Um, you can check my posts lol. I was saying it all along on here, and even before that I was saying it irl. I haven't bought anythin Britney (or streamed) since ITZ ;) I couldn't make a petition, which needs fan support, when the fans were adamant that all was fine and rosy since Womaniser, and jumping down anyone's throat whenever we suggested that she was being forced to sing and was being controlled!! Was I on here with Hold It Against Me, or waa it afterz when I complained about how bad it is and how she clearly has no connection to the song, and the fans all jumped on me? But I refused to help those controlling her. Haven't bought a thing since I started suspecting it with BO.

I don't care about what you've apparently been saying apparently for years apparently since the very beginning having had zero evidence and going off media just like the rest of the people. It does not matter in the slightest at this point no matter how many times you repeat that. Which also suggests you're kind of... enjoying the whole situation??

 

Only the most selfish of people can turn #FreeBritney and what happened to her into 'look at me! i was right! look at me!'. NO. ONE. CARES.

:clap: Preach. It really isn’t appropriate to turn this into an “I told you!!” situation. This isn’t about you, or us. It’s about Britney and I’m sure we can all come together in agreeing that we want the best outcome for her. So let’s leave behind this strange “I was right all along” thing~

how has anyone not listened to her music 'In The Zone' lol?

 

That's the thing, it hasn't been hers since ITZ!! BO is on the cusp. Hit the conservatorship in the pocket! Force it to release her.

 

And nope, not enjoying it :rolleyes: ,just saying if we had all been paying attention earlier, and were listening to those saying something isn't right, instead of hoping for the best, we could have challenged this situation ages ago.

Shes the EP on BO and had no MGMT at the time. If there's one record that is probably the most Britney it's a toss up between that and ITZ.

Did she get to choose the performances? Could she deviate from a dance pop sound like she wanted to on Original Doll, which they shelved? Could she have a say in the videos? That's why I say it's on the cusp.

That's the thing, it hasn't been hers since ITZ!! BO is on the cusp. Hit the conservatorship in the pocket! Force it to release her.

 

And nope, not enjoying it :rolleyes: ,just saying if we had all been paying attention earlier, and were listening to those saying something isn't right, instead of hoping for the best, we could have challenged this situation ages ago.

yes, the solution is to totally obsess over a celebrity, stalk them and dig into their private life in order to expose a potential evil secret despite having 0 proof something is actually happening when in reality it could've just been the case of burning out/moving on with life/person wanting privacy or getting some help already.

yes, the solution is to totally obsess over a celebrity, stalk them and dig into their private life in order to expose a potential evil secret despite having 0 proof something is actually happening when in reality it could've just been the case of burning out/moving on with life/person wanting privacy or getting some help already.

 

That wasn't the case though. Just look at the petformances, plus thr phone calls the paparazzi overheard, and therr you have the evidence.

Wisha coulda shoulda doesn’t solve anything!!!

 

 

The posting topless pictures isn’t exactly making a case for herself at such a crucial time in my opinion.

Edited July 25, 20213 yr by LMFan

I thought the same thing with the photos, I understand she is making a statement and hitting back but seriously this is not the time to do it in this way.

The topless photographs are more damaging and right now it's not in her favour.

LMAO

 

Since WHEN will the IG posts be held against her in a court of law? :lol: She's breathing for the first time in over a Decade. She can post wtf she wants.

I completely disagree with you all*. She has every right to post what she wants. Topless pictures (and she is covering herself) is not going to be considered as evidence to keep the conservatorship going. Was Jennifer Lopez considered to be doing something “damaging” when a recent single of hers had her naked on the artwork? No, so the same applies to Britney.

 

She’s spent 13 years having to do what she’s told to do, let’s not judge her now for having agency over her own body and making her own choices.

 

* Edit: Bar Jonjo *.*

Also, posting topless pics on social media doesn't do anything. Y'all can handle it when others post these kinda images but the moment Britney does it, it's taboo?! Lmao.

 

It's fine?

What could honestly be wrong with posting a topless picture? She can do whatever she wants to do with her body and it wouldn't make any difference to the case, what could even be damaging about this?

Why is she posting topless photos?? I don't get it.

Maybe she wants to be free so she’s freeing her boobs? Who knows :rofl:

It’s just bizarre behaviour. If she wants out of this conservatorship then she needs to stop it in my opinion. The run of posts recently aren’t exactly making a case for herself. It’s a shame.

Rihanna does it all the time and I don’t think anyone finds that bizarre…I think it’s just you who is having that problem which is a shame!!!

The Instagram posts are going to have ZERO effect on her case. Z E R O. ZILCH. NADA. NOTHING.

 

Everyone who is posting topless selfies and videos on social media are now required to be under a conservatorship I guess? I mean they must if it's considered being "crazy" right? :rolleyes: