August 24, 201311 yr I do think the actual roses and design is really nice, I just think it is far too large and in the wrong place, but if she is happy with it, who gives a f***.
August 24, 201311 yr Each to their own, but it looks utterly horrendous. I dread to think what it'll look like in 60 years time.
August 24, 201311 yr The tattoo itself isn't ugly or anything. Like you can see there was a lot of work put into it. The roses are nice, etc, etc. But it's just too big, at the wrong place and just....No, Cheryl, no. :angry:
August 25, 201311 yr It is beautiful, but it's not the sort of beautiful that should be on skin. If she's happy with it, more power to her, but it's not quite to my tastes. She has always loved a good tattoo, though.
August 25, 201311 yr People shouldn't worry that much about it, they won't get anywhere near her bum anyway, so they're not really concerned. :kink: