying to break, guys. AMERICA! Does anyone here honestly think 'What About Us' is the best material they could have came up with for breaking that market? They record songs like White Lies, All Fired Up, Notorious, Get Ready Get Set, Higher, Wordshaker etc and yet for America they choose this to launch them?

 

On the positive side (shocker) - their gig in the US the other night looked like it was pretty full which is pretty good because it was their own gig, and 'What About Us' is much more radio friendly than the last two singles they've released.

Does anyone here honestly think 'What About Us' is the best material they could have came up with for breaking that market? They record songs like White Lies, All Fired Up, Notorious, Get Ready Get Set, Higher, Wordshaker etc and yet for America they choose this to launch them?

 

 

Bro - how do you know this when you havn't heard it - a musty cam-phone recording of a live club performance is all we got right now

Wow. I'm quite shocked that people think What About Us could be a On Your Radar leftlover (unless you meant because of the dance sound and not the quality) and that it is inferior to shitty tracks like Wordshaker or White Lies. It's no All Fired Up, that's for sure, but damn, from that a poor recording video, it sounds really good.

 

I do agree that it might not be the best track to launch themselves in America (but then White Lies and Wordshaker aren't either), but it sounds like the typical and perfect follow up for the UK....and that's all I'm asking. America is a bonus. If they get it, amazing, if not...Well, sad, but moving on.

What About Us is amazing. End of.

 

Does it sound like something off On Your Radar? No. It's not light and fluffy. I've always felt that the material of On Your Radar felt really smooth and fluffy for some reason (not a bad thing). What About Us feels heavy and chunky (not a bad thing).

 

Is it a good sequel to On Your Radar? Yes.

 

People need to realise that The Saturdays are The Saturdays, they don't dance like PCD, and they wont churn out the more original pieces from the Girls Aloud back catalogue. They are your girls next door that sing and do a bit of dancing and have a laugh on stage. They're actually dare I say, possibly the girl group that actually has the most genuine relationships with each other over their career. That is supposed to be their appeal. Just beacuse they're not as 'elaborate' and loud as some other groups doesn't mean they're not as good.

 

That may be boring for some people, but what ever floats your boat.

 

 

All Fired Up.. the atmosphere looked amazing.

Edited October 7, 201212 yr by 2ndAdventure

This is why I tend to try and stay away from The Saturdays forum now'a days. I remember a couple of years ago, it was okay to have an opinion in here. Just because some people have a little bit of doubt in the girls it does not make them a hater, shadow2009 has supported the girls all along. So please don't go around criticising other people for having an opinion. I love the girls to pieces, but that does not mean I will love every song I do. The girls are amazing at what they do, and I will always love them, but what some of us are saying is that there are new girlbands on the scene and if the girls want to stay up front they need to up their game. Disagree with what I say if you must, but it is my opinion and I do not expect others to share the same opinion. But calling someone a hater for having an opinion? Don't make me laugh :wacko:

I know for sure that shadow2009 is one of their biggest fan and this is the reason why he wants the girls to step up their game so much. That's why I actually didn't agree with that comment about shadow being a hater or whatever (that was ridiculous) but the thing is...they don't need to step up their game.

 

Girls Aloud/The Saturdays actually co-existed together at the same time and there were the most similar girlgroups ever. Weren't the Sugababes also still a bit "in" at that time? Anyway. Girls Aloud released "The Loving Kind" at the same time The Saturdays released "Issues". The Saturdays actually peaked higher and I reckon they sold a bit more also ? I don't remember people saying that GA needed to step up their games or there were going to lose their place on the music/girlband scene. It's really normal for new girlbands to do better than previous ones. Hype and stuff.

 

Since Little Mix are from the X-Factor (and people seem to forget that...and also that they were being watched by millions of people), I'll compare them to One Direction. They even share a bit of the same fanbase with Perrie dating Zayn. So, in less than a year, One Direction's popularity in the UK halved. I mean, a lead single that sells 85k in its first week for such a group? That could actually happen to Little Mix. Stop acting like these new girlgroups are going to have success until the end of their careers. They won't. The Saturdays had a really strong debut on the charts, so who knows what's going to happen next.

 

Little Mix and Stooshe are very different to The Saturdays and I think the public see that. Stooshe is doing Pop RnB, The Saturdays are doing Pop Dance and Little Mix are mixing Pop with all music genres possible. Their styling is different. Little Mix are supposed to look like average looking girls, dressed in average if not ugly and unstylish clothes/outfits, while The Saturdays are supposed to be all glamour and sexy. Stooshe is on the weird-funky kind of classy styling. They really are three different girlgroups.

 

However, let's see if The Saturdays can get great airplay with What About Us (and by that I mean 3-4 weeks in the top 10 airplay which is what I consider good-great airplay) and have a little hit with it (selling more than 200k would already be a huge relieve after the lattest flops). If they do, then I think there's nothing to change. If it flops worse than 30 Days/My Heart Takes Over, then yeah, I reckon they would need to change things a bit, but until then, let's not getting into fights for a song that isn't even out yet and we actually haven't heard properly yet either.

 

 

Sorry for the double post, but I just saw the performance of DNA at th Teen Choices award.

 

 

It's a poor recording, but it's actually pretty good because we can use it to compare The Saturdays' performance of What About Us to this one.

The truth is...

01. Little Mix can't dance better than The Saturdays (but I'm not saying they can't dance, don't jump at me).

02. They don't have better routines at all (I really prefer the sexy routine of WAU to that really simple and mostly just posing and moving my hand the DNA one has).

03. They aren't really that better vocally either (Perrie has a strong voice, but her tone is really weird, a lot more deeper than Rochelle which really doesn't work in her favour. Jade has a such a cute voice. But then .... you got Rochelle, Una and Vanessa, guys. The three of them can sing as good as Jade and Perrie, if not better. Plus, I sincerely think Mollie and Frankie are on the same level as Jesy and Leigh-Anne).

04. You can't hear their weakest singers (Jesy and Leigh-Anne) as you can't really hear Frankie and Mollie on the cam-phone recording of What About Us.

 

They really are on the same league. People need to stop saying The Saturdays have to step up their games. Oh and they obviously used the backing track for the choir bit. But you know what ? It's alright! No shame. Because this is a typical good girlband performance. It was great. It's not like the girls sounded bad or anything (well from what we could hear)...but my point is ... this is a performance that The Saturdays could have delivered also.

 

I'll post the What About Us performance again so you guys can judge.

 

Comparing last year to this year I've not really posted that much in The Saturdays forum, I felt last year that everyone got along fine, but looking at this year it's just full of hate, it's full of negativity. I mean I know everyone is entitled to an opinion but how can you judge a song (that sounds amazing live) without hearing the studio/Sean Paul version?

 

Shadow, I understand you love The Saturdays (As Do I) and you get frustrated, but recentley you've just been complaining non stop. Earlier you said this

The Sats have been pretty much a joke in the industry for years now and as long as they continue to come out with average songs and deliver average performances I will continue to criticise them. It's f***ing America that they're trying to break, guys. AMERICA!

 

I fail to see how they are seen as a joke in the industry? They've not had a massive airplay hit or haven't had a massive television promo! Their management have cost them big time regarding releases etc, Higher/Ego should have been lead singles etc. We can complain about the past or look forward until there new album. I would also not call Notorious, All Fired Up or What About Us(Judging by live) average. If they get the right airplay they will crack america. Look at Cher Lloyd (Want U Back) Ellie Goulding (Lights)

 

I'm looking at things in positive ways in America, they have had two full gigs and are having their first headline show with more than four songs! It wouldn't surprise me if they supported an act on tour in upcoming months in America also. Mercury are handing there release perfect.

I'm not saying, we've all got to love The Saturdays & be positive, but the same thing over and over is boring. Don't judge What About Us until you hear the final live performance.

Little Mix and Stooshe comparisons, as expected as they are, aren't very fair. I agree that these two groups are still trying to find their sound, which is what a debut album should be all about, imo (for pop artists anyway). But they're managing to get success whilst they're trying to find their niche. Whereas with The Saturdays, they're 5 years+ ahead and seem to be getting nowhere with anything anymore. They're not struggling to find the "sound" that works best for them ('Up', 'Ego', 'Higher', 'White Lies' - pure, solid pop!) they're just struggling to realise what sound makes them, The Saturdays, and are failing to capitalise on it!

 

They should be at a much higher level this late on in their careers and should be showing both Little Mix and Stooshe how it's done. Pretty much like Girls Aloud were, when The Saturdays came on the scene! - even before the Cheryl/XF connection, they were capitalising on the sound that made them popular (Xenomania), realising what that sound was and capitalising on it which meant success after success - it was rare they would rehash some of their older hits. However, it's completely the opposite for me, less so with Stooshe, but as a live act Stooshe (and Little Mix) shit all over The Saturdays. They're showing The Sats how to do it and are putting them to shame at the moment.

 

The Saturdays are needing a genuine, big hit, and are needing it BADLY. 'What About Us' definitely has the potential to do that, but we shall wait and see. As a Sats fan, you learn to "never hold our breath" and take each day as it comes.

 

This era really is going to be the make or break for them. So far, the reviews for them have definitely been in their favour! Lets hope they can play to their strengths and learn from their mistakes from past eras and actually get enough momentum to launch 3 or 4 singles off an album again!

Lee, it does make me chuckle when you say this forum is full of "hate and negativity". I see it in quite the opposite way - it's probably the most constantly positive Saturdays forum I've ever come across! This section is usually full of adulation and "stan" like comments... which is fine and dandy, but sometimes it's refreshing for there to be some constructive criticism as well. A bit of light and shade. Criticism from fans *isn't* hate!

 

The way I see it, hating and negativity would be along these lines: "Ugly slags, can't sing for shit, all their songs are crap" and worse. That isn't being said in this forum. The comments are more about their general level of success, where things have gone a bit wrong for them & the theoretical ways they could improve. If anything, this is realism and a sign of fans who aren't complacent about the group they're passionate about.

 

The Saturdays are seen as a bit of a joke at times, not only with the public but particularly with music fans who aren't hardcore Saturdays lovers. I think these are some of the reasons why they're often regarded in that sort of light:

 

* The fact they've never been able to secure themselves an X Factor slot has become something of a running joke with this group. For the past 3 years, it's been a constant & unfulfilled hope for their fans. In fact, them appearing on any major TV show is few and far between.

* 'Wordshaker' rather swiftly undid all the good work they'd put in throughout the 'Chasing Lights' era, and it's very difficult to shake off the flop label.

* The "midweek #1, ending up at #3" 'Missing You' situation was a bit embarrassing, and that was mainly because The Sats themselves made such a big deal out of being midweek #1, telling anyone who'd listen. Indeed, their transparent desire for a #1 hit has given the group an air of desperation.

* Missing the Top 20 with an album that was confidently released with as many as 7 different formats wasn't exactly their finest hour.

* Mollie commented that their 2011 arena tour "cemented them" in the UK. The reality was this: it was a half-capacity/non-sell out arena tour which was in support of an album that tanked. I say this because they tend to act like they're bigger than they really are. Trying to convince the public you're really big stars doesn't exactly work.

* 9 times out of 10, their media coverage revolves around their respective love lives. They tend to only put across the "celebrity boyfriend" aspect of themselves across, which makes them come across as a bit vacuous and not very interesting. I think there's definitely a lack of connection with the public & The Saturdays.

 

I don't regard them as a joke; honestly I really do like them (and I dislike that I feel I need to affirm this, but I really don't like people thinking I'm a "hater"). There really are *a lot* of positive aspects to The Saturdays that I really love and enjoy as a fan! It's just, I do have opinions regarding their shortcomings as well, and I don't wear rose-tinted glasses. :kink:

 

P.S. Jonjo listed a lot of great points in his post, regarding their sound identity crisis, and how the new girl groups on the block have shown them up this year. I definitely agree with that.

I do agree that they have a sound identity crisis. Pop music is what people like from them. Although, I gotta say I'd take Notorious and All Fired Up anytime over Up and White Lies for example...but I could easily accept a return to their old sound if it could really help them. However, it seems they also have a problem on their image/styling (it does change every 4 months)

...but then I don't think the new girlgroups have shown them anything...or maybe just that if you got a very very very good airplay (you may actually want to give a look at a bit of Stooshe's Black Heart airplay : #14 - #09 - #08 - #04 - #03 - #03 - #06 - #05 - #04 - #20 - #31 - #15 - #20 - #20 [...] Now, please take a look at The Saturdays airplay and laugh hard) you will get a 400k selling single. I could do the same for Little Mix's "Wings". Oh and Little Mix have shown that if you're from the X-Factor, you'll get a performance on the show and a lot of hype.

 

Give these two girlgroups the airplay of All Fired Up (which is already better than everything these girlgroups have released) and I'm pretty sure they won't sell as much. Take these amazing big TV slots away from them and you pretty much get a success ala The Saturdays, even from these new girlgroups.

 

I just think it's unfair to compare success-wise these 3 girlgroups when they clearly don't get the same privileges. One got a big hit because it had an amazing airplay and the other one comes from the biggest singing TV-show on the UK tv. The Saturdays had to build their fame by working very hard. In that way, they already have shown Little Mix how it's done. Back to Stooshe, they have one hit for the moment, their first single did as good as If This Is Love so I won't judge anything yet. We shall wait for the third single and see how it does.

 

If we're talking live, I still think The Saturdays are on the same league as these two girlgroups. Listen to that DNA performance. You could think they actually sound slightly better than The Saturdays on their WAU performance, fine. It's an opinion like another...But "shit all over" ... No. Little Mix also use backing vocals just like The Saturdays. They aren't really "shitting all over" them live. These two girlgroups are great and both got their weaknesses.

Edited October 8, 201212 yr by Hurricane

I don't see the point in "taking away" any of their radio airplay or TV slots though. Their label have obviously worked very hard for them to get the promo slots they have and like I said, the XF performance connection with Little Mix hasn't happened yet, so it's irrelevant. They're getting the airplay they need to get a hit and we all know how hard it is for some acts to break through with their first single, without the big, first XF performance. 'Red & Black' really wasn't as big a promotion slot as people on here were making it out to be.

 

It also helps that both Stooshe and Little Mix are likable and relatable to their target audience. The Saturdays, for me anyway, personality wise come off as though they're the greatest girl group in the UK and in reality, at the time, they were the only girl group near enough. They had that going for them, but the sales of their albums, singles and tours are embarrassing, especially for an act who had no other competition.

 

Oh and we all know how the winners of XF have a "curse"! It could have gone the complete opposite direction for Little Mix, like some people were predicting, but the fact they seem to be having a say in what direction they want to go in and getting hands on with the song writing, shows how much work they're willing to put into everything they do.

 

The only reason I see why they haven't been dropped yet, is because of that. They've had no competition, so they could actually live off the "biggest girl group in the UK" tag, by default. But they really, really do need to get their heads out of their asses and start taking things SERIOUSLY. It's been said throughout many points in this forum, some of them don't seem as passionate about what they're doing and come across as though they're only in it for the money and the fame, when they look so bored when performing. The only ones I think, who are passionate about the job they're doing is Una and maybe, possibly Rochelle. That's why they're the more likable two, although I'm guessing Rochelle could come across as quite rude in interviews etc...

 

Oh and as for live, use better, proper videos! Seriously. Little Mix's harmonies are on point, as are Stooshe's. The Saturdays are more in a similar position to The Spice Girls/Girls Aloud (except without the success) in that people are quick to brush them off for not being capable of holding a tune or two live, but hardcore stans know otherwise, but they're just not as strong together as their competitiors. But I just think LM and Stooshe are easily the two best girl groups vocally and harmony wise, since Destiny's Child, at LEAST. Both are solid! It's even more impressive for Little Mix, coz as I've said, they've had less time to work together.

 

 

 

 

Sorry, but both LM and Stooshe are easily better than The Sats when acoustic/acapella. Oh and LOL at Stooshe showing The Sats how to do one of those online, chat things! :lol:

The Saturdays, Little Mix & Stooshe are all different and all have their flaws and plus sides. What some of us are trying to say is that they are coming out with solid songs, and really good promo. I mean lets look at 30 Days, the promo for that was good but could have been better. This isn't the girls faults at all, it's obvious that they get let down by their management a lot, for me they are very similar to The Wanted, and Little Mix are a female One Direction. I really hope What About Us does it for the girls, even if it doesn't get number one but can stay in the charts for over 5 weeks like they're singles used to. The reason I fell in love with The Saturdays is because they were bringing out good solid pop music, for me Higher will be one of my favourite Pop songs of all time. What About Us does sound absolutely incredible, and I pray to god that the studio version is 10x better, but if it doesn't have the right promo then it will just be another Top 10 single that was in the charts for a couple of weeks.

