Wednesday at 09:154 days 1 hour ago, aeroco said:Story hits totally different now, it’s thrown me, I always thought it was a reference to the 2005 diagnosis and her overcoming adversity in general. Of course, the message was always there in the song that it was a new battle but she didn’t let the world know this time. Incredible.This - so many of her new lyrics/songs now have a deeper meaning behind them.
Wednesday at 10:274 days Oh wow! So sad but amazing she got through it again! Need to watch this tonightAlso yes ‘Story’ to smash please !
Wednesday at 10:294 days 1 minute ago, Lukuzz said:Also yes ‘Story’ to smash please !So here for this, really hope it gets some love, it was a fan favourite from the beginning.
Wednesday at 13:304 days Ya now that unfortunately it was a more up to date meaning than we thought it would be great to see it smash.I'm still taken back by the news she had a 2nd battle with cancer. What a woman she is.
Wednesday at 20:444 days Author Keep coming back to this after watching the documentary. When you see the amount of intrusion there was when she first had cancer in 2005, it’s really no surprise she kept things private this time. I have a new found admiration for her and I didn’t think I could love her anymore! I’m glad the news broke before the documentary because I would have been a WRECK to watch it first hand, especially when the episode up to that point had been so emotional.
Wednesday at 21:254 days I understand why she chose to keep it private. When she was diagnosed the first time around, nurses were offered money to take photos of her while she was in Australia.Can you imagine this in 2026 with a lot more people not having a concept called "privacy"?
Wednesday at 21:294 days Author 3 minutes ago, Red Blooded Man said:I understand why she chose to keep it private. When she was diagnosed the first time around, nurses were offered money to take photos of her while she was in Australia.Can you imagine this in 2026 with a lot more people not having a concept called "privacy"?Yeah that bit repulsed me! So glad no one took up that offer.
Wednesday at 21:334 days 2 minutes ago, Liam.k. said:Yeah that bit repulsed me! So glad no one took up that offer.To be honest, if any medical professional took up on that offer, they would lose the license to practise because it is likely to violate their hippo oath of which confidentiality is key.
Wednesday at 22:584 days 1 hour ago, Red Blooded Man said:To be honest, if any medical professional took up on that offer, they would lose the license to practise because it is likely to violate their hippo oath of which confidentiality is key.Yes but for a cheque big enough it may not bother some but thankfully no one was low enough to do it.
Wednesday at 23:504 days 52 minutes ago, Padamic_Tension said:Yes but for a cheque big enough it may not bother some but thankfully no one was low enough to do it.Possible. You did bring out an interesting point - what if they offered to a part-time cleaner?
Thursday at 22:023 days On 20/05/2026 at 22:25, Red Blooded Man said:I understand why she chose to keep it private. When she was diagnosed the first time around, nurses were offered money to take photos of her while she was in Australia.Can you imagine this in 2026 with a lot more people not having a concept called "privacy"?I don't blame her keeping it private this time around. I wouldn't want paps taking photos of me in hospital. Edited Thursday at 23:083 days by DanielCarey
Thursday at 22:553 days 52 minutes ago, DanielCarey said:I don't blame for her keeping it private this time around. I wouldn't want paps taking photos of me in hospital.Yes its totally understandable and for her mentally it would be a huge help not to have such an invasion.
.thumb.jpg.86c978bfe5f3e122ad5f595f99d7c108.jpg)