 

And as for live, I've seen the girls 4 times live. I was quite annoyed with the On Your Radar tour as auto-tune was used in quite a few of the songs, but the girls put on a good show when ever they perform live! I've also seen Little Mix & Stooshe live once, I saw Little Mix on The X-Factor Tour & I saw Stooshe when they supported Nicki Minaj at the NIA Birmingham, they were both extremely good live. The Saturdays seem to enjoy their live performances more than Stooshe or Little Mix do. But that is just my opinion. :)

its not fair to compare AFU - its a dance song slowed down for a one off. it obviously isn't gonna work as good as naturally slow or mid-tempo songs lol

 

sorry if im coming across wicked to anyof you, im a nice person honest!

Jonjo, this is going nowhere. What if The Saturdays are actually less good singers than the girls from Stooshe and Little Mix? It's not by stepping up their game that Frankie and Mollie are gonna turn into Celine Dion. I just don't see where this debate is going. You all want the girls to step up their games, yet, you're the first ones to say they won't never be as good vocalists as these other girls. Here's the thing, they won't get any better in one year. Working on a voice takes a lot of time. The only thing they can work on quickly is their harmonies...but that's not their job. It's their vocal coach's job (for live performances, that is) or the producers when they record a track.

 

So, apparently, The Saturdays aren't as great singers. Alright. The girls can still dance better. Oh, and that one is sure : they look a lot better. Especially in the videos you just posted.

 

As you can see with the DNA performance of Little Mix, give them an uptempo track and they will do EXACTLY the same thing as The Saturdays, which is use a backing track, provide an awful routine and lyp-synch to the hard bits to sing live. Just like your old good Saturdays.

Yes, they are better when they do acapella...So ? :unsure: Why can't The Saturdays be the less good singers? I don't get it. Why do they ABSOLUTELY need to be the better singers of the bunch? You just put that performance of All Fired Up in which they sound amazing...okay, not as good as the others...so what? They are the less good singers of the bunch, that doesn't make them bad singers. I just don't see where this is going.

 

You're talking like they were the best singers around and finally a girlgroup just shown up they can sing better and it's the end of the world now. The Saturdays who you thought were the better singers of all time just got shadowed by new girls. Well, it's not the case. The Saturdays were never such amazing vocalists in the first place. They were never Beyonce, Mariah Carey, Celine Dion, Christina Aguilera and Whitney put in a girlgroup. So it was just a matter of time until someone could come up with a girlgroup with better voices, or at least with voices that can work better together.

 

But that doesn't change anything. LIVE, as I said, Little Mix are on the same level. Yes, they might put a lot more effort when they are on cozy couch and ready to bring out amazing harmonies, but when they need to be on their feet and dance in front of a really big public, they do exactly like The Saturdays. Worse, I sincerely think The Saturdays did a better job on that WAU performance.

 

And no, their label hasn't worked hard to get Little Mix any airplay, we all know is due to Capital FM/Syco links and Radio 1 supporting them. It wasn't hard at all for Little Mix to break through, they pretty much already did. They were in the biggest TV shows for like 10 weeks, they went on tour, etc. Their first single was hugely anticipated unlike many new artists that people never heard of who release their first single.

Jonjo, this is going nowhere. What if The Saturdays are actually less good singers than the girls from Stooshe and Little Mix? It's not by stepping up their game that Frankie and Mollie are gonna turn into Celine Dion. I just don't see where this debate is going. You all want the girls to step up their games, yet, you're the first ones to say they won't never be as good vocalists as these other girls. Here's the thing, they won't get any better in one year. Working on a voice takes a lot of time. The only thing they can work on quickly is their harmonies...but that's not their job. It's their vocal coach's job (for live performances, that is) or the producers when they record a track.

 

So, apparently, The Saturdays aren't as great singers. Alright. The girls can still dance better. Oh, and that one is sure : they look a lot better. Especially in the videos you just posted.

 

As you can see with the DNA performance of Little Mix, give them an uptempo track and they will do EXACTLY the same thing as The Saturdays, which is use a backing track, provide an awful routine and lyp-synch to the hard bits to sing live. Just like your old good Saturdays.

Yes, they are better when they do acapella...So ? :unsure: Why can't The Saturdays be the less good singers? I don't get it. Why do they ABSOLUTELY need to be the better singers of the bunch? You just put that performance of All Fired Up in which they sound amazing...okay, not as good as the others...so what? They are the less good singers of the bunch, that doesn't make them bad singers. I just don't see where this is going.

 

You're talking like they were the best singers around and finally a girlgroup just shown up they can sing better and it's the end of the world now. The Saturdays who you thought were the better singers of all time just got shadowed by new girls. Well, it's not the case. The Saturdays were never such amazing vocalists in the first place. They were never Beyonce, Mariah Carey, Celine Dion, Christina Aguilera and Whitney put in a girlgroup. So it was just a matter of time until someone could come up with a girlgroup with better voices, or at least with voices that can work better together.

 

But that doesn't change anything. LIVE, as I said, Little Mix are on the same level. Yes, they might put a lot more effort when they are on cozy couch and ready to bring out amazing harmonies, but when they need to be on their feet and dance in front of a really big public, they do exactly like The Saturdays. Worse, I sincerely think The Saturdays did a better job on that WAU performance.

 

And no, their label hasn't worked hard to get Little Mix any airplay, we all know is due to Capital FM/Syco links and Radio 1 supporting them. It wasn't hard at all for Little Mix to break through, they pretty much already did. They were in the biggest TV shows for like 10 weeks, they went on tour, etc. Their first single was hugely anticipated unlike many new artists that people never heard of who release their first single.

Because you are stating that The Saturdays are better vocally, live (acapella or not)! When Little Mix and Stooshe have much better harmonies, imo. I'm not saying they need "great voices" for the songs they release, I'm just discussing back at the claims that The Saturdays are better live vocalists, when I think differently. I don't need to keep saying the Sats are my favourite girl group at the moment (it's too soon to start ranking Little Mix amongst them - but that puts them ahead of Spice Girls and Girls Aloud for me!) but it feels like I HAVE to in this forum.

 

Your last paragraph is complete nonsense though. :s Little Mix DID have a harder job of breaking through than your average group/solo X Factor star. They were put together at bootcamp, "meh" performances at the start of the live shows (which many people predicted they would be out within the first three weeks - like every other girl group on XF), it's harder for the public to connect to a group of 4 as opposed to just the one person, but they worked their arses off on X Factor to show that they are a good girl group and that they aren't like the other groups on XF prior to them. They still had to work hard to get the support and the promotional slots, it's not given to them on a plate just like that. Why did Leon Jackson, Matt Cardull, Joe McElderry etc.. all struggle to get the airplay and promo slots, if it was that easy for a winner? Especially for them as their seasons of XFactor had more viewers!

 

Yes, The Sats DO need to step it up. Like I keep saying, they're 5 years ahead of the other girl groups, so why are they releasing watered down stuff that only has appeal for about 10 plays, like '30 Days' or 'Notorious'? They should have their own sound and identity by now. They ARE struggling to find themselves as a group, both image wise and musically. They need to sit down, think about the things that work best for them and play to their strengths! Their sales aren't going to lie. 'Up', 'Ego' and 'Higher' are their 3 biggest selling songs. All three are modern day, pop classics, imo. They had one (well several!) on OYR in 'White Lies' most notably! So why aren't they sticking to them pop songs and just jumping on every bandwagon possible, just to try and get a number 1 hit! I still think 'Ego' and 'Higher' would have been their best shots of a number 1 single, had it been the lead singles from their campaigns, and this would all be a completely different story.

hurricane PREACH, jonjo has no idea what he's talking about. I HAVE FAITH IN YEE!

I mean comparing All Fired Up accoustic to End Of Time accoustic is AWFUL. At least compare it to their ego/higher live lounge.

Edited October 9, 201212 yr by LeeWallaceee

hurricane PREACH, jonjo has no idea what he's talking about. I HAVE FAITH IN YEE!

I mean comparing All Fired Up accoustic to End Of Time accoustic is AWFUL. At least compare it to their ego/higher live lounge.

I posted similar video recordings. Also, they're both up tempo tracks, stripped down. So they were fair comparisons.

 

You want their 'Ego'/'Higher' live lounge performances? I'll raise you both these... (oh and Little Mix have live lounge shortly, too! :P)

 

 

 

I feel like Charlie Sheen. WINNING.

Wow, their cover of We Are Young! I was hating the track and this has just made me hate it more. Jonjo stop being an absolute whore.

Wow, their cover of We Are Young! I was hating the track and this has just made me hate it more. Jonjo stop being an absolute whore.

You can like more than one girl band ya know Lee! :P